Saturday, 07 June 2025

8647: Another One Pops Up

100 Percent Fed Up
Hits: 7

Earlier today, James Comey posted “8647” on Instagram, which many people immediately took to mean “86” (kill) “47” (President Trump).

Don Jr. called it flat out “calling for my dad to be murdered”:

White House Deputy Chief of Staff and Cabinet Secretary Taylor Budowich called it “deeply concerning” and said it is “being taken seriously”:

So you might think any reasonable person might want to steer far, far away from such a message, right?

Nope!

Not for the (definitely not ghey) Ed Krassenstein, who thought it was a great idea to double down on “86 47”, take a look:

ADVERTISEMENT

Even added the caption: “It’s time!”

Wow.

To be fair (as we always strive to do around here), while MANY are interpreting “86” to mean what I have always understood it to mean, Grok thinks it falls short of an actionable threat against a sitting President, although it sure seems like a line not smart to walk too close to:

Krassenstein followed up the post with this explanation, trying to whitewash the prior post and claim it’s totally non-violent):

James Comey is an American Hero.

8647 is the way to go!

It should become the new rallying call for Americans who are sick and tired of the US Constitution being torn up.

It should be a rallying call for Americans who are fed up with the current administration’s corruption.

The right wants it to be some nefarious symbol just they they wanted Abrego Garcia’s tattoos to be. They want to demonize anyone who thinks Trump is toxic for this country.

8647 = Get Trump out of Office! It has nothing to do with violence.

ADVERTISEMENT

COPE!

In a follow-up chat I had with Grok, it told me that using the term “86” in this context is arguably reckless and risks being misinterpreted as a call to harm, especially in the current political environment, and arguably just designed to create plausible deniability.  Gee, you think?  You mean the guy who’s had two (that we know of) assassination attempts already, one that missed by mere centimeters?

Plausible Deniability and Reckless Language

Krassenstein’s claim that 8647 is nonviolent could be an example of plausible deniability—using a term that has a violent connotation (“86”) while claiming it’s meant innocently. This is a common tactic in charged political discourse, where provocative language is used to rally supporters or provoke opponents while avoiding legal consequences. However:

  • The billiard balls image suggests the numbers were chosen for their visual representation, not necessarily to invoke “86” as slang for “kill.”

  • Billiard balls are a playful, non-threatening medium, which supports the nonviolent interpretation.

  • Krassenstein’s immediate clarification (“It has nothing to do with violence”) indicates an awareness of potential misinterpretation, which could undermine the argument that this was a deliberate coded threat.

    • That said, using a term like “86” in this context is arguably reckless. Given its slang meaning, it risks being misinterpreted as a call to harm, especially in a polarized political environment. Krassenstein’s attempt to frame it as a nonviolent rallying cry doesn’t fully erase the violent undertone that “86” can carry, and this contradiction is likely why some users reacted with alarm.

     

    If you ask me, I think “plausible deniability” is what this is all about.

    I think Comey’s post was wildly reckless, and so now you’re going to see a bunch of Democrat shills posting the same thing to Twitter/X to normalize it and run cover for Comey.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    They’ll say, “See?  50 people posted the same thing, and we all said it was non-violent so obviously it was.”

    Just watch, it’s coming.

    Here was our original post:

    BREAKING: James Comey Calls for President Trump’s Assass*nation On Instagram!

    BREAKING: James Comey Calls for President Trump's Assass*nation On Instagram!

    Why does all the violent extreme always seem to come from the RINOs and the Far-Left loons?

    Here's the latest example....

    Remember James Comey?

    Sadly we all do.

    He ALLEGEDLY just called for President Trump's assassination over on Instagram -- nice to know death threats of a sitting President are totally cool with Mark Zuckerberg, but my 1.5 Million pro-Trump Facebook Page "We Love Trump" was banned for no reason.

    Anyway, I disgress.

    Here is Comey's post from about 30 minutes ago, that I screenshotted and posted on X:

    Full Instagram screenshot here:

    Oh how cute James!

    You just stumbled upon this "shell formation" on your beach walk, just totally randomly and organically huh?

    What a cute little story!

    Gee, I wonder what it could possibly mean?

    Of course we all know what it means.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    It's a direct threat to President Trump.

    To "86" someone most frequently and obviously means to kill someone.

    And "47" of course refers to our 47th President.

    Don Jr. gets it:

    Even ChatGPT gets it:

    Yes — in certain contexts, "86" can indeed mean to kill someone, though it's more often used to mean eliminate, get rid of, or cancel something or someone.

    ✅ Common Definitions of “86”:

    Context Meaning Example
    Restaurant slang Out of stock / remove from menu “We’re 86 on fries.”
    General slang Get rid of / eject / cancel “They 86’d the idea.”
    Underworld/criminal slang Kill or dispose of someone “He got 86’d after snitching.”

    🕵 Origin Theories:

  • Prohibition-era bars used "86" to mean "cut someone off" or "throw them out."

  • Rhyming slang for “nix” (cancel).

  • Some claim it originated from Old Hollywood or military codes.

    • 🔪 In Violent or Darker Contexts:

  • In mobster or gangland slang, "86" can explicitly mean to kill someone, especially when used by enforcers or hitmen.

  • Example:

    “If he talks, we’ll have to 86 him.”

    • ⚠ Summary

    Yes — “86” can mean “to kill someone” depending on the tone and context. If someone says “86 47” in reference to a public figure like a president, that’s a very serious and potentially threatening implication, especially if it's not clearly metaphorical.

    Dictionary definitions confirm the meaning is to kill someone:

    This guy is sick for posting that!

    Hey Pam, Hey Kash....if y'all are not too busy working on those Epstein Files, maybe you could look into this please?

    Meanwhile, White House Deputy Chief of Staff and Cabinet Secretary Taylor Budowich says the threat is deeply concerning and is being taken seriously:

    Arrests and prosecutions soon?

    ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!

    Honestly, I also have to say it's quite a lack of creativity James...

    You do know Gretchen Whitmer already pulled this stunt, right?

    Did Gov. Whitmer Just Threaten Our President? “8645”

    This all comes on the heels of a closely related story I brought you yesterday:

    SICK: Famous Monty Python Actor Wants To K*LL Stephen Miller “By The Neck”

    SICK: Famous Monty Python Actor Wants To K*LL Stephen Miller “By The Neck”

    Why does Woke have to ruin everything?

    Now I can't even enjoy Monty Python anymore.

    Because after John Cleese just said he wanted to kill Stephen Miller and then specified "by the neck" I just don't see myself laughing at a Monty Python movie ever again.

    But that's just me.

    Allow me to explain what happened...

    John Cleese posted the following message to Twitter/X:

    I see Stephen Miller says he is actively thinking about suspending 'habeas corpus'

    As this has been the keystone of the Rule of Law for centuries, l'd like to suggest that we actively think about suspending Stephen Miller...

    Preferably by the neck

    Sick post.

    So I reposted it with this message to Elon Musk, Ed Martin, Stephen Miller, Pam Bondi, Kash Patel and President Trump:

    You can only see my post, not the original quoted post because Cleese deleted it.

    I had a feeling he might do that so I took a screenshot of it and posted it here:

    Sorry John, the Internet is written in ink.

    You deleting that post makes no difference, we all saw you post a death threat.

    And we kept the receipts!

    Closer look here:

    So I'd like to suggest something....

    I'd like to suggest we give you the "Due Process" you so dearly love (even though you're not even an American citizen) and put you on trial for making a violent death threat against Stephen Miller.

    Sound good?

    See, that's how we do it here in America.  Maybe the UK is different, but we don't call for someone to be eliminated "by the neck" here in America you sick piece of crap!

    Oh, and while we're at it, you're so worked up about Habeas Corpus?

    Get your facts straight before you call for someone to be executed.

    Here's the truth:

    SUSPENDING HABEAS CORPUS: You Do Know The Biden Regime Did It, Right? (MUST READ)

    SUSPENDING HABEAS CORPUS: You Do Know The Biden Regime Did It, Right? (MUST READ)

    There is so much talk and so much handwringing by the Far Left "MSM" about whether President Trump will suspend Habeas Corpus...

    Oh my!

    But, did you know the Biden Regime did it?

    For almost the full four years?

    It's true!  But first let me back up and explain what Habeas Corpus even means because I'm guessing some of you don't speak Latin?

    Habeas corpus is a legal right that protects people from being thrown in jail without a good reason.

    It literally means "produce the body".

    Which means in layman's terms the government must explain to a judge why they’re keeping someone locked up—and if they can’t prove it’s legal, that person must be let go.

    In simple terms:
    “You can’t just arrest someone and hold them forever. You have to show the court what law they broke and why they’re being held.”

    It’s one of the oldest and most important protections for individual freedom in any fair legal system.

    Ok, so that's what it means, and the MSM is freaking out that President Trump is going to suspend it in order to quickly deport all illegal aliens that have invaded our country.

    If he does, he would be in extremely good Presidential company:

    BREAKING: President Trump May SUSPEND Habeas Corpus To Deport All Illegals (Three Other Presidents Did It Too!)

    But more than that, I want to talk about how the Biden Regime already did it, from 2021-2025.

    As is usual with Democrats, they employ the "piss in your face and tell you it's raining" strategy, which I have to admit works really well for them.

    Here's how it works....

    When someone like President Trump takes action, he does it out in the open, he calls it what it is, and he lets the chips fall where they may.

    What you see is what you get.

    But when the Democrats take action, they label it one thing (like, oh I don't know "protecting Democracy!" or "keeping you safe!") and in reality their actions prove they are doing the exact opposite.

    Take the J6 prisoners....

    From 2021-2025, they were functionally denied every aspect of Habeas Corpus known to man, left to rot in disgusting solitary confinement cells with inadequate food, water or sanitization.

    Many died while being illegally held in prison with no civil rights.

    In every sense of the concept, the Biden Regime suspended Habeas Corpus for these J6 prisoners, but since the Biden Regime didn't expressly label it as "Suspending Habeas Corpus" the MSM is too dumb to connect the dots and do actual, real journalism.

    Good thing you have us!

    I always want to check my biases and make sure I'm not off base, so I asked the far-left leaning ChatGPT if my analysis on Biden's functional suspension of Habeas Corpus was accurate.

    This was my question:

    The answer is going to blow your mind.

    The far-left leaning ChatGPT confirms I'm 100% on the money:

    Analysis: Did the Biden Administration Effectively Suspend Habeas Corpus for January 6 Defendants?

    Overview: The U.S. Constitution guarantees the right to habeas corpus—protection against unlawful detention—except in cases of rebellion or invasion when public safety may require it (Article I, Section 9). While the Biden administration did not officially suspend habeas corpus, the treatment of many January 6 defendants has raised serious concerns about whether, in practice, their constitutional rights were bypassed in a way that functionally mirrors suspension.

    Key Points Supporting the “Functional Suspension” Argument:

  • Extended Pretrial Detention Without Bail:

  • Numerous J6 defendants were held for months or even over a year without trial or conviction, often denied bail despite nonviolent charges.

  • Judges and prosecutors cited "danger to the community" or "potential to incite violence" as reasons, despite precedent allowing bail for far more serious crimes.

  • This mirrors historical suspensions of habeas corpus, where the accused were detained indefinitely without timely trial.

  • Solitary Confinement and Harsh Conditions:

  • Reports from defense attorneys, detainees, and members of Congress (e.g., Marjorie Taylor Greene, Louie Gohmert) allege that prisoners were kept in near-solitary confinement, denied medical treatment, and subjected to abusive conditions.

    • Load More

    This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport.

    View the original article here.


    Source link

    Search