New Yorker Pushes ‘Queering’ Classic Kids’ Books to Skirt LGBTQ ‘Banishment’
Leftist Legacy rag The New Yorker is suggesting that in order for children to continue being exposed to LGBTQ ideology under a Trump Presidency, school libraries should “smuggle in queer-friendly themes” in the guise of classic children’s books.
There’s a lot to unpack here.
Firstly, why should children be exposed to this at all?
If overtly L.G.B.T.Q. books continue to be banished from library shelves, then it may be left to older works like “Ferdinand the Bull” and “Frog and Toad” to smuggle in queer-friendly themes. https://t.co/IJAaswOVZe
— The New Yorker (@NewYorker) June 3, 2025
Secondly, nothing is being “banished,” it’s just that the majority of Americans don’t think having groomer stuff in schools is acceptable.
Thirdly, classic books are not “queer,” you’re just claiming they are.
So, instead of irking parents with titles such as Gender Queer and And Tango Makes Three, which is about two gay penguins having a baby, the publication suggests schools should stock Ferdinand the Bull and Frog and Toad which are classic books about friendship.
It’s insane to have to point this out, but the frog and the toad are not gay lovers and never were. They’re just mates.
Please stop trying to teach small children about sex
— Enguerrand VII de Coucy (@ingelramdecoucy) June 3, 2025
Everyone hates you and you deserve it
— Magills (@magills_) June 3, 2025
I bet you think this sounds normal
— Jim Muessig (@JimMuessig) June 3, 2025
Ferdinand the bull also has nothing to do with transing kids.
Ferdinand the Bull is vastly superior to the sexual grooming books the radical “queers” are pushing on to gay youth; Ferdinand teaches young people that they are fine just the way they are, not that they need act out sexually or medically alter their bodies.
— Joseph Jones (@JoeGayHistorian) June 3, 2025
What the New Yorker is essentially saying is…
"We will have to secretly indoctrinate the children instead of being open about it!"
— Corporal Punishment (@CplPunishment_) June 3, 2025
Ironically, they’re saying the frogs have turned gay.
Are you saying that Alex Jones was right? pic.twitter.com/OrWPJzykMb
— Smoke yer Joyful Cheap Fake (@Jlisa42067) June 3, 2025
What is the charge? Enjoying a bike ride? A hetero tandem bike ride? https://t.co/WWmrSJNGJO pic.twitter.com/VGv44i9Gw7
— protomemetic (@protomemetic) June 3, 2025
Frog and Toad? What is wrong with those people that they find the idea of relationships without sex incomprehensible? https://t.co/a1JpkOijA4
— Patrick (@notstpaddy) June 3, 2025
Why are so many of you so intent on introducing sex into schools? What does this say about you?
— Just Carmen (@Carmen50) June 3, 2025
We see you.
Why is it so important to you for schools to have gay porn in their libraries? https://t.co/lWckzRsEul
— Bonchie (@bonchieredstate) June 3, 2025
When I go to bookstores I often go to the kids section out of curiosity to see what the market looks like for children’s books.
— Caleb Wayne (@DemocraticDesp1) June 3, 2025
At some locations, a good 50%+ are explicitly political, racial, or sexual. It’s bizarre. https://t.co/AE8AnlRaNY
Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.
Source link