Saturday, 19 April 2025

Introducing…12 New Types of Clouds!

100 Percent Fed Up
Hits: 11

Yesterday, I wrote a lot about Science vs. Scientism.

If you missed that or want to catch up, you can read it all here:

Will You Take The “Q” Link Challenge With Me? Here’s How…

I bring that up because "Scientism" just struck again!

My whole life I remember four main types of clouds, how about you?

Can you name them?

I bet these will sound familiar:

Cumulus.

Cirrus.

Nimbus.

Stratus.  

The last one was so popular Dodge even named a car after it.

To be even more accurate, many consider only 3 main categories, often not including Nimbus.

The labels were created in 1802 by Luke Howard and describe their look:

  • Cumulus (heap)

  • Stratus (layer)

  • Cirrus (curl of hair)

  • Nimbus (rain cloud) – he used this term to describe any cloud producing precipitation, not as a distinct shape

    • But as it always seems to happen, modern "Scientism" is here to wreck the party, adding 12 additional categories of cloud.

    Why?

    Because we can't have people continue to call them Chemtrails, now can we?  That would just be silly.

    No, clearly they're not Chemtrails (sarcasm alert), clearly meteorology just randomly evolved and we now have 12 new types of clouds!

    Right, because that makes sense....

    See for yourself right here, from NBC News:

    FULL TRANSCRIPT:

    Forget being on cloud nine — we are on cloud twelve, because that’s how many new types of clouds have been added in this historic update coming from meteorologists.

    I’m a little biased, right? Exciting stuff, guys.

    All right, so the new types include the Volutus roll cloud, which has been designated as a whole new species. You can see it gets its name from this long, horizontal, tube-like shape.

    Next one up, we have the Cavum, or the hole punch cloud — this big circular gap which is sometimes caused by aircraft taking off and landing.

    Very easy to see, right? Makes sense there.

    And we also have the Asperitas. These are gorgeous. It’s actually my favorite. It’s kind of looking like waves while you’re underwater.

    I mean, these are actually beautiful. I mean — check these out.

    And then finally, we also have the big surfer waves of the Fluctus cloud. These are actually caused by winds above blowing faster than the winds within the cloud itself.

    So you kind of get that shape. So beautiful, right?

    That’s just a sample of the new additions that we have. Meteorologists, sky watchers, daydreamers — we’re all geeking out, guys.

    What do you guys—

    Backup here with captions added if you prefer:

    A big thanks to our very own Winger for showing me this clip which I had never seen before.

    It's actually from 2017.

    Here's more on the 12 new types of clouds, from the Royal Meteorology Society in 2017:

    On World Meteorological Day (23rd March 2017), the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) released its new, online, digitised International Cloud Atlas, the global reference for observing and identifying clouds. It contains several new cloud classifications, including the eagerly-awaited asperitas, a dramatic undulated cloud which has captured media interest and public imagination. The RMetS originally reviewed examples of asperitas provided by Gavin Pretor-Pinney of the Cloud Appreciation Society.

    The present international system of Latin-based cloud classification dates back to 1802 when amateur meteorologist Luke Howard wrote his essay on the Modification of Clouds. There are ten basic cloud ‘genera’, defined according to where they form in the sky and their appearance. The new Cloud Atlas has made no additions to these 10 genera. High-level clouds typically have a base above about 16,500 feet; middle-level clouds have a base between 6,500 to 23,000 feet; low-level clouds usually have their headquarters at a maximum of 6,500 feet.

  • Alto: mid-level
  • Cirrus/cirro: feathers, wispy
  • Cumulus/cumulo: heaped up/puffy
  • Nimbus/nimbo: rain-bearing
  • Stratus/Strato: flat/layered and smooth

    • The 10 genera are subdivided into ‘species’, which describe the shape and internal structure, and ‘varieties’, which describe the transparency and arrangement of the clouds. In total, there are about 100 combinations.

    The new cloud descriptions

    Species

  • Volutus: A long horizontal cloud shaped like a tube, is typically low in the sky, detached from other clouds and often appears to roll.

    • Supplementary features

  • Asperitas: A well-defined wave-like structure in the underside of a cloud with the look of a roughened sea surface viewed from below.
  • Fluctus: A relatively short-lived wave formation, usually on the top surface of a cloud, in the form of curls or breaking waves (Kelvin-Helmholtz waves).
  • Cavum: Commonly known as a ‘fallstreak-hole’ or  ‘hole-punch cloud’.
  • Murus: Commonly known as a ‘wall cloud’, is a localised, often abrupt lowering of cloud from the base of a Cumulonimbus, from which vortices such as funnels and tornadoes sometimes form.
  • Cauda: A horizontal, tail-shaped cloud that extends at low level from the main precipitating part of a super-cell Cumulonimbus. It is typically attached to the ‘wall cloud’, murus.

    • Accessory clouds

  • Flumen: Bands of low cloud that move towards the updraft of large severe storm clouds. They are organised along the air inflow into the super-cell storm cloud and are not attached to murus.

    • Special clouds

  • Flammagenitus: Cloud formed as a result of rising air currents initiated by the heat from forest fires, wildfires or volcanic activity.
  • Homogenitus: Cloud formed due to human activity; for example, aircraft condensation trails (contrails) or clouds generated by rising thermals above power stations.
  • Homomutatus: Cirri-form clouds resulting from the spreading out of aircraft contrails (Cirrus homogenitus) which, over time, transform into larger areas of more natural-looking cirri-form clouds.
  • Cataractagenitus: Clouds developed locally in the vicinity of large waterfalls due to rising air.
  • Silvagenitus: Cloud developed locally over forests as a result of increased humidity due to evaporation from the tree canopy.

    • If you ask me, 12 is a bit confusing and a lot to memorize, so if it's all the same to all of you, I'll just continue to refer to ALL of these as Chemtrails....

    If You Think Chemtrails Are Just a “Conspiracy Theory”, Just Watch This…

    If You Think Chemtrails Are Just a "Conspiracy Theory", Just Watch This...

    I'm not sure how much clearer we can make it, but I'll keep trying....

    Chemtrails are real.

    They are spraying heavy metals in the sky above you.

    I know that's a tough pill to swallow, but we report the truth here.

    I've been telling you for years.

    Here's the latest, see with your own eyes folks:

    And if that's not enough, how about President Trump literally telling you to your face?

    President Trump Now Exposing Chemtrails?

    President Trump Now Exposing Chemtrails?

    Well, it looks like it's time to retire another "Conspiracy Theory" and move it over into the "Conspiracy FACT" bucket.

    The only problem is, my Conspiracy Fact bucket is getting awfully full these days!  Might need to get a bigger bucket!

    For years, I've warned you about the toxins they're spraying in the skies above us!

    And for years, I would say about 25% of the population has had severe cognitive dissonance on the topic.

    Each time I write about Chemtrails, about 25% of the comments I get are angry.  I mean, really angry!  Irrationally angry!

    And look, I get it.

    To admit that for decades now our Government has been spraying our skies with toxic heavy chemicals and metals, it's almost too much to take in.

    So some people don't take it in....they refuse to accept it's real, claim it's not happening.

    "Those are just CON trails Noah, condensation trails from water vapor made by planes at high and cold altitudes!"

    "Wise up, Noah, take off your tin foil hat!"

    I've heard it all.

    Except now even President Trump is trying to tell you...

    Watch this:

    Backup here:

    He always does this....

    On these big topics where he knows the public will not be able to take it all in at once, he slowly starts leaking out a new idea and that's exactly what he did here.

    Just a short little throwaway line, but he's planting the seed.

    I have no doubt you'll start to hear a lot more from President Trump about this soon, ultimately resulting in full disclosure.

    And then I hope he truly gets to the bottom of this and shuts it down!

    Because it's literally killing us.

    And to all the people who are going to write in the comments section of this article that "it's just water vapor Noah, don't be so dumb" well...all I can say to you is I don't know why they'd literally be passing new laws to ban something that doesn't exist:

    JUST IN: Tennessee Senate Passes Bill Banning Chemtrails

    But it's not just the laws and it's not just President Trump....

    RFK Jr. has been very clear and outspoken on the dangers of chemtrail spraying:

    RFK, Jr.: “We Are Going To Stop The Crime of Chemtrails!”

    RFK, Jr.: "We Are Going To Stop The Crime of Chemtrails!"

    Sometimes it just feels like EVERYTHING is coming together....

    President Trump's team is surging....

    RFK has endorsed and joined...

    We're going after vaccines and autism....

    Election integrity issues being addressed in several swing states....

    Illegal voters being purged from the voting rolls....

    And now the latest -- we're even tackling chemtrails!

    Until just a few years ago, most believed chemtrails were not even real.

    But we've been shouting about them from the rooftops and it looks like our hard work is finally paying off!

    Perhaps RFK, Jr. is a WLTReport reader?

    I wouldn't be surprised!

    Because he just posted this online:

    Here is his actual post, which was a reply to a nasty chemtrails video:

    And here is a screenshot in case that Tweet gets deleted or censored:

    Now, for anyone who is here and doesn't think chemtrails are real, let's do a little education lesson!

    Here's the difference between CONtrails and CHEMtrails:

    You do know it's been widely ADMITTED, right?

    Dubai Admits It: Chemtrails and "Cloud-Seeding" Are Real, Here's How We Do It!

    I've been telling you for a long time that "Chemtrails" are real.

    Many of you are awake and you see it too.

    But there's always a vocal minority that wants to (loudly) argue with me....

    "Those are just CONtrails, you're so stupid!"

    "No one is spraying anything into the sky!"

    "Airplanes have always done this..."

    "That's just a normal condensation trail..."

    "The sky looks normal to me with all these long lines and checker board patters in it!"

    Those are the most common refrains of people who don't want to admit it.

    Others get violently and emotionally angry with me for even discussing it, and still others refuse to even talk about it in the first place because their cognitive dissonance is so strong.

    But the fact of the matter is they are real and obvious to anyone with eyes to see.  Just look up!

    And now it's not only being admitted but fully exposed....

    Check out this new video from Dubai where they proudly brag about their "cloud seeding" operations and even show you the planes that do the spraying!

    Watch:

    Backup here if needed:

    More here from the USA:

    Here's what Grok told me:

    The UAE's National Center of Meteorology (NCM) has conducted numerous cloud-seeding operations in the past. In 2023, the NCM launched a month-long cloud-seeding campaign to improve technologies used to boost rainfall across the country.

    However, it is essential to note that weather patterns and government initiatives can change over time. To get the most accurate and up-to-date information, it is recommended to consult with the local meteorological agency or government sources for the latest details on any cloud-seeding operations in Dubai.

    And this:

    "Cloud seeding" is indeed a real thing. It is a weather modification technique used to increase precipitation by introducing substances, such as silver iodide or dry ice, into clouds. This process aims to enhance the cloud's ability to produce rain or snow. Cloud seeding has been practiced for decades and is currently used in various regions worldwide to address water shortages and drought conditions.

    Gee, spraying silver iodide into the sky....what could go wrong?

    No doubt other heavy metals as well...

    More here:

    “Legacy Media” Now Tacitly Admitting Chemtrails?

    "Legacy Media" Now Tacitly Admitting Chemtrails?

    We've been covering Chemtrails for many years here at WLTReport...

    So I know what kind of reactions I will get each time I publish this type of article exposing the truth behind the Chemtrails.

    A large group of you are awake and have eyes and know that what is happening in the skies above you is NOT normal...

    Another fairly large group of people suffer such extreme cognitive dissonance every time the topic is brought up that they either completely shut down and can't/won't process it, or they become violently and emotionally angry and lash out at me for even raising the issue.

    So I know we'll get both camps in the comments to this article and in my email Inbox.

    But here's what's a little different this time, and what will cause even more distress on the second group of people: the "Legacy Media" aka the MSM is now starting to admit it.

    It's called "soft disclosure" and they're paving the way for it to become public knowledge that yes, the Government has indeed been spraying heavily metals in the air for all of us to breathe in for years now.

    You see, the Government knows what I know....they know about the second group of people.

    They know that eventually this truth will come out -- it has to, one way or the other -- but if it comes out in a big surprise burst, that second, fairly large, group of people will not be able to handle it.

    So they do a "soft disclosure" and they gradually and softly boil the frog ever so slowly.

    Here's the latest....this is NPR starting to get the idea out there to the normies who can't deal with this topic:

    And here's my screenshot to show you it's real:

    Here's an excerpt from that NPR interview:

    AYESHA RASCOE, HOST:

    With leaders from around the world gathered in Dubai for the U.N. climate summit, we wanted to discuss an idea that might sound more like science fiction than science. Could humans cool the planet by reflecting sunlight away from Earth? It's called solar geoengineering, and it is something that scientists are working on, even if we don't hear much about it. Peter Irvine is a climate scientist and teaches at University College London. Welcome to the program.

    PETER IRVINE: Thanks for having me.

    RASCOE: So can you give us a better sense of what solar geoengineering is?

    IRVINE: Solar geoengineering, yeah, as you said, describes a set of ideas to increase the amount of light that the Earth reflects back to space. And that could counter the warming effect of the greenhouse gases we've been adding ourselves. There's a couple of different ideas. The most promising one would aim to mimic the effect of volcanic eruptions.

    So some of the biggest eruptions in history, like Tambora in 1815, Pinatubo in 1991 - the big eruption goes off, and the very powerful ones penetrate up into the stratosphere, which is a high layer in the atmosphere. And there the particles that they release scatter around the entire planet and then reflect light away for a couple of years. And in the years after these big eruptions, we see temperatures dip and then slowly recover. And the idea is that we could create that effect, but persistently, to help offset future global warming.

    RASCOE: So how would this work?

    IRVINE: Yeah. So volcanoes put up a few million tons - the big ones that have this cooling effect put up a few million tons of this gas, sulfur dioxide, into the stratosphere. You could get an aircraft to fly that high, dump this gas and come back down. And with enough of them, you could get millions of tons up. We're talking tens to hundreds of aircraft, so it's not a huge amount.

    And every engineering assessment today comes to the same conclusion. This is feasible and relatively cheap. We could offset basically the difference between where we're headed, which seems to be something like 2 1/2 Celsius of global warming, to where we want to be, which is 1 1/2, or to limit it to that much, at about $20 billion per year, which is a lot of money, but not a lot of money compared to the costs of climate change and the costs of dealing with it.

    RASCOE: How would sulfur dioxide cool the planet? Like, how does that work?

    IRVINE: Just like the volcanic eruption, we would be adding this sulfur dioxide gas, which goes on to react in the atmosphere to form these really tiny droplets. And they're so tiny that they effectively stay suspended in the air. And now, this happens in the lower atmosphere. These little particles are responsible for the haze you see on many days. And they stay suspended until they get caught up in rain clouds and rained out.

    But up in the upper atmosphere, it's very dry. There's no clouds. And so these particles persist for several years until they gradually, slowly fall down. And so yeah, this relatively small amount of material that we could put into the upper atmosphere would have this disproportionately large cooling effect.

    RASCOE: What is the risk from, you know, releasing the sulfur dioxide?

    IRVINE: Well, I think the first thing to note is this is not an alternative to cutting greenhouse gas emissions. The CO2 would still be there. It'd still be having this warming effect on the planet. And this would only be a temporary cooling effect to sort of offset some of the consequences.

    It would also have some side effects similar - well, the same side effects that volcanoes do. The sulfur dioxide adds to acid rain a little. It would delay the recovery of the ozone hole by some time, and it would make the sky a little hazier. But yeah, it would have these side effects, and they're not good. But the question is, it seems that they're a lot less bad than climate change would be.

    And here's the White House playing their part too:


    Source link

    Search