Saturday, 14 June 2025

Thousands of Sleeper Cells Programmed To Go Off On June 14th? Here’s What The MSM Is NOT Telling You!

100 Percent Fed Up
Hits: 5

I started this website in 2015 with one simple goal, which remains our Mission to this day: To print the Truth the MSM won’t tell you!

That Mission remains even more relevant today than when we started, and I’ll prove it to you.

This coming Saturday is going to be absolutely massive.

It’s June 14th, 2025.

What’s so special about June 14th?

One, it’s President Trump’s birthday.

ADVERTISEMENT

Two, it’s Flag Day.  (Did you know that?  How perfectly poetic!)

Three, the MSM is not giving this much attention at all yet, but President Trump is hosting a MASSIVE grand military parade in Washington, D.C., the likes of which this Nation has likely never seen before.

More details on that here:

REPORT: Everything You Need To Know About President Trump’s MASSIVE June 14th Military Parade

But what I really want to talk about is what almost no one is talking about....and that is what the Deep State is planning for that very same day.

Folks, I am getting "J6" vibes all over again on this one, but only on a national scale and much larger.

While President Trump is planning something patriotic and historic, the Deep State is looking to co-opt and ruin it with their counter-programming.

They're calling it "No Kings Day" and you can see it right here:

If you don’t think that June 14th is a culmination of everything

Check out http://nokings.org

That is where they are organizing the protests from. It even shows you all the NGOs that are funded by our own govt!!!

ADVERTISEMENT

Below is a pic of all the planned protest slated to occur the 14th..

The Insurrection act must be signed.

We must take back our country

Now do you see why the border was bigger than you could imagine?

Are you seeing it yet?

Here it is, directly from their website:

You know what I see in each one of those circles?

Sleeper cells.

Chaos.

Anarchy.

BLM.

"Summer of Love" 2.0.

Pallets of bricks.

I think what you saw in LA this past weekend and still happening right now is the test run.  They're just getting everything warmed up and turned on.

I believe they want to activate mini-LA riots all across the country next Saturday during Trump's Patriotic Parade and each one of those dots is a sleeper cell in waiting.

ADVERTISEMENT

That's what I see.

Here's what their website says:

Of course their website says it will be 100% "non-violent"....

You know, just like those "Mostly Peaceful Protests" in LA, right?

When I hear that, I am reminded of what the Bible says....

The Bible says when they say "Peace, Peace!" that's when the war drums are coming.

"For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape."
— 1 Thessalonians 5:3 (KJV)

Rising up all across the country?

Sounds like an Insurrection to me!

“CALL THE BALL” — The Insurrection Act of 1807

"CALL THE BALL" -- The Insurrection Act of 1807

I saw this post from my good friend Pepe Deluxe and I thought it was so spot on that I wanted to share it with you.

ADVERTISEMENT

We're on a crash collision course with a Constitutional Crisis at the rate we're going with these rogue District Court judges.

Our Founding Fathers built a brilliant system of checks and balances, but within that system the Executive Branch and it's leader, the President, were given broad authority to conduct certain matters like National Security, Immigration, Borders and International Trade.

They never intended a system where all of the Executive powers could be overridden by any district court judge who disagreed with them.

That's not just my opinion, Steve Bannon recently said we're on pace to have a Constitutional Crisis by Summer:

STEVE BANNON: We Will Have a Constitutional Crisis By Summer

And that's where this post from Pepe Deluxe comes in.

He reminds everyone of the Insurrection Act of 1807 and implies that it might be necessary to invoke it to save this country:

Here's a quick history of how and when it's been used:

Summary of the Insurrection Act of 1807

The Insurrection Act of 1807 is a United States federal law (10 U.S. Code §§ 251–255) that empowers the President to deploy military forces within the United States to suppress civil disorder, insurrection, or rebellion. It serves as an exception to the Posse Comitatus Act, which generally prohibits the use of federal troops for domestic law enforcement.

Key Provisions

  • § 251 – State Request: The President may deploy troops when requested by a state governor or legislature to suppress insurrection.

  • § 252 – Unlawful Obstruction: The President may act without a request from a state if there is unlawful obstruction of law or opposition to federal authority.

  • § 253 – Civil Rights Enforcement: The President may use force to protect constitutional rights when they are being systematically denied and state authorities fail or refuse to act.

  • § 254 – Proclamation Requirement: Before acting, the President must issue a public proclamation ordering insurgents to disperse.

    • Historical Usage

    It has been invoked sparingly:

  • 1957: Eisenhower sent troops to enforce desegregation in Little Rock, Arkansas.

  • 1962–63: Kennedy used it to enforce civil rights in Mississippi and Alabama.

  • 1992: George H.W. Bush used it during the Los Angeles riots after the Rodney King verdict.

  • 2006 Amendment (repealed in 2008): Expanded the law but was rolled back after bipartisan pushback.

    • This actually isn't the first time we've covered it here at WLT Report.

    Three months ago I brought you this -- and perhaps soon the timing is right:

    REPORTS: President Trump Is Planning To Invoke The Insurrection Act!

    REPORTS: President Trump Is Planning To Invoke The Insurrection Act!

    Ok, buckle up folks because I've got a LOT to unpack here....

    A lot of rumors are flying about what President Trump will or won't do soon, and most of it centers around rumors that he will soon invoke these 18th century Presidential Powers like the "Wartime Alien Enemies Act of 1978" or the "Insurrection Act of 1807".

    We covered the first one earlier today:

    President Trump Will Invoke Wartime Alien Enemies Act Of 1798

    Now I want to dig into the other one, because they are, in fact, two totally different things, but rumors are flying about both and I'm seeing a lot of people conflating the two.

    Here's a quick summary:

    Alien Enemies Act of 1798
  • Enacted: Part of the Alien and Sedition Acts, signed into law on July 6, 1798, by President John Adams.
  • Purpose: Allows the President to apprehend, restrain, and deport "alien enemies" (non-citizens from a country the U.S. is at war with) during a declared war.
  • Key Features: It applies only in wartime, targeting foreign nationals deemed a threat to national security. It does not involve military deployment domestically against U.S. citizens.
  • Current Status: Still technically in effect (codified in 50 U.S.C. § 21-24), though rarely used. It was notably invoked during World War I and World War II (e.g., internment of Japanese, German, and Italian nationals).
    • Insurrection Act
  • Enacted: Originally passed in 1807, with significant amendments over time (e.g., 1871 during Reconstruction).
  • Purpose: Authorizes the President to deploy federal military forces or federalize state militias within the U.S. to suppress insurrections, rebellions, or domestic violence when local authorities cannot maintain order.
  • Key Features: Focuses on domestic unrest, not foreign nationals. It can be used in peacetime or wartime and involves military action against U.S. citizens or residents if necessary.
  • Current Status: Codified in 10 U.S.C. §§ 251-255, it remains in effect and has been invoked in cases like the 1992 Los Angeles riots.
    • Key Differences
  • Scope: The Alien Enemies Act targets foreign nationals during wartime; the Insurrection Act addresses domestic unrest, regardless of citizenship.
  • Military Use: The Insurrection Act explicitly involves military intervention, while the Alien Enemies Act focuses on detention and deportation without necessarily requiring military force.
  • Trigger: The Alien Enemies Act requires a declared war; the Insurrection Act can be triggered by civil disorder or rebellion, even absent a formal war.

    • Rumors have swirled since the "Summer of Love" in 2020 that President Trump would invoke the Insurrection Act:

    And quite frankly?  I think he should have during all the BLM and ANTIFA chaos.

    That's exactly what it was made for.

    But President Trump exercised extreme restraint and did not use it.

    That's our first clue as to whether or not President Trump might use it now in 2025....if he didn't use it when BLM and ANTIFA were burning down major US Cities, is it likely he will use it now?  It could surely happen, but let's just say I'm not fully convinced.

    But Liberals are melting down:

    So why is this coming up now?

    Because of an Executive Order signed by President Trump on his first day in office back on January 20th titled: "DECLARING A NATIONAL EMERGENCY AT THE SOUTHERN BORDER OF THE UNITED STATES".

    In that Executive Order was this paragraph:

    (b) Within 90 days of the date of this proclamation, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit a joint report to the President about the conditions at the southern border of the United States and any recommendations regarding additional actions that may be necessary to obtain complete operational control of the southern border, including whether to invoke the Insurrection Act of 1807.

    So to be fair, the Democrats aren't freaking out for no reason....it turns out they actually read the Executive Order -- or at least one person did and then it started going viral.

    And that 90 day period is up on April 20th, but that's just the deadline -- it could happen earlier.  In fact, the report could already be on President Trump's desk, we don't know for sure.

    Fox News had more analysis:

    On his first day back in office, the president signed a litany of executive orders, including one declaring a state of emergency at the southern border.

    According to the order, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Homeland Security have 90 days to submit a report about the conditions at the border and any recommended actions that need to be taken to secure, "including whether to invoke the Insurrection Act of 1807."

    Here’s what the act is, and what it could mean if invoked:

    What is the Insurrection Act of 1807? Dig deeper: The Insurrection Act allows presidents to call on reserve or active-duty military units to respond to unrest in the states, an authority that is not reviewable by the courts. One of its few guardrails requires the president to request that the participants disperse.

    Congress passed the act in 1792, just four years after the Constitution was ratified. Joseph Nunn, a national security expert with the Brennan Center for Justice, told The Associated Press it’s an amalgamation of different statutes enacted between then and the 1870s, a time when there was little in the way of local law enforcement.

    "It is a law that in many ways was created for a country that doesn’t exist anymore," he added.

    It also is one of the most substantial exceptions to the Posse Comitatus Act, which generally prohibits using the military for law enforcement purposes.

    VP Vance Delivers Remarks at U.S.-Mexico Border Vice President JD Vance toured the U.S.-Mexico border Wednesday, meeting with law enforcement to highlight immigration policies that the White House says have led to fewer arrests since Trump’s second term. Accompanied by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and DNI Director Tulsi Gabbard, Vance is among the highest-ranking Republicans to visit the border. After a helicopter tour of Eagle Pass, they visited a Border Patrol facility and joined a roundtable discussion.

    Past use of the Insurrection Act The backstory: Presidents have issued a total of 40 proclamations invoking the law, some of those done multiple times for the same crisis, Nunn said. Lyndon Johnson invoked it three times — in Baltimore, Chicago and Washington — in response to the unrest in cities after the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. in 1968.

    During the Civil Rights era, Presidents Johnson, John F. Kennedy and Dwight Eisenhower used the law to protect activists and students desegregating schools. Eisenhower sent the 101st Airborne to Little Rock, Arkansas, to protect Black students integrating Central High School after that state’s governor activated the National Guard to keep the students out.

    George H.W. Bush was the last president to use the Insurrection Act, a response to riots in Los Angeles in 1992 after the acquittal of the white police officers who beat Black motorist Rodney King in an incident that was videotaped.

    Could Trump invoke the Insurrection Act? Almost anything and everything is on the table during a Trump presidency.

    Big picture view: He’s already fired top Pentagon officials and military lawyers, leading some critics to say the firings are an ominous sign, given that Trump has long made clear his desire to involve the military in his domestic policy goals, including his crackdown on immigration.

    In Congress, which has the power to restrict the use of military force through funding and other authorizations, Republicans are largely on board with Trump’s plans.

    The other side: Democrats in Congress tried to update presidential powers like the Insurrection Act before Trump’s second term but found little success.

    That left them instead issuing dire warnings that Trump now has fewer guardrails on how he could use the military. He has shown an ability to bend institutions to his goals, from a Supreme Court willing to reconsider long-standing interpretations of presidential powers to a military scrubbed of officers and leaders likely to push back on his plans.

    Newsweek had more on what we're hearing from key figures:

    What People Are Saying

    Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, in a recent statement: "The drop in illegal border crossings has been fantastic: 95% since President Trump took office. We'll keep our military at the border until it is entirely closed."

    Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, on X, formerly Twitter, on Monday: "In February, there were just 8,326 apprehensions at the U.S. Mexico border. That is lowest number in recorded history. President @realDonaldTrump has delivered a powerful message and the world is taking notice: America's borders are CLOSED to lawbreakers."

    President Donald Trump, in a March 4 address to Congress: "The territory to the immediate south of our border is now dominated entirely by criminal cartels that murder, rape, torture and exercise total control. They have total control over a whole nation. posing a grave threat to our national security."

    Ruth Ben-Ghiat, a historian and political commentator, on X on Friday: "Americans, Trump is apparently now considering the invocation of the Insurrection Act. He has asked Hegseth & Noem to weigh in on the issue. Autocrats use such measures to speed power consolidation, repress protests and demonstrate force to the world."

    White House spokesperson Kush Desai told Politico in February: "After four years of a lackadaisical approach to border security and immigration, every lever of executive power is now being marshaled to enforce our laws, mass deport criminal illegal immigrants, safeguard our borders, and put American citizens first."

    Brett Wagner, a retired professor of national security decision making for the U.S. Naval War College, in an opinion piece in the San Francisco Chronicle on Wednesday: "Many of us are now holding our collective breath, knowing that the report and what it contains could put us on the slippery slope toward unchecked presidential power under a man with an affinity for ironfisted dictators."

    Here's a deeper analysis on how likely this is to happen:

    What It Would Take for Trump to Invoke the Insurrection Act

    The Insurrection Act (codified in 10 U.S.C. §§ 251–255) grants the president broad authority to deploy federal troops under certain circumstances. Below is an organized overview of the conditions, practical scenarios, administrative steps, political justification, and the likelihood analysis regarding its potential invocation by Trump.

    Legal Triggering Conditions

    For the Act to be invoked, the president must determine that an “insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy” exists. This determination typically falls into one of two categories:

  • State-Requested Intervention (§ 251):
    When a state is unable to enforce its own laws and formally requests federal assistance from its legislature or governor.

  • Federal Law Enforcement Impediment (§ 252–253):
    When domestic disturbances hinder the execution of federal laws or infringe on constitutional rights to the extent that ordinary judicial processes become impracticable.

    • Additional Note:
    No formal congressional approval is required; however, the president must issue a proclamation ordering insurgents to disperse before deploying troops (§ 254).

    Practical Scenarios

    Several potential scenarios might provide a pretext for invoking the Act:

  • Border Security Crisis:

  • Trump’s administration has underscored a southern border emergency.
  • An executive order mandates a report from the Secretaries of Defense and Homeland Security within 90 days (due around April 20, 2025).
  • Should the report cite overwhelming illegal migration or violence (e.g., cartel-related unrest) as an "unlawful obstruction" to federal immigration law, it could justify invoking the Act.

  • Widespread Protests or Riots:

  • Significant civil unrest, such as mass protests against Trump’s policies (immigration crackdowns, tariffs, or D.E.I. rollbacks), could be portrayed as an insurrection if it disrupts federal operations or state governance.

  • State Resistance:

  • If a state—such as sanctuary cities resisting federal immigration enforcement—refuses to comply with federal directives, it might be argued that this obstruction necessitates military intervention.

    • Administrative Steps

    Load More

    This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport.

    View the original article here.


    Source link

    Search