A few days ago, Chief Justice John Roberts issued a rare statement in defense of rogue judges, like Judge James Boasberg who tried to block President Trump from deporting hundreds of violent Venezuelan gang members over the weekend.
If you missed it, here’s that statement:
SCOTUS Chief Justice John Roberts just said President Trump’s call to impeach crooked federal judges is inappropriate.
“For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal… pic.twitter.com/I6XAnut941
— George (@BehizyTweets) March 18, 2025
For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose.
Now, this is so strange because SCOTUS typically stays out of politics.
It’s incredibly atypical for a Supreme Court justice to speak out on something like this.
So, why now?
Could it be because Chief Justice Roberts is linked to corrupt Judge James Boasberg?
You see, as it turns out, Boasberg was appointed to serve on the U.S. FISA court by Chief Justice Roberts in 2014 — the very same FISA court that notoriously approved illegal surveillance of President Trump’s 2016 campaign.
Sean Davis pointed out the connection:
John Roberts personally placed James Boasberg on the FISA court that rubber-stamped illegal spy warrants against Donald Trump.
In case you’re wondering why he’s setting his own credibility on fire to defend Boasberg from impeachment investigations.
— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) March 18, 2025
It’s all starting to make sense now, right?
Did y’all know Boasberg, same dickhead that blocked deportation flights targeting Venezuelan gang members, and was appointed by President Obama in 2011, was tapped by Roberts in 2014 to serve on the U.S. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA),
Same FISA that allowed… pic.twitter.com/kDIvylye3Z
— SaltyGoat (@SaltyGoat17) March 18, 2025
Judge Boasberg was an Obama appointment and Chief Justice John Roberts appointed him to the FISA Court in 2014. The corrupt FISA Court later issued the warrants to spy on the Trump team based on evidence they knew was bogus.https://t.co/MEjIUumKfs
— John Parsons (@JohnParson35771) March 16, 2025
Axios confirmed:
Boasberg served as a law clerk in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, after which he was a litigation associate in San Francisco and then in Washington.
In 1996, he joined the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia as an assistant U.S. Attorney, where he served for more than five years and specialized in homicide prosecutions. Then-President George W. Bush in 2002 gave Boasberg his first job on the bench as an associate judge of the D.C. Superior Court, where served in the civil and criminal divisions and the domestic violence branch. He was then appointed to the federal bench in 2011 by then-President Obama. Boasberg served a seven-year term on the U.S. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court starting in 2014. He was appointed by Justice Roberts.
The connection between Judge Boasberg and Justice Roberts is drawing a lot of criticism…
Judge Boasberg is already the subject of an impeachment process.
But, calls are growing for Justice Roberts to be impeached as well.
Take a look at these responses:
Remember that time when the FBI abused FISA to conduct illegal searches 278,000 times and John Roberts didn’t fire a single judge on the FISA courts, to which he alone appoints judges?
Roberts is compromised.
Boasberg is corrupt.
Impeach them both.
Then arrest them for treason.— Shawn Smith – Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes (@ShawnSmith1776) March 19, 2025
Impeach John Roberts.
— mercime (@mercime_one) March 18, 2025
We need to start appointing better. Roberts is compromised
— KAG3-CO (@Kag3C) March 18, 2025
They both need to go. pic.twitter.com/XjNRmIAjBo
— Grizz (@Grizzardofpaws) March 18, 2025
What are your thoughts?
Let us know in the comments…
This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport.
View the original article here.
Source link