Saturday, 19 April 2025

‘Connect The Dots’: Rep. Crockett Mocked For Bizarre Theory About Rising Grocery Prices


President Donald Trump recently elaborated on how his policies are designed to, among other things, bring the cost of groceries down for the American people.

But after twiddling their thumbs during four years of skyrocketing inflation under Joe Biden, many on the left are now complaining that it’s taking Trump too long to clean up his predecessor’s mess.

For her part, Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) offered a characteristically unintelligible argument against Trump, seemingly tying his immigration policy to supposedly rising supermarket costs.

As Breitbart reported:

“So I am telling you that this is a failed thing, but we’ve got to do better to connect the dots and let people know the reason you can’t afford a home is because of these failed immigration policies,” she bizarrely asserted.

Crockett also attributed the price of groceries to “failed immigration policies.”

“The reason you’re not going to be able to afford your food is because of these failed immigration policies,” she claimed.

“And the same can go for the hospitality industries where we have so many of those in the hospitality industry that are saying they do not have the workers that they need right now,” she added.

Her remarks resulted in a new onslaught of social media mockery:

The Texas Democrat was also roasted by critics recently for an on-air rant about Trump’s cognitive fitness.

As RealClearPolitics reported, she attempted to whitewash the Biden years while putting all the blame on the current president less than three months after his inauguration:

But this crazy tariff war that nobody asked for, where he basically is invoking emergency powers, the same thing that he did under the Alien Enemies Act, like the fact that no one is questioning his mental acuity or fitness to serve is beyond wild to me, right?

Like the fact that they sat around, called Joe Biden, sleepy Joe Biden. And as I said before, at least you could sleep at night because you didn’t have to worry about your 401k disappearing overnight. You didn’t have to worry about these allegations of fake invasions.

You didn’t have to worry about the cost of food just skyrocketing or skyrocketing cost of all of your electronics. You know, the fact that Apple was flying in planes of iPhones before the tariffs it like this is crazy work for no reason. So, you know, I just hope that people remember because seemingly they got amnesia the first time.

Here’s another widely mocked moment from Crockett’s latest anti-Trump tour:

RELATED REPORT:

Rep. Jasmine Crockett Hit With New Investigation

Rep. Jasmine Crockett Hit With New Investigation

Far-left Democrat Rep. Jasmine Crockett is now under investigation by the Federal Election Commission.

The FEC has formally launched a probe regarding suspicious donations through ActBlue to Rep. Crockett's 2024 campaign.

Here are the details:

Last month, a complaint was filed against Jasmine by the conservative Coolidge-Regan Foundation, who alleged that her campaign received potentially fraudulent donations through the major Democrat fundraising platform ActBlue.

Specifically, the complaint pointed out a specific donor -- an elderly man named Randy Best in Texas -- that gave Rep. Crocket 53 separate donations.

In a video social media from Rep. Crockett's 2026 opponent Sholdon Daniels, Best's wife claimed to have no knowledge of these donations.

Watch here:

Now, the FEC has notified the foundation that it will be fully investigating the incredibly suspicious matter.

The Daily Signal reported:

The Federal Election Commission opened an investigation into firebrand Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Texas, regarding donations to her 2024 campaign made through ActBlue, a Democrat fundraising powerhouse organization.

The Coolidge-Reagan Foundation, a conservative advocacy group, made the FEC complaint on March 26, as first reported by The Daily Signal.

On April 2, the FEC notified the Coolidge-Reagan Foundation it would review the matter and notify Crockett.

“The respondents will be notified of this complaint within five business days,” Wanda D. Brown, the FEC assistant general counsel for complaints examination and legal administration, said in the letter.

“You will be notified as soon as the Federal Election Commission (FEC) takes final action on your client’s complaint. Should you receive any additional information in this matter, please forward it to the Office of the General Counsel.”

Brown wrote the letter to Dan Backer, a Washington lawyer representing the Coolidge-Reagan Foundation.

“The FEC opened an investigation. There is a process, but they are investigating,” Backer told The Daily Signal.

The complaints reference a specific suspect donor reported to have given 53 separate donations totaling $595 to Crockett’s campaign through the ActBlue portal.

The suspect donor was a 73-year-old Texas resident named Randy Best, according to the FEC complaint.

Seems extremely shady to me.

I can't help but wonder if the FEC will dig up anything else in their investigation...

Expose the fraud and hold those responsible accountable!

RELATED REPORT:

Is Jasmine Crockett Trying To Get President Trump Killed?

Is Jasmine Crockett Trying To Get President Trump Killed?

Jasmine Crockett went on MSNBC today and many are saying she incited violence against President Trump....

This post lays it out very clearly:

Jasmine Crockett is trying to get someone to assassinate President Trump

Listen to her Language…
• Donald Trump is “occupying the White House”
• Donald Trump is an “enemy of the United States”
• Donald Trump is a “Dictator”

This is called Stochastic Terrorism

Stochastic Terrorism refers to when public figures or media outlets use inflammatory rhetoric to demonize a person or group.

They do so knowing it could unpredictably incite lone individuals to commit violence against the target (e.g., Trump), believing they’re acting heroically.

Meanwhile, the instigator maintains plausible deniability for inspiring the act.

What do you think?

Is this acceptable behavior?

Is she trying to get President Trump killed with this inflammatory rhetoric?

I hope DA Ed Martin looks into this:

FULL TRANSCRIPT:

So unfortunately, we have someone occupying the White House, and as far as I'm concerned, he is an enemy to the United States.

He swore an oath just like the rest of us.
But right now, you are literally putting us at risk—all because of what?
Because you want to convince your followers that you should be a dictator too.

That you should never leave the White House.
Because you don't believe that elections should take place.
I don't really understand what is going on, and I don't know what it's going to take to get people to wake up.

RELATED REPORTS:

Does Far-Left Rep. Jasmine Crockett Not Even Know How To Spell Her Own Name?

Meet Jasmine Crockett, Triggered On X — In For a Very Rough Future

Meet Jasmine Crockett, Triggered On X -- In For a Very Rough Future

Meet Jasmine Crockett, an American lawyer and politician currently serving as the U.S. Representative for Texas's 30th congressional district since January 2023.

Her district includes parts of South Dallas County, Central Dallas, Dallas Love Field Airport, and portions of Tarrant County.

She is a member of the Democratic Party and previously served in the Texas House of Representatives for the 100th district.

In the 118th Congress, Crockett was selected as the Democratic freshman class representative, acting as a liaison between the House Democratic leadership and the newly-elected Democratic members.

She was also named as a co-chair for the 2024 Harris-Walz campaign.

And.....she got mega triggered on X today, or her staff did.

Allow me to explain.

Crockett posted this question to X:  "Which branch of Government does Elon belong to? Asking for a friend…."

So I answered her (seemed like the nice thing to do right?  Help a confused woman out, so I did): "He belongs to WE THE PEOPLE. Hope that helps clear it up for you."

Well, Ms. Crockett didn't like that very much and she blocked me moments later!

Take a look:

I have so many questions, perhaps you do too.

First up, why does her profile look like some 1-900 sex phone number that you'd dial up in the 1990s and pay $4.99/minute for?

Look Jazzy, you're in Congress (somehow) not running some illicit, late night, sex line.

I'm embarrassed for you to have that logo!

Second question: are you literally doing nothing other than reading your X notifications?

Aren't you supposed to be working or something?

Or is this one of those 100 days Congress has off each year?

Third question: why does the concept of WE THE PEOPLE trigger you so much?  Why do all the far-left Communists in America hate WE THE PEOPLE so much?

Fourth question: are you really so thin-skinned that you can't handle feedback from WE THE PEOPLE?

In regard to that last question, I believe Ms. "Full-of-Crock"-ett is in for a VERY rough future.

If these people get so triggered that they have to block people who simply answer a question they asked online, then the next four years of massive reform lead by Trump, Vance, Elon and Vivek is going to be extremely rough on them.

Some may not make it.

And no, that's not a threat.  I'm saying some will literally not be able to cope and will drop out of office.  They'll just leave.  That's my prediction.

Because this is the generation that was raised on participation trophies....and DEI.

Everything was handed to them because life must be made FAIR.

Not fairness of opportunity, fairness of outcome.

And when the adults are back in charge, and we return to a meritocracy and we start holding people accountable and asking "What did you get done this week?" -- my hunch is that people like Ms. Crockett will turtle and crater.

Ummmm, what did I get done?

I blocked some patriotic Americans on X!  Yay for me!

"You're fired".

Speaking of DEI, I would NEVER say that good old Jazzy Crocket is a DEI hire, but others have:

Look, I'm not here to take sides.

I'm just a reporter.

A blocked reporter, but a reporter nonetheless.

So watch Ms. Crockett in this video and tell me if this is proper behavior or ghetto behavior?

And before anyone gets all spun up into a tizzy, let's get our definitions clear, shall we?

Google Search, citing to Columbian University, defines ghetto as "behaving in a low-class manner":

So that's the definition and I'm curious to know if you think what you watched in that clip above is proper decorum or ghetto behavior?

And since ghetto behavior simply means "behaving in a low-class manner" I find it wildly rude and racist and offensive that some people would conflate this with a certain race.

Don't bring that garbage around here!

Quite frankly, I think it's very rude and racist for Racist Liberals to suggest that "behaving in a low-class manner" is some how associated with any certain race, so don't bother bringing that racist trope around here, thank you very much!

But anyway, I think that about wraps things up.

I believe Jasmine Crockett and her ilk (the Far-Left hating America constituency) are going to be in for a very rough four years and I think many will simply not make it to the finish line in office.

RELATED REPORTS:

‘You Attacked Her’: Even CNN Host Took Issue With Rep. Crockett’s Insulting Outburst Toward MTG

STAY TRASHY? New Orleans Mayor Proclaims “Back That Azz Up” Day In Honor of Juvenile

This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport.

View the original article here.


Source link