Kevin:
Hey everyone, me Kevin here. This is absolutely insane—there is massive drama going on that you’ve got to know about, and it could save your life from cancer. I’m talking about as much as 38% to 50% of cancers. It could save your children’s lives.

Yeah, this video has to do with the controversy between The New York Times and RFK, but if you value your life, I’d recommend sharing this video. If you don’t value your life, there’s a link down below for life insurance. Go to metkevin.com/slife. It’s a paid promotion and a paid partner of the channel. You can get life insurance so that way at least your family can benefit.

Okay, let’s get into the topic.

So first, I saw a tweet post yesterday that somebody said they were spitting out their coffee after reading this New York Times fact-check of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. I thought, “Okay, okay.” Somebody said “fact-check”—that’s like a bat signal to Kevin, like, “Ah, Kevin’s going to work!” Because that’s what I do—I love taking apart headlines and giving you the straight scoop.

As usual in life, there’s substantially more context than what you can fit in 140 characters—or, I think it’s like 280 now, but whatever.

The screenshot that Brad posted was a quote from a New York Times article. I’m going to read it to you once, but I’m going to give you a preface because, at first, you’re going to be like, “Wait, what?” And then I’ll clarify the details. But you’re going to see the irony, how disgusting, and how bad this work by The New York Times is.

Mind you, I know—where’s my newspaper? I subscribe to The New York Times, okay? I try to be somebody who listens to all sources. It’s right here; I’ve got it. This is the Sunday Times. It says it costs $6 for this bundle—see that? November 7th.

Okay, so you know I also—despite how much I hate them, and they bagged on me when I ran for governor—I got The LA Times too. I hate their guts. They were not very nice to me, that editorial board. I hate you, editorial board of The LA Times. Suck it.

So, with that said, let’s get into this.

The New York Times wrote:
“Mr. Kennedy has singled out Froot Loops as an example of products with too many artificial ingredients, questioning why the Canadian version has fewer than the U.S. version.”

Then you might be asking yourself, “Oh my gosh, is Kevin really going to talk to us about Froot Loops?”

No, I’m going to talk to you about cancer and dying, but we’re going to start with Froot Loops.

Remember, RFK was just appointed and he’s still subject to Senate confirmation. He might not get through, but imagine this: people are scared that someone might actually bring change to the fattest, most obese, and sickest country in the world.

Oh, how interesting.

You know, I actually love RFK’s line that he wants to make health care about health care and not “sick care,” which is what it is now, in his opinion—and I agree.

Anyway, he singled out Froot Loops as having too many artificial ingredients compared to the Canadian version.

Now, I’m going to read this word-for-word to you because this is where I’m like, “Wait, what are you doing, New York Times?”

So they write:
“But he was wrong. The ingredient list is roughly the same.”

Okay, so you read up to that, and you’re like, “Alright, so he’s wrong. It’s got the same ingredient list. Alright, RFK made a mistake. Let’s move on.”

Oh, wait a minute:

“But he was wrong. The ingredient list is roughly the same, although Canada’s has natural colorings made from blueberries and carrots.”

Okay, that sounds good—colorings from blueberries and carrots, got it.

“While the U.S. product contains Red Dye No. 40, Yellow Dye No. 5, Blue Dye No. 1, as well as butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), a lab-made chemical that is used for freshness, according to the ingredient label.”

Dear New York Times, you just told me that RFK was wrong because the ingredient list is actually the same between Canada and the United States in Froot Loops. Then you proceeded to list four different chemicals that are substantially different in the U.S. version!

So then I decided, “Okay, why don’t we do a little bit of research?”

I went to the National Institute for Health, which is where you can find published studies on things like Red Dye No. 40.

Google this, please: The synthetic food dye Red Dye No. 40 causes DNA damage and colonic inflammation.

That doesn’t sound good. That’s from September 2023. It’s from a bunch of researchers associated with the University of South Carolina—voted for Trump, by the way, that state.

But anyway, I want to read some portions of this to you because it’s scary.

Then I want you to think for a moment about how RFK is someone who’s standing against these sorts of chemicals in our food.

And I want you to take away some life lessons here, because they’re going to tell you the dangers that are very real—to our children, to you, and how bad it really is.

Kevin:
The incidence of colorectal cancer among young people has been on the rise for four decades, and its underlying causes are only now starting to be uncovered. Recent studies suggest that consuming ultra-processed foods and pro-inflammatory diets may be contributing factors.

The increase in the use of synthetic food colors, such as food dyes, over the last 40 years—including common synthetic dyes like Red Dye No. 40—coincides with the rise of early-onset colorectal cancer and other cancers, especially in children.

I just want to take a moment—a moment of silence almost—for a good friend of mine, Chandler David Smith. His wife died of colon cancer by the age of, I believe, about 24. One of the most beautiful people ever—inside and out. Great person.

It breaks my heart. Their children are now without their mom. I asked Chandler, “What do you think caused this?” when I met him in person last year, shortly after she passed. It was a really, really hard time.

He said the only thing he could relate it to was diet.

Now, she wasn’t unhealthy. She was skinny, fit, into fitness, and otherwise extremely healthy. Nothing wrong anywhere in her body. But the potential introduction of things like Red Dye No. 40 in children—I’m personally linking these.

Keep this story in mind, because it breaks my heart. I have seven children, and this matters. It matters to everybody watching this.

So I kept reading, and listen to some of these lines here:

“Red Dye No. 40 highlights the urgency of exploring this issue because the rise in cancers in younger, otherwise healthy people is coinciding with the rise in the use of these chemicals. They show DNA damage in both in vitro (lab) and in vivo (biological settings).”

The consumption of Red Dye No. 40 is leading to rising cancers in otherwise healthy young people in their 20s and 30s.

Diet plays a pivotal role in influencing the risk of these cancers. As a public health concern, research suggests that a diet high in processed meats, red meats, and saturated fatty acids may lead to an increased risk of developing cancers.

Conversely, diets rich in fiber, whole grains, fruits, and vegetables may offer protective benefits.

Now, we’ll talk about some of those in a moment. But the prevalence of ultra-processed, westernized diets—typically high in fat and simple carbs—comes with an increased incidence of these red dyes, especially over the last 40 years.

In fact, there are three major dyes that account for 90% of all dyes used in food in the USA. Red Dye No. 40 is the most common.

94% of people in the United States over 2 years old consume Red Dye No. 40, and over 40% of the foods marketed toward children in the USA contain these dyes.

Now, I’m not telling you, based on this research here, that if you just have Red Dye No. 40 once, you’re going to die.

What it does, according to this, is cause inflammation in your colon that, over time, leads to a more prone breeding ground for cancer.

But it’s not just inflammation. And this is where it got really scary.

I actually went all in and read the whole thing. I didn’t use AI on it at all—I read the whole thing because it was captivating.

They observed that p53 is a functional, mutated pathway caused by Red Dye No. 40 in either a low-fat or high-fat diet.

What is p53, and why is that pathway mutated by Red Dye No. 40? Well, that’s when things got scary.

The p53 pathway is a tumor suppressor pathway that prevents abnormal cells from propagating.

In other words, everybody has DNA damage in their body all the time. The sun causes it. Foods cause it. Whatever.

The point is for you to have a healthy diet to arm your body with the weapons it needs—much like the U.S. arms Ukraine—to fight cancers like Russians.

Okay, maybe I shouldn’t correlate these things, but whatever.

Pathway 53 is a tumor suppressor, and it is functionally “inactivated” when humans have cancer.

So, in other words, cancer builds when p53 can’t work.

38% to 50% of cancers are correlated with mutations in the p53 pathway.

And guess what screws up pathway 53? Red Dye No. 40.

Now that you have a little bit more context, let’s go back to reading The New York Times:

“Mr. Kennedy has singled out Froot Loops as an example of why a product with too many artificial ingredients can cause problems, questioning why the Canadian version has fewer than the U.S. version.

But he was wrong. The ingredient list is roughly the same, although Canada has natural colors made from blueberries and carrots. The U.S. version contains Red Dye No. 40, Yellow No. 5, Blue No. 1, and BHT, a lab-made chemical for freshness.”

So, my friends, let’s now rewrite that as it should be written:

The Canadian version does not contain the chemicals that the U.S. version contains.

The U.S. version contains chemicals that affect over 94% of Americans over 2 years old. Those chemicals deactivate the weapon systems in your body that shoot down cancer.

Kevin:
It’s like Russia sending over suicide drones, and you’re trying to shoot them down—but you can’t.

You can’t because the FDA came in and took away all your anti-drone weapons by enabling Red Dye No. 40 to propagate throughout the entire United States, affecting children over 2 years old.

That’s scary, and that’s sad.

So, how does this affect your lifestyle?

Obviously, if you believe this, then limiting artificial sweeteners and processed foods in your diet is critical.

RFK stands for being critical of this, and I support anybody who stands for change—especially in the face of this data.

Now, I’m not saying that RFK is perfect. He has said things that have been proven untrue. But at least he is shaking the bush, and I support that.

How concerning is this?

Well, Red Dye No. 40 affects you over time by causing long-term inflammation, essentially creating a breeding ground for cancer.

Now, I’m not a doctor, but to distill this, my belief is that if you start deactivating some of the inflammation in your body by eating a healthier, balanced diet of healthy fats, it could make a big difference.

Look up how to balance Omega-3, 6, and 9. Write this down: You want one Omega-3 for every four parts of Omega-6, and you can have as many Omega-9s as you want in a balanced diet.

Obviously, don’t drown yourself in olive oil—that’s your Omega-9.

Your Omega-6s are going to be fried foods and seed oils. There’s a meme circulating on X where RFK comes in saying “Seed oils! Ultra-processed foods!” like Javier Milei cutting waste departments in Argentina.

So make sure to cut out—or “aura”—the red dyes in your life.

Make sure to share this video—it could save your life.

Anyway, I’ll continue with these deep-dive fact-checks. They take a lot more time, but I think they provide a lot of value and really get under the skin of the real problems in our society and culture.

Hopefully, this helps you out.

I love you all. Thank you so very much for being here and being a subscriber.

I’ve got to get back to work now—I’ve got to go look at some real estate.

With that said, Kevin out.