Monday, 19 May 2025

FDA Fully Approves Novavax COVID Vaccine Grown In Infected Insect Cells


FDA Fully Approves Novavax COVID Vaccine Grown In Infected Insect Cells

100% efficacy claim based on just 14 placebo cases

This post was published by Jon Fleetwood. Please visit his Substack and subscribe to support his work. Follow Jon: Instagram @realjonfleetwood / Twitter @JonMFleetwood / Facebook @realjonfleetwood

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted full approval to the adjuvanted COVID-19 vaccine Nuvaxovid, produced by Novavax, according to a May 16, 2025, approval letter obtained by this publication.

But while headlines tout the vaccine as a safer, more traditional alternative to mRNA injections, the FDA’s approval rests on alarmingly thin evidence—including just 14 moderate-to-severe COVID-19 cases recorded in the placebo group and zero in the vaccine group during the pivotal phase 3 trial published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

In other words, this “100% efficacy” claim against severe disease—the centerpiece of Novavax’s approval—was based on just 14 cases.

This means the entire foundation of the FDA’s approval rests on a statistically fragile outcome that could collapse with just a handful of different results—hardly a robust basis for authorizing a biologic product for mass use.

The vaccine contains recombinant spike protein produced in insect cells (from Spodoptera frugiperda, or fall armyworm) and is combined with the Matrix-M adjuvant derived from saponin extracted from tree bark.

It is now authorized for:

  • Adults 65 and older, and
  • Individuals aged 12–64 with at least one underlying condition said to put them at risk for severe COVID-19.
  • What the NEJM Trial Didn’t Show

    While the trial boasted over 90% efficacy against mild COVID, it only followed patients for a median of 3 months, and all cases of “severe” disease occurred in the placebo arm—a tiny sample that didn’t include a single vaccinated individual over 65 experiencing severe disease.

    Additional red flags:

  • No efficacy data on Delta, Omicron, or newer variants. The trial ended before those strains emerged.
  • Zero measurement of transmission or infection rates—only symptomatic illness.
  • Effectiveness in Hispanic participants was drastically lower: just 67.3% with a confidence interval that dipped as low as 18.7%, bordering statistical irrelevance.
  • Post-Marketing Red Flags: Myocarditis, Anaphylaxis, Menstrual Issues

    Australia’s post-market surveillance study, cited in Eurosurveillance, revealed serious concerns not seen in trials:

  • Pericarditis (inflammation around the heart): 19.4 per 100,000 doses.
  • Chest pain: 91.3 per 100,000 doses.
  • Anaphylaxis: 7 cases—all in women—despite no anaphylaxis in trials.
  • Menstrual disturbances: reported but not tracked in the trial at all.
  • Death temporally linked to vaccination: 4 reported, but all dismissed as unrelated without detailed investigation.
  • How Nuvaxovid Is Made: Insect Cells and Engineered Viruses

    Nuvaxovid (NVX-CoV2373) uses a recombinant protein vaccine platform, which is fundamentally different from mRNA vaccines—but still raises serious biological and regulatory questions.

    Nearly all Sf9 cell lines are persistently infected with Sf-rhabdovirus, an RNA virus recently discovered to be nearly universal across global supplies.

    1. Insect Cells as Factories

  • The spike protein in Nuvaxovid is produced inside insect cells from the Spodoptera frugiperda species (a moth), specifically a cell line called Sf9.
  • These cells are cultured in large bioreactors to act as biological “factories” that churn out massive quantities of protein.
  • 2. Genetically Engineered Baculovirus Infection

  • The Sf9 insect cells are intentionally infected with a recombinant baculovirus—a virus that’s been genetically modified to carry the code for the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.
  • Once infected, the insect cells begin producing the full-length, prefusion-stabilized spike protein, which is then harvested and purified for use in the vaccine.
  • Contamination from these insect cells makes it into the vaccine and therefore the vaccinated.
  • 3. Protein + Adjuvant = Final Vaccine

  • The harvested spike proteins are combined with Matrix-M, a saponin-based adjuvant derived from the bark of the Quillaja saponaria tree, which is said to boost immune response.
  • Why This Matters

  • Residual DNA Contamination Risk: Even with purification steps, it’s possible for fragments of insect cell DNA or baculoviral DNA to end up in the final product. This is a known issue with recombinant protein biologics and must be monitored due to theoretical risks of insertional mutagenesis or immune activation.
  • Genetic Modification: The baculovirus used is a genetically engineered organism (GMO). This process qualifies Nuvaxovid as a genetically modified biologic, even if it’s not based on mRNA.
  • Regulatory Transparency: Most people have no idea they’re receiving a product derived from insect-virus genetic engineering, raising serious informed consent concerns.
  • Spike Protein Concerns: The vaccine still introduces the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein—the same spike many researchers link to vascular inflammationimmune dysregulation, and long COVID–like symptoms.
  • FDA Skipped Advisory Committee Review

    The FDA confirmed it did not convene an advisory committee, stating the data “did not raise concerns or controversial issues.”

    This despite known post-market risks of myocarditispericarditisatrial fibrillationcranial nerve damage, and cardiac failure—all requiring mandatory 15-day reporting through VAERS for the next three years.

    Long-Term Risk Studies Deferred for Years

    The FDA is deferring pediatric studies until 2026–2031 and requiring post-approval studies on:

  • Myocarditis and pericarditis outcomes (due by 2032)
  • Atrial fibrillation and strokes (due by 2028)
  • Pregnancy safety outcomes (due by 2027)
  • Bottom Line

    A genetically engineered insect-cell-based COVID shot that caused chest pain, heart inflammation, and menstrual disruption in post-market surveillance just got full FDA approval—based on 14 cases and no severe COVID cases in the vaccinated arm.

    The FDA didn’t even convene an expert panel.

    The public deserves to know: This was not a thorough or reassuring approval.

    Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.

    0
    0
    1
    0
    Share 0
    Tweet 0
    Pin it 1
    Share 0

    Source link