Wednesday, 14 May 2025

Rep. Jasmine Crockett DOUBLES DOWN Despite Pam Bondi’s Warning, Calls for Violence Against Trump Allied Congressman!

100 Percent Fed Up
Hits: 13

Not only is Rep. Jasmine Crockett defiantly ignoring Attorney General Pam Bondi’s warnings…

But she is actually doubling down on the dangerous rhetoric that often does (AND CURRENTLY IS) leading to political violence.

Her recent comments, regarding her upcoming birthday wish, initially called for Elon Musk to be “taken down”.

Even while there are DAILY ATTACKS against Elon Musk’s Tesla facilities, and more threats of violence against Tesla owners, a sitting Congresswoman is openly calling for politically motivated violence!

In case you missed it, here’s the video from a few days ago featuring Rep. Crockett’s inflammatory statements directed towards Elon Musk, which Pam Bondi openly called out:

Even with Attorney General Pam Bondi’s no-nonsense warning to that dangerous call for continued violence against Musk, Crockett has continued ramping up her rhetoric.

Considering the clear warning from the Attorney General in the video below, it is hard to imagine that Crockett is foolish enough to continue ratcheting up her intentionally reckless speech.

Nevertheless, that’s exactly what Rep. Jasmine Crockett has proven herself to be time and time again; both foolish and reckless.

Not only has she completely ignored Pamela Bondi’s warnings as an elected official…

But now she is EXPANDING her violent rhetoric to include Ted Cruz!

Apparently, Rep. Crockett is concerned that Americans believe that the Democratic party looks ‘weak’, as she expressed to the Dallas Morning News and NBC affiliate reporters in Dallas on Sunday.

And that, apparently, means it’s open season on Republicans in order to prove that they’re not as weak (as the election proved they are!).

Crockett very specifically chose to use violent imagery in her Sunday appearance with the two journalists — even after being warned against that very thing by the Attorney General!

She told the news duo during the Sunday interview that “you’re OK with punching” when it comes to Ted Cruz, according to Fox News:

Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Texas, said in a new interview that Democrats need to drop their Mr. Nice Guy routine and start to “punch” in their races against Republicans.

Crockett was blunt when asked how Democrats can win elections specifically in the red state of Texas, reflecting on Rep. Colin Allred’s, D-Texas, loss to Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, in November.

“I think you punch,” Crockett said in an interview when asked how Democrats turn things around. “I think you’re OK with punching.”

Crockett spoke about resistance to the Trump administration in the interview with Lone Star Politics.

“The reality is we’re dealing with an administration that is lawless and disrespectful and so the idea that we’re still going to be nice and friendly and kind and try to look for some sense of normalcy when we’re literally living in a time that is anything but normal. I think that we’ve got to get comfortable with letting our hair down a little bit,” Crockett told NBC 5’s Phil Prazan and Gromer Jeffers from the Dallas Morning News.

Crockett said right now it needs to be clear to voters that Democrats “are not weak.”

“And I don’t know that anybody believes that we’re not weak,” she said.

And although multiple Republican have called Rep. Crockett out for her continued dangerous rhetoric (like Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene did here)…

The fact that that the Congresswoman has not only continued her violent imagery, but expanded her physical target list to include Ted Cruz seems indicative of someone who assumes they are above the long arm of the law.

And, maybe, Rep. Crockett has been exactly that for some time; specifically during the Biden administration.

For four years Democrats could get away with saying almost anything, while Republicans were repeatedly doxed and attacked — and STILL treated as the aggressors!

Hopefully, those days are over… at least for the next few years.

And hopefully we are about to see true justice play out in terms of legal ramifications for those elected officials that continue to consider themselves beyond the reach of the law.

For one thing, calls have increased for Speaker Mike Johnson to censure Crockett, and strip her of her membership on House committees:

Personally, I would much rather see the DOJ file charges along the lines of inciting violence and openly calling for terrorism…

But a Congressional censure would be a good start.

As usual, Crockett is speaking out of both sides of her mouth (as Democrats have been known to do, lately).

Here she is one minute appearing on MSNBC declaring that she has “never” promoted violence “whatsoever”.

Except… yes, she did.

Ted Cruz, not one to stand idly by while someone like Crockett yaps their jaws, came out swinging in response — figuratively, of course.

Calling a spade a spade, Cruz said what we all know.

No one that is part of the “Tesla Takedown” push is simply talking about boycotting Elon Musk’s products.

They’re very openly pushing for a continued wave of politically motivated physical attacks (terrorism…) against Tesla, according to Cruz as reported by the Dallas Morning News:

Cruz pointed to U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Dallas, participating in a “Tesla Takedown” session that encouraged people to protest the automaker. Cruz played a clip from the Daily Show during which audience members cheered news footage of Teslas that had been shot up or set ablaze.

“Every one of these people knows they’re not just talking about declining to purchase this product,” Cruz said. “They are cheering on Molotov cocktails, violent firebombing and firing guns. And I’ll tell you, somebody is going to be killed.”

Crockett joined a “Tesla Takedown” call in which organizers promoted March 29 as a day of Tesla protests. That happens to be Crockett’s birthday.

“All I want to see happen on my birthday is for Elon to be taken down,” Crockett said. “I have learned, as I serve on the DOGE oversight committee, that there is only one language that the people that are in charge understand right now, and that language is money.”

“Obviously everything that I am promoting is nonviolent,” she said.

(Emphasis Added.)

Even though Rep. Crockett added that nice little tagline in an attempt to distance herself from any legal liabilities that might come up when someone takes her words seriously…

She knows full well what she is doing.

As a lawyer, Crockett believes herself to be too smart to be implicated in any actual violence that might spring forth from her words.

I suspect her arrogance reveals her ignorance, and that if anyone is actually hurt — or God forbid loses their life in one of these attacks as a result of her barely concealed calls for violence — the congresswoman could actually find herself facing serious charges at the hands of the DOJ.

Hopefully, it won’t take that outcome for justice to prevail.

But so far Rep. Jasmine Crockett is proving more reckless and foolish with her words by the day — simply adding fuel to the flames which the Left has already built up into a veritable inferno of political terrorism.

RELATED REPORT:

Is Jasmine Crockett Trying To Get President Trump Killed?

Is Jasmine Crockett Trying To Get President Trump Killed?

Jasmine Crockett went on MSNBC today and many are saying she incited violence against President Trump....

This post lays it out very clearly:

Jasmine Crockett is trying to get someone to assassinate President Trump

Listen to her Language…
• Donald Trump is “occupying the White House”
• Donald Trump is an “enemy of the United States”
• Donald Trump is a “Dictator”

This is called Stochastic Terrorism

Stochastic Terrorism refers to when public figures or media outlets use inflammatory rhetoric to demonize a person or group.

They do so knowing it could unpredictably incite lone individuals to commit violence against the target (e.g., Trump), believing they’re acting heroically.

Meanwhile, the instigator maintains plausible deniability for inspiring the act.

What do you think?

Is this acceptable behavior?

Is she trying to get President Trump killed with this inflammatory rhetoric?

I hope DA Ed Martin looks into this:

FULL TRANSCRIPT:

So unfortunately, we have someone occupying the White House, and as far as I'm concerned, he is an enemy to the United States.

He swore an oath just like the rest of us.
But right now, you are literally putting us at risk—all because of what?
Because you want to convince your followers that you should be a dictator too.

That you should never leave the White House.
Because you don't believe that elections should take place.
I don't really understand what is going on, and I don't know what it's going to take to get people to wake up.

RELATED REPORTS:

Does Far-Left Rep. Jasmine Crockett Not Even Know How To Spell Her Own Name?

Meet Jasmine Crockett, Triggered On X — In For a Very Rough Future

Meet Jasmine Crockett, Triggered On X -- In For a Very Rough Future

Meet Jasmine Crockett, an American lawyer and politician currently serving as the U.S. Representative for Texas's 30th congressional district since January 2023.

Her district includes parts of South Dallas County, Central Dallas, Dallas Love Field Airport, and portions of Tarrant County.

She is a member of the Democratic Party and previously served in the Texas House of Representatives for the 100th district.

In the 118th Congress, Crockett was selected as the Democratic freshman class representative, acting as a liaison between the House Democratic leadership and the newly-elected Democratic members.

She was also named as a co-chair for the 2024 Harris-Walz campaign.

And.....she got mega triggered on X today, or her staff did.

Allow me to explain.

Crockett posted this question to X:  "Which branch of Government does Elon belong to? Asking for a friend…."

So I answered her (seemed like the nice thing to do right?  Help a confused woman out, so I did): "He belongs to WE THE PEOPLE. Hope that helps clear it up for you."

Well, Ms. Crockett didn't like that very much and she blocked me moments later!

Take a look:

I have so many questions, perhaps you do too.

First up, why does her profile look like some 1-900 sex phone number that you'd dial up in the 1990s and pay $4.99/minute for?

Look Jazzy, you're in Congress (somehow) not running some illicit, late night, sex line.

I'm embarrassed for you to have that logo!

Second question: are you literally doing nothing other than reading your X notifications?

Aren't you supposed to be working or something?

Or is this one of those 100 days Congress has off each year?

Third question: why does the concept of WE THE PEOPLE trigger you so much?  Why do all the far-left Communists in America hate WE THE PEOPLE so much?

Fourth question: are you really so thin-skinned that you can't handle feedback from WE THE PEOPLE?

In regard to that last question, I believe Ms. "Full-of-Crock"-ett is in for a VERY rough future.

If these people get so triggered that they have to block people who simply answer a question they asked online, then the next four years of massive reform lead by Trump, Vance, Elon and Vivek is going to be extremely rough on them.

Some may not make it.

And no, that's not a threat.  I'm saying some will literally not be able to cope and will drop out of office.  They'll just leave.  That's my prediction.

Because this is the generation that was raised on participation trophies....and DEI.

Everything was handed to them because life must be made FAIR.

Not fairness of opportunity, fairness of outcome.

And when the adults are back in charge, and we return to a meritocracy and we start holding people accountable and asking "What did you get done this week?" -- my hunch is that people like Ms. Crockett will turtle and crater.

Ummmm, what did I get done?

I blocked some patriotic Americans on X!  Yay for me!

"You're fired".

Speaking of DEI, I would NEVER say that good old Jazzy Crocket is a DEI hire, but others have:

Look, I'm not here to take sides.

I'm just a reporter.

A blocked reporter, but a reporter nonetheless.

So watch Ms. Crockett in this video and tell me if this is proper behavior or ghetto behavior?

And before anyone gets all spun up into a tizzy, let's get our definitions clear, shall we?

Google Search, citing to Columbian University, defines ghetto as "behaving in a low-class manner":

So that's the definition and I'm curious to know if you think what you watched in that clip above is proper decorum or ghetto behavior?

And since ghetto behavior simply means "behaving in a low-class manner" I find it wildly rude and racist and offensive that some people would conflate this with a certain race.

Don't bring that garbage around here!

Quite frankly, I think it's very rude and racist for Racist Liberals to suggest that "behaving in a low-class manner" is some how associated with any certain race, so don't bother bringing that racist trope around here, thank you very much!

But anyway, I think that about wraps things up.

I believe Jasmine Crockett and her ilk (the Far-Left hating America constituency) are going to be in for a very rough four years and I think many will simply not make it to the finish line in office.

RELATED REPORTS:

‘You Attacked Her’: Even CNN Host Took Issue With Rep. Crockett’s Insulting Outburst Toward MTG

STAY TRASHY? New Orleans Mayor Proclaims “Back That Azz Up” Day In Honor of Juvenile

This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport.

View the original article here.


Source link

Search