by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

As the corporate and alternative media report their headline news today that Biden has now approved long-range missiles to be used inside Russia, what should be the REAL headline news is that hundreds of people, including women and children, were massacred over the weekend by U.S. and Israeli bombs in Gaza and Lebanon, and now extended into Syria as well.

Here is a report that is less than 2 minutes long about just one of these attacks, a school in northern Gaza.

Here is another report from TRT World that is less than 2 minutes long, reporting the same event and others that also happened over the weekend with footage from people on the ground there.

In the following interview with Ori Goldberg, a Jew who lives in Tel Aviv, Ori responds to the question as to what Israel’s “end game” is in these attacks, which he reports is for Israel to “have permission to do whatever they want“, which is something the new Jewish President, Donald Trump, has already promised them on Day 1 of his administration.

How Significant is Biden’s Announcement to Allow Long-range Missile Attacks by Ukraine inside Russia?

As I looked at all the headlines and news articles from yesterday through today about Biden’s new announcement that the U.S. was now allowing Ukraine to use long-range missiles to launch attacks inside Russia, I noticed how almost all of the media, including the English Russian media, were using the term “World War” in conjunction with this announcement.

And while I am not denying that this is a very dangerous policy change, my concern is that this is probably being overstated when almost all of the media is reporting almost the exact same thing, and that a future event that has not even happened yet is getting more press coverage than what has already happened this past weekend with the slaughter of innocent women and children in the Middle East.

The best coverage that I have found so far that seems to be fairly neutral, comes from an article published on TRT World this morning.

Can US long-range missiles change the course of Russia-Ukraine conflict?

With the number of missiles available remaining unknown, analysts feel that the US decision is unlikely to change the trajectory of the war.

On November 17, the Biden administration made a significant policy shift, granting Ukraine permission to target Russian territory using US-supplied long-range missiles.

The decision entails permission to utilise Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS), weapons previously withheld due to concerns over escalating the conflict with Moscow.

US officials said the aim was to send a message to North Korea, amid reports that Russia has enlisted over 15,000 North Korean troops to bolster its efforts in Ukraine.

Ukraine is expected to use the missiles to strike Russian and North Korean troops, particularly in Russia’s Kursk region, where Kiev’s forces have gained control of over 1,000 square kilometres.

However, the limited supply of missiles is unlikely to be a game-changer, according to experts.

“We don’t know how many rockets will be made available to Ukraine. It had previously been stated that the number was limited, and that was cited as a reason for not supplying them earlier to Ukraine because there’s just simply not enough,” Peter Zalmayev, the director of the Eurasia Democracy Initiative, tells TRT World.

“And so the effectiveness of this is very much in doubt.”

The decision runs the risk of “opening another front on Ukrainian territory,” according to Stefan Wolff, a professor of international security at the University of Birmingham.

“While it is unlikely that Putin would go directly after NATO countries now, Russia most likely has the capability to exact a high price on Ukraine, potentially even pre-emptively, before Kiev can land any blows”, he says.

“Russian troops and equipment deployed in Kursk could simply be used to push further into Ukraine once Ukrainian forces were driven out of Russian territory.”

The decision comes two months before President-elect Donald J. Trump takes office, which might suggest that Biden is signalling to Trump and his supporters the importance of maintaining strong ties with allies, amid expectations that the incoming president-elect may abandon such policies. (Full Article.)

Ukraine forces have already been inside Russia since August, with their offensive into the Kursk region where tens of thousands of Ukrainian troops have already reportedly been killed, so authorizing missile strikes in that area to counter the alleged North Korean troop buildup there, is not headline news in my opinion, given what is currently going on with the genocide and ethnic cleansing in the Middle East which has significantly escalated since the Trump presidential victory during the past several days.

It’s All About the Zionist Cult Now and Destroying Anyone who Stands in the Way of Full Support of Israel

As I and many others have been reporting since Trump won the elections, anyone who wants a place in Trump’s administration must either be a hardcore Zionist, or support the Zionist agenda.

And understanding this principle will perhaps shed some new light on the current battle for the Treasury Secretary.

A news story that I have not yet seen referenced in the U.S. media, but published in the English Arab news media, sheds new light on how the Treasury Secretary will possibly have a huge influence over silencing anyone who does not support Israel, based on a proposed bill in Congress authored by Zionist Congresswoman Claudia Tenney from New York, H.R. 9495: Stop Terror-Financing and Tax Penalties on American Hostages Act.

Congress bill H.R.9495 sparks concerns over abuse of power

The bill allows the Treasury Secretary to label organizations as “terrorist-supporting” without evidence, placing the burden of proof on the accused and giving them just 90 days to clear their name.

Several nonprofit organizations and NGOs including Oxfam, Amnesty International, the Council on Foundations, Independent Sector, and the National Council of Nonprofits, have opposed Section 4 of bill H.R.9495, which is up for voting in Congress.

In a joint statement, the organizations say they oppose section 4 of the bill and its predecessor, H.R.6408.

Section 4 of the bill H.R.9495 is receiving major backlash due to concerns about potential abuse of power and threats to due process.

What is bill H.R.9495?

The disputed bill would empower the Secretary of the Treasury to designate section 501(c) charities as “terrorist supporting organizations” at his or her discretion, without having to provide any evidence or explanations with the accused NGOs.

501(c) charities include any tax-exempt organizations like news outlets, colleges and universities, and civil society groups and deprive them of tax-exempt status.

Furthermore, the bill breaches constitutional due process safeguards by shifting the burden of proof onto the accused group and giving organizations only 90 days to prove their innocence before losing their tax-exempt status.

The measure may unfairly punish charity groups that legitimately offer humanitarian aid in crisis zones, even if they have necessary authorizations from the US government, which now shields such operations under sanctions legislation.

The organizations opposing the bill are calling for revisions to ensure due process protections and prevent the abuse of power by the executive branch.

A joint statement by the Council on Foundations, Independent Sector, and the National Council of Nonprofits expresses that the organizations have no issue with postponing tax deadlines for those unlawfully or wrongfully detained or held hostage abroad and support stopping bad actors from “using nonprofit organizations to fund terrorism.”

However, they argue that the legislation also “includes language from H.R.6408 that creates redundancies and confusion while providing the executive branch with expansive new authority that could be abused.”

The organizations contend that such accusations would do irreversible harm to their operations and image, losing access to banks and other financial institutions, as well as the confidence of contributors and the communities they serve, and those receiving help would suffer the most.

Paul O’Brien, Executive Director at Amnesty International USA, expressed that in other contexts, the legislation would be exposed as an obvious play from an “authoritarian leader’s playbook,” detailing how officials would not need reason nor evidence to designate groups.

O’Brien warned that “Members of Congress must recognize the danger posed and vote down this bill that could shrink civic space and silence civil society organizations.”

The news is especially alarming considering how the incoming US President Donald Trump formerly vowed to deport student protesters from the US and crush pro-Palestine protests on US campuses.

Referring to the pro-Palestine movement on college campuses, Trump vowed that if he was elected, “we’re going to set that movement back 25 or 30 years.”

Furthermore, Trump’s recent cabinet picks have not shied away from their support of “Israel,” prompting many to fear that dissent will not be tolerated. (Source.)

There are other bills pending approval in Congress to combat “antisemitism” and free speech that could easily fly through both the House and Senate for Trump to sign, but this one specifically lays the power to restrict speech with the Treasury Secretary.

One would think that this would then benefit the Jewish Billionaire and transition co-chair Howard Lutnick, who is also supported by Elon Musk and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., but apparently Trump has issues with Lutnick, since Lutnick stated that there was no way RFK, Jr. would become the Secretary of HHS, but Trump appointed him anyway for that position.

Trump reportedly wants a Treasury Secretary that will assure him to support his idea for tariffs of 60% on Chinese imports, which if enacted immediately, would crush the U.S. economy.

But if the new Republican political sweep will now get H.R.9495 enacted and give the Treasury Secretary power to crush dissent against Israel, then the importance of this appointment is even more significant than what is currently being reported in the U.S. media.

And remember, the heart of Zionism is a denial of Jesus Christ as the Jewish Messiah, and just as the Satanic Jews did in the First Century as recorded in the New Testament portion of the Bible, where they hunted down the Godly Jews to kill them and put them in prison for daring to claim that Jesus Christ was the Messiah, we can expect the same thing today, if the Satanic Zionists get total control of the U.S. Government, which seems imminent now.

Brother will deliver brother over to death, and the father his child, and children will rise against parents and have them put to death, and you will be hated by all for my name’s sake.

But the one who endures to the end will be saved. (Matthew 10:21-22 – Jesus speaking about the Satanic Jews of his day, whom, he said, would include members of our own families.)

See Also:

Understand the Times We are Currently Living Through

American Christians Want a New Jewish King to Become Slaves Instead of Serving Jesus Christ in Freedom

Where is Your Citizenship Registered?

American Christians are Biblically Illiterate Not Understanding the Difference Between The Old Covenant vs. The New Covenant

Exposing the Christian Zionism Cult

Jesus Would be Labeled as “Antisemitic” Today Because He Attacked the Jews and Warned His Followers About Their Evil Ways

Insider Exposes Freemasonry as the World’s Oldest Secret Religion and the Luciferian Plans for The New World Order

Identifying the Luciferian Globalists Implementing the New World Order – Who are the “Jews”?

The Brain Myth: Your Intellect and Thoughts Originate in Your Heart, Not Your Brain

Fact Check: “Christianity” and the Christian Religion is NOT Found in the Bible – The Person Jesus Christ Is

Was the U.S. Constitution Written to Protect “We the People” or “We the Globalists”? Were the Founding Fathers Godly Men or Servants of Satan?

Source link