Tuesday, 29 October 2024

Tucker Carlson: “That’s Not Biden…If I Was A Conspiracy Nut, I’d Think It Was a Body Double”

100 Percent Fed Up
Hits: 20

Oh my….did Tucker Carlson just confirm EXACTLY what we’ve been telling you here for over a year?

Yes.

Speaking with Catherine Herridge in a FASCINATING interview, at one point Tucker Carlson said to Herridge: “I knew Joe Biden.  That’s not Biden.  If I were a conspiracy nut, I’d think it was a body double [insert trademark Tucker laugh here].”

Wow!

Watch here:

Full video player here:

Yes folks, it’s EXACTLY what we’ve been telling you.

We’ve simply been saying trust your eyes!

Trust your brain…

Trust your critical thinking….

It doesn’t take a Rocket Surgeon to look at these two men and say the same thing Tucker Carlson just said: One of these men is NOT Joe Biden.

Perhaps NEITHER is Joe Biden….

One Of These People Is NOT Joe Biden

One Of These People Is NOT Joe Biden

Look folks, I don't even know what to tell you about this, so I'm just going to show you.

I don't know what is actually going on with Joe Biden...

I don't really buy into the whole "clones" thing...

I do think there's a lot of merit to the idea that we are seeing different people in masks "play" Joe Biden (I'll explain why in a minute)....

But I do know one thing for sure, and that is this is not the same person in these two photos and only one of these people is actually Joe Biden -- even accounting for aging and so forth:

Yes folks, that picture on the right is a real picture and they just tried to pass that off as Joe Biden.

Do your eyes deceive you?

Or do you trust what you see?

It comes from this photo of "Joe Biden" hanging out with Barack Obama and Jimmy Kimmel:

Yes, they're trying to tell us that's Joe Biden.

Regardless of what you think about whether it's someone in a mask or not, just ask yourself this: can you honestly say you think that looks like Joe Biden?

I can't.

Not even close.

Pictures are worth a thousand words, just watch this for all the different "Bidens" we've seen in the past 4 years, can you really tell me this is all the same guy?

Or this one...

Watch this short clip.

Same guy in all of this?

I'm not here to convince you of anything....

And I'm not here to promote "conspiracy theories".

I'm not even drawing any conclusions here, I'm just asking one very simple question to everyone reading this: WHAT DO YOUR EYES SEE?

Of course we just had this happen earlier this week:

Can Anyone Tell Me What’s Going On With Joe Biden’s NECK Here?

Some think it's Dana Carvey behind the mask:

You Really Telling Me This Guy Isn’t Playing Joe Biden?

Others think Jim Carrey:

Is Jim Carrey Playing Joe Biden In A “Mask”?

Ultimately, I don't know what's going on....

I don't think it's "clones" but I do think Masks are possible.

Why?

Because the CIA told us how advanced they were back in the 1990s.

Did you know that?

I can only imagine how much the technology has advanced in the 35+ years since then.

Check this out:

You Don't Have To Believe In Clones, You Just Need To See This...

For nearly four years now, the world has watched as very strange things have happened to world leaders...

For example, remember Germany's Angela Merkel shaking uncontrollably?

Or how about Hillary having a similar "malfunction" and getting loaded into that van by men in black suits?

Watch here:

And then emerging later that day looking totally different....

That's the best part of all.

Remember that?

Close, but yet so far away.

Or how about Joe Biden?

How about the fact he looks nothing like the Biden of 10 years ago?

Or for that matter, why do there seem to be 3-4 different versions of Biden out there today that all look a bit different from each other?

Strange right?

Ok, so what's going on then?

The most common answers are Clones, Body Doubles, Executed at Gitmo, Actors in Masks.

I think the whole "executed at Gitmo" now a clone stuff is nonsense.

I have never promoted that.

Until I see real evidence of that, I think that's just wacky.

But I don't think it's wacky to say something is going on.

Our eyes do not deceive us.

So....what is it?

As much as I think there is zero evidence for Gitmo/Clones, I think there is a TON of evidence for actors in masks....and I want to show it to you.

You see, that's what we do here.

We don't publish nonsense gibberish with no evidence, but we also don't shy away from stories that are outside the so-called "Mainstream" because that's often where you find the truth.

So that said, please allow me to show you that mask technology is not only real, it's also so advanced you probably have no idea what they are capable of.

Check this out:

Former CIA Chief of Disguise -- "I Briefed Bush Sr. In A Mask And He Couldn't Tell!"

Never in my life did I think the word "Mask" would come to play such an important and prolific role on the world stage.

For 2 years we were forced to wear COVID masks...

But there's also another kind of Mask that has rose to fame.

One that I think will soon get a WHOLE lot more attention.

The Costume Mask.

I've often said on this website that I don't subscribe to the theory that Joe Biden is dead and has been replaced by clones.

Sorry, not going there.

But are there "multiple" Joe Biden's being played by Actors in Masks?

That is NOT an unreasonable thing to believe.

That's not just my opinion, that is former CIA "Chief of Disguise" telling you that Mask technology has become SO GOOD that she briefed President Bush (41) face to face (so to speak) while wearing a Mask and he couldn't tell!

Understand that Bush Sr. was back in the 1990s.

If the CIA had human Mask technology so good in the 1990s that it could fool the President when face-to-face with him, what do you think we have now?

I'll show you some stunning videos below, but first here is more detail from ChatGPT about CIA Former Chief of Disguise Jonna Mendez and her role in creating the most lifelike human masks in history:

Jonna Mendez served as the Chief of Disguise at the Central Intelligence Agency's (CIA) Office of Technical Service in the late 20th century. She, along with her late husband Antonio Mendez, another notable figure in the world of espionage, played an instrumental role in developing innovative disguise technologies and methodologies that substantially improved the operations of field agents.

Jonna's stint in the CIA culminated in the development of groundbreaking disguise technologies, including highly advanced masks that were capable of transforming the appearance of operatives. These masks and disguises were crucial for clandestine operations, providing agents with the means to blend in, avoid detection, and accomplish their missions undetected.

Background

Before delving into the intricacies of Mendez's work with masks, it is vital to understand her professional background. Mendez joined the CIA in the late 1960s. Over the years, she held multiple positions, evolving her skill set and adapting to the changing needs of intelligence operations. She held a critical role in crafting and providing innovative tools, gadgets, and disguises to field operatives, thereby enhancing their operational capabilities.

Evolution of Disguise Technologies

Mendez was instrumental in the evolution of disguise technologies at the CIA during the Cold War. Initially, the art of disguise was rudimentary, relying on wigs, makeup, and changes in clothing. However, the pressing need for more advanced technologies led to the inception of transformative masks that could alter an agent's identity in minutes.

Mendez, leveraging her ingenuity and technical know-how, began exploring latex and other materials to construct lifelike masks capable of fooling even the most vigilant observers. These masks would meticulously replicate facial features, textures, and coloration, allowing agents to impersonate different individuals, irrespective of age, race, or gender.

The Mastery of Masks

The development and utilization of masks under Mendez’s leadership were paramount in ensuring the safety and success of agents in hostile territories. These masks were not mere accessories; they were intricate creations, designed with impeccable attention to detail, taking into account the individual attributes of the wearer and the person they were impersonating.

Mendez’s masks allowed agents to assume new identities seamlessly, altering their appearance so drastically that they could operate in close proximity to people who were familiar with the individual being impersonated, without arousing suspicion. It was the culmination of meticulous craftsmanship, technical innovation, and a deep understanding of human perception.

Technological Advancements

The technological advancements in mask-making during Mendez’s era were revolutionary. The use of advanced materials and technologies facilitated the creation of masks that were not only visually convincing but were also comfortable and breathable, enabling agents to wear them for extended periods. These masks were complemented with elaborate costumes, altered voice modulations, and behavioral training to ensure that the disguise was holistic and unpenetrable.

The advanced masks developed under Mendez's supervision were fitted with realistic hair, precise skin tones, and textures, and could even mimic wrinkles, scars, and other distinctive facial features. The precision and realism of these disguises were unprecedented and marked a significant leap in the art of disguise in espionage.

High-Stake Operations

Mendez’s innovations were particularly critical in high-stakes, sensitive operations where the margin for error was non-existent. The masks and disguise technologies she developed allowed agents to infiltrate hostile environments, gather crucial intelligence, exfiltrate assets, and conduct surveillance without compromising their true identities.

These disguises were also integral in deception operations, enabling agents to manipulate adversaries’ perceptions and actions. The ability to assume multiple identities and operate covertly provided a strategic advantage in the convoluted geopolitical landscape of the Cold War era.

Legacy and Contributions

Jonna Mendez's work has left an indelible mark on the intelligence community. The advancements in disguise technology initiated by her have been integral in reshaping espionage tactics and methodologies. The masks and disguises developed under her watch were not just tools of deception; they were lifelines for operatives working in the shadows, ensuring their safety and the success of their missions.

Moreover, Mendez has shared her knowledge and experiences through lectures, writings, and advisory roles, offering insights into the clandestine world of espionage and the significance of disguise in intelligence operations. Her revelations have not only enriched public knowledge about the workings of the intelligence community but have also highlighted the importance of innovation and technical acumen in the field of espionage.

Modern Developments

While the exact advancements in disguise technology post-Mendez's tenure remain classified, it can be inferred that the field has continued to evolve, integrating newer technologies and materials. The rapid progress in prosthetics, synthetic materials, digital technology, and biometrics may have led to the development of more advanced and sophisticated disguise techniques. Such advancements likely address the challenges posed by modern security measures and surveillance technologies.

Conclusion

Jonna Mendez’s tenure as the Chief of Disguise at the CIA marked a revolutionary period in the field of disguise technology. Her pioneering work in developing advanced, realistic masks significantly enhanced the capabilities of field agents, allowing them to assume new identities and perform covert operations with unprecedented efficacy. Mendez’s intricate masks and disguises were pivotal in several high-stake missions during the Cold War, providing agents with the means to infiltrate, exfiltrate, and gather crucial intelligence without compromising their safety.

Her contributions to the intelligence community extend beyond her innovations, as she continues to educate the public about the role and significance of disguise in espionage. The advancements initiated by Mendez have paved the way for newer innovations, adapting to the evolving landscape of modern espionage and the challenges posed by sophisticated security and surveillance systems.

Jonna Mendez’s legacy is a testament to the amalgamation of artistry, technical prowess, and strategic thinking in the service of national security, highlighting the relentless pursuit of excellence and innovation in the clandestine world of intelligence operations.

Watch this, it's incredible....

Part 1:

And Part 2:

Backups here:

And here:

https://twitter.com/Conspiracy6174/status/1645449850824306691

More here from her TedX talk:

And here from Valuetainment:

And here:

And from our friend Derek Johnson, Rattletrap:

Keep reading below and you'll see even ESPN has technology so advanced no one could recognize Eli Manning playing football in a mask....

Wow!

NEW VIDEO: Fake Joe Biden Mask Exposed?

I've got a brand new video to share with you from our old friend Chris Yoon.

You might remember we used to cover his videos a lot.

He stopped posting for a bit but big thanks to a reader who sent me this latest link of his newest video.

I think it's going to blow your mind, especially around the 8:00 minute mark.

But please watch the whole thing before you comment.

I'm not going to tell you for sure I know there is a man in a mask playing Joe Biden, but I am saying that every day that goes by that becomes MORE likely, not LESS likely.

Especially when you see something like this.

Just....wow.

Also, if you think this is far-fetched, please watch the NEXT video I'll put below this one, showing how ESPN already did the same thing with Eli Manning.

And that was on a football field with running, tackling and massive sweating.

And it fooled everyone.

If they can do that in football, how much easier would it be with "Sleepy Joe"?

And hey, is this why he is so rarely seen in public and always has to "call a lid"?

Is the mast hard to wear for long periods of time?

Does it take a lot of time and effort to put on each day?

So many questions.

For now, I leave it in your hands to watch this and let me know what you think.

Current Joe Biden: real or fake?

Watch this and then decide:

Backup here on Rumble if needed:

Now as promised, I bring you one more video.

If you think any of that is far-fetched, then you probably haven't seen what ESPN already did.

This is wild.

Keep reading...

Don't Believe Biden Is An Actor Wearing a Mask? Then You Have To See This...

Ok look, I'll say right off the bat I don' know for sure what's going on with Biden.

And I'm not one of these people who thinks he was executed at GITMO 5 years ago and is now replaced by a clone.

Not going there.

But...being played by an actor?

Or by multiple actors?

Not far-fetched if you ask me.

Especially considering how different he often looks.

More on that farther down in this article.

But right now I want to show you something that will probably blow your mind if you didn't realize just how good they've gotten with fake face masks.

No, I don't mean COVID face masks.

I mean, an entirely fake face put on somebody.

I saw this clip on ESPN recently of Eli Manning (who is 41) who went "undercover" to Penn State to try and walk on as a college freshman.

You know, about 18 years old.

And guess what?

After the fake face was put on, nobody recognized him!

And here's the other part...they did a full day of football tryouts....running around, sweating, moving, hitting, the full deal.  And the fake face stayed on.

So is it really that hard to believe Joe Biden is being played by an actor made to "look" like Joe Biden?

Think about how often they never let him leave his basement, now why would they want to keep him out of public view so much?

First, because he's a walking gaffe machine.

But second, you probably wouldn't want to have to put on the fake Biden face too often, would you?

I bet not.

So keep him out of public view as much as possible before you have to run out the actor?

I don't folks, I'm not 100% convinced either way, but here's what I do know after watching this ESPN bit: they have the technology and it's not even that hard.

Go ahead and watch this, it's pretty incredible.

Watch till the end when he rips the fake face off in front of the whole team and they are stunned.

Enjoy:

Here's some more footage:

And since we're on the topic, here is Julie Green saying "Biden will soon be unmasked".

Hmmmm.....

Watch here on Rumble:

Now let's take a minute to explore all the different "Bidens" and how they all look so wildly different.

FAKE ACTOR? Can You Spot The Real Joe Biden?

Is this the same man in all 4 photos?

Let's dig in to a very serious question, shall we?

What is going on with Joe Biden?

That's a very open-ended question that could take hours to unpack, but let's just talk about his looks and mannerisms.

Is this the same guy from a few years ago?

I wonder.

And so do many of you because I get your emails and videos.

On that note, a big "thank you" very much to my friend Mark who sent me this video.

It's a comparison of Joe Biden in 2006 vs. now.

The differences are stunning!

Of course you have the shocking mental decline but you also have a man who sounds a lot more like a Republican back in 2006.

Watch this and then keep reading for a deep dive into just how many different "Bidens" there seem to be!

Is this the same man?

Even Sean Hannity is talking about it!

But first, watch this from Rumble:

Now let's dig in deeper...

I'm not making any conclusions here, I'm simply reporting.

I report, you decide.

Anyone else think Joe Biden looks a little...."different"....than he used to?

Of course we all look different as we continue to age.

Reminds me of one of my favorite Mitch Hedberg jokes:

But let's get serious for a moment.

Because seriously, Joe Biden does NOT look much like the guy from 10-15 years ago.

My friend Daniel just posted this video and I had to share it with you:

https://twitter.com/dnajlion7/status/1377340773763411968

If you're having trouble seeing that, you can watch it here on Rumble:

Wanna take it one more level deeper?

Many people are saying the last photo in that video sure does look like Jim Carey pretending to be Joe Biden.

What do you think:

But it's not just "conspiracy theorists" on the Internet asking questions.

Sean Hannity is even starting to question it.

Watch this recent segment where he asks "What happened to Joe?"

Are there two Joes?

Watch Sean here on Rumble:

What do you think?

Leave a comment below.

Want to dive in even deeper?

Let's look at an even older clip of Joe Biden and you tell me if this is the same guy currently pretending to be President.....

Watch:

And since Twitter will no doubt be taking that post down very soon, don't worry I saved a backup!

From Rumble:

Beyond the incredible admission, people are rightly pointing out that the Biden of today does not look or sound much like the Biden of 13 years ago.

Take a look for yourself:

https://twitter.com/Hobocrow1/status/1338960601066872832

And here:

What do you think?

They sure do look different to me!

And while we're on the topic of Biden's admissions (perhaps from a guilty soul?) let's revisit this:

Even a liar tells the truth sometimes!

Mostly when his cognitive ability has declined so much he can no longer keep all the lies straight.

What do YOU think?

Zoom in:

From Fake Biden we move to Fake Whitehouse?

Biden Caught AGAIN Posting From Fake Oval Office Set! Is He Not In The White House?

It happened again folks.

Joe Biden posting videos and messages from an obviously FAKE White House set.

We've covered this before here:

https://wltreport.com/2021/12/24/biden-caught-again-using-a-fake-white-house-set/

And here:

https://wltreport.com/2021/10/07/biden-mocked-for-using-fake-white-house-set-with-fake-windows-rose-garden/

But it just happened again and it's getting REALLY weird.

This all begs the simple question: if you have access to the REAL White House, why do you need to create a Fake set somewhere else?

But let's back up a minute and address the so-called "Fact Checkers".

Or as I like to call them, the Ministry of Propaganda.

Because they don't truly "fact check" jack shit.

Their sole job is to try and sway a story and confuse the public from what is obvious truth.

Exhibit A?

We'll let's go right to a "Fact Check" on the whole Fake White House story from back in October when this first broke.

Back in October, WeLoveTrump was one of the first in the Media to jump on the story of the Fake White House set.

Before it was common news, we posted here at WeLoveTrump that the window behind Joe Biden looked very odd...almost cartoonish in coloration.

Very shortly after that post it was being widely reported that it was indeed a Fake Set of the White House.

In fact, here is one of the photos which was a total BOMBSHELL when it was first released.  It very clearly shows the Fake Set:

And this:

If you go to Facebook to this very day, this is what you see when you load that photo.

"MISSING CONTEXT".

Hilarious folks....

It's a picture and we can all determine the context with our own two eyes!

But the Ministry of Propaganda has to TELL YOU what you can think...

They have to TELL YOU what your eyes are seeing...

So sad.

Here's another one:

Oh what do you know...more "Missing Context".

Friends, let me key you in on a little truth...

I'll translate this for you from Facebook-speak to Plain-English Truth.

Ready?

Missing Context = this is actually 100% true and even we can't BS enough to label it false so we're going to find some minor detail or idea we make up and claim that due to something that has 0.01% impact on the story it is "Missing Context".

Hope that helps.

But it's not just FakeBook and their propaganda...

Let's now go to Reuters who published this "fact check" back in October:

Any rational human-being reading that report would conclude it must be fake news!

See (says Normie Poindexter)....See!  I told you it was fake news that Biden was on a fake White House set!

Except....keep reading.

Let's just skip down to the END of the article where they admit (1) he WAS in fact on a film set, and (2) it wasn't in the White House at all, it was in the Eisenhower Building!

Look:

Compare that first section with the last section...

Even within their own article they are caught lying!

And yet these bastards hold themselves out as Fact-Checkers.

GIVE ME A BREAK!

I've had massive dumps in a toilet that hold more truth that your garbage fact checks.

But I digress...

Let's get back to the story and advance the ball because the Fake Set was just used again!

Here is the new photo released by the White House which they claim is a photo of his call with Ukrainian President Zelensky:

Yes, note that is the official Twitter account.

Notice anything weird?

It's those weird cartoonish colorized windows again!

And what do we see outside them?

TREES WITH LEAVES!

Of course, I don't need to tell you that it's winter in D.C. and no trees have green leaves on them right now.

But just in case, here are two photos from live feeds of the White House taken today and yesterday:

Right, no leaves.

Winter time.

Why in the world would you need to build a FAKE OVAL OFFICE set?

The obvious answer is because you don't have access to the genuine article.

Make of that what you will.

Follow up question: why do they KEEP doing it?

My theory is when they did it the first time, they never thought they would get caught.

We were one of the first to notice and start asking questions, so we take pride in being on the front end of this story.

After they were caught, I think they had two choices:  (1) lie about it and claim it didn't happen, or (2) embrace it and keep doing it and pretend like it was intentional.

They clearly went with Choice #2.

Even Newsweek was brought in to carry water for the second option.

Check out this load of propaganda they published trying to explain why they just HAD to create a Fake Oval Office:

Why was a fake Oval Office built?

The event space is being used for White House events that are being broadcast. The area is bigger than the actual Oval Office, and provides an area for journalists.

Martha Kumar, director of the White House Transition Project explained that this room in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building is being used more regularly due to it being more accessible.

Previously, the room known as Room 450 was used for such media events.

"You have to slug your way up flights of stairs because the small elevators would hold only a limited number of people," Kimar explained to the Washington Examiner.

"That means you often had to walk. White House staff, as well as presidents, would have to make their way there, too, though they had the luxury of an elevator. With its easy access, the South Court site was welcomed by all."

While former White House events director Josh King explained that the use of the new area is down to "PoliOptics."

"Every week in Washington has an element of theater and stagecraft, one side or another working to take full advantage of visual storytelling," King told the newspaper.

"Presidents can fly on Air Force One across the country—or even around the world—for a photo worthy to print on the top of the fold of U.S. newspapers."

King said that the South Court Auditorium is usually a "generic, stadium-style meeting room with four or five rows of seats; space in the back of the room for cameras sitting on tripods; a small buffer area in front of the stage for still photographers to capture the key moment; and handy backstage doors for easy ingress and egress by the principals."

LOL, ok thanks Newsweek.

Got it...they just had to create a Fake Set because the other one had too many stairs!

How long did it take to come up with that line of BS and how many people sat around a table spitballing ideas until you decided that was the best one to run with?

Maybe I'm being too tough.

Maybe it's true!

I'll turn it over to you....what do YOU think?

WATCH: A Glimpse Into Biden's Fake White House Set

Why does he even have this thing?

Many theories abound, but there can only really be a handful of logical reasons why someone would need a fake staged set to mimic the real thing...

Stephen Miller claims that it is a set built around the use of a teleprompter.

I too think that it has something to do with Biden's reported cognitive decline, but I am not sure if the teleprompter is the exact reason.

Let's take a look, and let us know what you think the deal is behind this creepy staged set:

The New York Post comments:

Twitter erupted after Biden was spotted sitting in front of the digital projection window on Wednesday as he held a meeting with business leaders and CEOs on the need to raise the debt ceiling.

Some ridiculed Biden for using a “literal game show set” as president, while others accused him of deliberately trying to deceive Americans into thinking he was in the White House.

 

https://twitter.com/DBark46107258/status/1509627433296674832

Fox News states:

The video set, which was constructed across from the White House in the South Court Auditorium in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, is used by Biden for video conferences and events broadcast online. Featuring professional monitors and lighting.

This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport.

View the original article here.


Source link

Search