The group Mamavation tested 13 facial tissue brands for PFAS, otherwise known as ‘forever chemicals.’
Mamavation focuses on eco-wellness product investigations.
“Mamavation’s EPA-certified laboratory found indications of PFAS ‘forever chemicals’ after analyzing popular facial tissues on the market today,” Mamavation wrote.
“PFAS are per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances that have been used for many decades as stain-resistant, oil-resistant, grease-resistant, & water-resistant chemicals in commerce,” the group noted.
Looking for the safest FACIAL TISSUE like Kleenex? We tested all these brands for indications of PFAS “forever chemicals.” https://t.co/3mUDGhYQbD #mamavation
— Mamavation (@Mamavation) June 19, 2024
Mamavation summarized its findings:
46% of total facial tissue products tested had indications of PFAS “forever chemicals.” That’s 6 detections out of 13 facial tissue brands that had organic fluorine above 10 parts per million (ppm) according to our laboratory. 66% of the products with detections of organic fluorine were advertised made from bamboo. That’s 4 out of 6 products that had detections of organic fluorine. 100% of the products with detections of organic fluorine were advertised as having some type of environmentally friendly feature such as being made from bamboo, having a “sustainable” certification like Forest Stewardship Council (FSC), or being classified as “tree-free.” That’s 6 out of 6 products that had detections of organic fluorine. Ranges of organic fluorine, a marker for PFAS, were from 10 ppm to 25 ppm. These are not levels of PFAS that would be considered “intentionally added” and are more likely to be from contamination in the supply chain. It’s clear from the reporting we received from our EPA-certified laboratory that claims of “sustainability” or something similar have no bearing on traces of organic fluorine, which is an indicator of PFAS “forever chemicals.” Therefore, just because your box of facial tissue has a sustainable claim doesn’t mean they are avoiding all indications of PFAS. Our research also suggests that bamboo versions of facial tissue may have additional contamination issues that may not be shared by larger or more conventional tissue brands.
⚠️ Nothing to Sneeze at? PFAS Found in Popular Facial Tissue Brands
66% of products with PFAS indications were advertised as bamboo-based. All products with PFAS indications claimed some type of environmentally friendly feature or certification. https://t.co/nrTiieAK60
— Children’s Health Defense (@ChildrensHD) August 2, 2024
Mamavation organized the facial tissue brands into the following categories:
Testing of 13 brands of facial tissues reveals half of them contain “forever chemicals”.
Mamavation tested 13 facial tissue brands for PFAS “forever chemicals” sold in the USA and found that 46% showed indications of PFAS, with 66% of products with PFAS indications being… pic.twitter.com/x9iBi96kGM
— OutsideTheMatrix aka QRASH (@PaTrumpGirl) July 26, 2024
The Defender reports:
Facial Tissues were purchased or donated from community members between January 2023 and April 2024. Our EPA-certified laboratory received and tested each box of facial tissues we sent.
No products were donated by the manufacturer. Many types of facial tissue were represented — some of these brands were lotion-free, dye-free, soft, hypoallergenic or sustainable however, each brand is made for daily use.
Some facial tissue boxes were donated to a local community center because we received more than we could test, i.e. many of the same brand of facial tissue was received when purchased online.
Testing: Mamavation’s EPA-certified laboratory uses marker testing to identify the potential presence of PFAS “forever chemicals” in facial tissue. Organic fluorine is a marker for PFAS because all PFAS chemicals are carbon-based compounds that contain fluorine.
The specific lab method used to test for total fluorine was the Determination of Total Fluorine by Oxygen Flask Combustion and Ion-Selective Electrode.
If total fluorine was observed at a detection level of 10 ppm or greater, the lab did the “Determination of free Fluoride Ion” in the product by Ion-Selective Electrode and then subtracted that from the “Total Fluorine” to determine the amount of organic fluorine. This marker testing is likely to show the presence of PFAS.
Organic fluorine can also capture other fluoropolymers, pharmaceuticals, and common hydrofluorocarbon refrigerants, such as 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane (commonly known as R-134a) and 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene (commonly known as HFO-1234yf), which are all also PFAS. None of which you want around your food, personal care products, or facial tissue.
Scott Belcher, Ph.D., an associate professor with the Center for Environmental and Health Effects of PFAS at North Carolina State University said:
“Fluoropolymers, such as polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), are extremely common forms of PFAS that could be contributing to the organic fluorine found in facial tissues. Methods used for detecting individual PFAS, such as PFOA or GenX, cannot directly identify PTFE.”
“However, the analysis of total organic fluorine (TOF) does account for all PFAS contaminants in facial tissues, including PTFE. Therefore, this method of testing serves as a good ‘spot-check’ of consumer products.”
Mamavation organized the facial tissue brands as followed:
Not Our Favorite Facial Tissues – “These facial tissue products were sent to our EPA-certified laboratory and it was reported back they had detections of organic fluorine, which is indicative of PFAS ‘forever chemicals,'” Mamavation stated.
Better Facial Tissues – “These facial tissue products were sent to our EPA-certified laboratory and it was reported back they had non-detect organic fluorine results. The detection limit of the testing was 10 ppm and thus anything under that amount would not be detectable to our lab. However, based on the materials used, they were deemed to be “better” and not ‘best’ based on the less environmentally friendly inputs used. They are more representative of regular tissues, but some may be soft tissues or sensitive skin tissues,” Mamavation stated.
Best Facial Tissues – “These facial tissue products were sent to our EPA-certified laboratory and it was reported back they had non-detect organic fluorine results. The detection limit of the testing was 10 ppm and thus anything under that amount would not be detectable to our lab. These products were also made from materials that are less problematic to the environment,” Mamavation stated.
Read the full report at Mamavation.
Source link