Saturday, 14 June 2025

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene Admits She Did NOT Read ‘One Big Beautiful Bill’?

100 Percent Fed Up
Hits: 8

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) said she was unaware of a section in the ‘One Big Beautiful Bill’ that stripped states of the right to enact laws and regulations regarding artificial intelligence for 10 years.

“Full transparency, I did not know about this section on pages 278-279 of the OBBB that strips states of the right to make laws or regulate AI for 10 years,” Greene said.

“I am adamantly OPPOSED to this and it is a violation of state rights and I would have voted NO if I had known this was in there,” she added.

Full post:

Full transparency, I did not know about this section on pages 278-279 of the OBBB that strips states of the right to make laws or regulate AI for 10 years.

I am adamantly OPPOSED to this and it is a violation of state rights and I would have voted NO if I had known this was in there.

ADVERTISEMENT

We have no idea what AI will be capable of in the next 10 years and giving it free rein and tying states hands is potentially dangerous.

This needs to be stripped out in the Senate.

When the OBBB comes back to the House for approval after Senate changes, I will not vote for it with this in it.

We should be reducing federal power and preserving state power.

Not the other way around.

Especially with rapidly developing AI that even the experts warn they have no idea what it may be capable of.

A closer look:

Image

Image

Greene received lots of criticism on social media for admitting she didn’t know the provision was included in the bill.

Per Mediaite:

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) told NewsNation she agreed with Elon Musk “to a certain extent” after Musk said everyone who voted for President Donald Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill” – including Greene – should be ashamed.

While Greene voted in support of Trump’s controversial bill, the congresswoman claimed on Tuesday that she would not have voted for it had she read a section of the bill that protects artificial intelligence (AI) from state regulation.

ADVERTISEMENT

NewsNation host Blake Burman asked Greene on The Hill, “Congresswoman, you say in full transparency you didn’t know that this was in there and now you’re shining a light on it. How did you not know?”

“Well, we don’t get the full bill text until very close to the time to vote for it, so that was one section that was two pages that I didn’t see,” replied Greene. “I find it so problematic that I’m willing to come forward and admit that those are two pages that I didn’t read because I never want to see a situation where state rights are stripped away, and that’s exactly what it– that’s what it says in that bill text, that it would take away states’ rights to regulate or make laws against AI for 10 years.”

“I’m sorry, but I just can’t stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination,” Elon Musk said Tuesday.

“Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it,” he added.

According to The New York Times, Rep. Mike Flood (R-NE) admitted at a town hall meeting that he didn’t know the bill would limit judges’ power to hold people in contempt for violating court orders.

WATCH:

From The New York Times:

Both Ms. Greene and Mr. Flood have urged Republican senators to strike the provisions that they are concerned about. That may well happen, since both could run afoul of the special rules that Republicans are using to push the legislation through the Senate on a simple-majority vote, shielding it from a filibuster and Democratic opposition. Such bills must comply with strict rules that require that all of their components have a direct effect on federal revenues.

Still, Democrats swiftly criticized Ms. Greene and Mr. Flood for failing to properly examine legislation that both of them had backed and at various points championed.

“PRO TIP: It’s helpful to read stuff before voting on it.” Representative Ted Lieu of California said, responding to Ms. Greene’s post.

ADVERTISEMENT

And throughout the debate on the bill, Democrats repeatedly voiced their objections to the language that would bar states from setting their own regulations on artificial intelligence.

“I even brought this provision up during the debate,” Representative Brendan Boyle, a Pennsylvania Democrat, wrote on social media. “I welcome those on the other side to join me in opposition to it.”

The language that Mr. Flood said he opposed, which could potentially shield Mr. Trump and members of his administration from being held in contempt for disobeying court orders, was part of a larger push by Republicans to address injunctions that have blocked the president’s executive actions.


Source link

Search