All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate Website button below the author’s name (only available in desktop version).

To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.

Click the share button above to email/forward this article to your friends and colleagues. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

Global Research Wants to Hear From You!

***

Since December, 2023 the European Union worked on the legislation that should protect people's bodies, brains and their thoughts against remote attacks by neurotechnologies. On January 26th, 2024, U.S. President Joe Biden released a statement, where he announced a temporary pause on pending decisions of Liquefied Natural Gas exports. Among others it pertained to CP2 project in Cameron Parish, Louisiana which should provide German company Securing Energy for Europe GmbH (SEFE) with 2.25 million tonnes per year of LNG. This decision meant that by the end of a decade the growth of EU's economy could be stopped by shortage of gas and the EU effort to ban the use of remote mind cotrol technologies was for that matter stopped as well. 

On March 31, 2024 the German weekly “Der Spiegel”, the Russian internet newspaper in exile “The Insider” and the American TV channel “CBS News” on its “60 minutes program” published facts which challenged the statement by American intelligence services that the Havana syndrome, the ailment of U.S. government employees, produced according to the U.S. Academy of Sciences report, most probably by pulsed radiofrequency radiation, “was probably the result of factors  that did not involve a foreign adversary, such as preexisting conditions, conventional illnesses, and environmental factors”. In this way the U.S. government was trying to hide the fact that brain activity can be remotely controled by electromagnetic radiation and keep open for itself the option to use this kind of secret weapon. The findings of Spiegel, Insider and CBS News were republished by all the big world media. Evidently the German secret services intended to provoke new investigation of the attacks producing the Havana syndrome in the American congress and in this way possibly end the classification of technologies enabling remote control of the activity of the human nervous system. 

On May 8, 2024 the hearing in the Committee on the Homeland Security of the U.S. House of Representatives, entitled “Silent Weapons: Examining Foreign Anomalous Health Incidents Targeting Americans in the Homeland”, took place. Lieutenant Colonel Greg Edgreen, who ran the investigation of Havana syndrome for the Defense Intelligence Agency, said that the Havana Syndrome was caused by directed energy weapons, pulsing the radio frequency radiation and he called on the U.S. government to start an action against those attacks on the U.S. government employees.

Christo Grozev, a Bulgarian investigative journalist and author, who joined in 2015 Bellingcat as an investigative reporter, said that “we established that Russian government had long standing program of wave weapons including directed energy electromagnetic weapons” which started in the seventies and that the investigative team found out that employees from the unit 29155 of the Russian Institute for Prospective Military Studies used to stay in the countries, where the Havana syndrome attacks occurred. Mark Zaid, American attorney, who represents several patients with Havana syndrome symptoms and who holds a security clearance, said that in 2012 he received from the U.S. NSA unclassified memorandum describing “high power microwave system weapon … designed to bathe a target's living quarters in microwaves, causing numerous physical effects including damaged nervous system” and that overwhelming evidence concerning the Havana Syndrome attacks “are hidden behind classified walls”.

“I am convinced that the evidence that exists in the classified arena directly contradicts the public conclusions expressed by federal agencies,” said Mark Zaid.

Christo Grozev added that

“there is more than one way to achieve this same effect on the human brain and one of the most disturbing denials that I have seen…was an attempt to create the impression that no technology would allow this impact on the human brain, that is provably untrue”.

He, as well, told the Committee that he spoke with former Russian intelligence officer, who told him that they [the Russians] were attacked by the same American weapon already in the eighties [by the way, the Russian politician Vladimir Lopatin, who was fighting for the ban of those technologies by the end of the last millenium, wrote in the book , “Psychotronic weapon and the security of Russia” that psychotronic war is “actually taking place without declaration of war” – note of the author of the article]. Member of the Committee on the Homeland Security on Eliah James Crane asked witnesses, if the use of the same weapons against Russians “might have something to do with part of the CIA's motive to cover up the existence of this tech and these weapons”. Grozev replied “that is a very logical possibility”. Mark Zaid replied to the question whether there are other people than U.S. government employees in the USA, who complain about Havana Syndrome attacks:

“There are many people, who believe they are victims of AHIs [anomalous health incidents]. All you have to do is to look at my Twitter feed, whenever I post on the topic”.

Member of the committee Eric Swallwell, who sat for eight years on the Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives contributed to the discussion by recalling his meetings with the victims he met:

“they were exposed to this condition, when you meet with the victims it is completely debilitating. It changes your life it turns it upside down and if you are a young parent life is already disorienting and if you are subjected to this, it's even more difficult to be a parent”.

At the question by representative Crane whether they do know about victims who passed away, both Zaid and Edgreen replied: “I do”. Grozev said as well that he had seen this weapon in 1991 [at that year he was 22 years old and living in Bulgaria, where he was born and since 17 years of his age working as a journalist – possibly his father was an itelligence officer or he already cooperated with Bulgarian intelligence service at this age]. Then the discussion turned to the classification of those weapons and results of their use with no clear decision as to whether this technology should be declassified.

Not many world big media published articles on this hearing. One of them was British newspaper The Guardian. The American ABC News wrote: Lawmakers on the committee promised to continue to examine these claims and hear more from the witnesses in a classified setting and The Washington Examiner wrote:

“Intelligence community leaders must be called to testify in public. While they will likely hide behind classifications in order to avoid offering uncomfortable answers, their inability to answer basic questions supported by now-public reporting will catalyze Congress to take further action“.

Were CBS News reprimanded for their previous publication of doubts concerning statements of U.S. spy agencies and for that matter did not report on this event? Were other media warned that the U.S. government does not wish to solve this issue? Evident solution would be to work toward the international ban of mind control technologies, but this does not happen. It is clear that the world superpowers hope to control the world population with those tehnologies and for that matter they continue their competition and secret world war. 

The Homeland Security Committee did not address the whole extent of effects that impact of physical fields can produce in the human brain. Commander Cornelis van der Klaauw from Royal Netherlands Navy, and Expert from Strategic Communications and Information Operations NATO Joint Warfare Centre, wrote in an article in 2023:

“The reason why cognitive attacks go unnoticed by their targets is that cognitive activities bypass the conscious mind and directly target the subconscious of a person… most of our decisions are made by our subconscious… Cognitive attacks are aimed at exploiting emotions rooted in our subconscious, bypassing our rational conscious mind“.

Russia, China and the USA operate systems that can be used to control brain activity on large areas of the planet by producing in ionosphere electromagnetic waves in the frequencies of the brain activity, as well as satellites and cell phone systems can be used for the same purpose.

At present time, all the ordinary people can do to prevent this from happening, is to sign the petition to the European Parliament supporting its effort to ban “AI systems that manipulate human behaviour to circumvent their free will and “AI systems used to influence the outcome of elections and voter behaviour“ and ask it to extend this legislation to ban remote manipulation of human brains by physical fields producing in the nervous system electrical currents in frequencies of its activities. Sign here.

*

Note to readers: Please click the share button above. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

Mojmir Babacek was born in 1947 in Prague, Czech Republic. Graduated in 1972 at Charles University in Prague in philosophy and political economy. In 1978 signed the document defending human rights in  communist Czechoslovakia „Charter 77“. Since 1981 until 1988 lived in emigration in the USA. Since 1996 he has published articles on different subjects mostly in the Czech and international alternative media.

In 2010, he published a book on the 9/11 attacks in the Czech language. Since the 1990‘s he has been striving to help to achieve the international ban of remote control of the activity of the human nervous system and human minds with the use of neurotechnology.  

Featured image source