Tuesday, 26 November 2024

Instead of adding PINK RIBBONS to products for “Cancer Awareness” month, companies should actually remove the ingredients that CAUSE cancer


The Cancer Industrial Complex of America loves to stick, print and pin pink ribbons on millions of products during “Cancer Awareness” month, and often on products that contain carcinogens that cause cancer in the first place, like fried chicken and alcoholic beverages loaded with sugar, artificial flavoring, and even diet drinks laced with aspartame. It’s all just one huge superficial “movement” to make people aware of something they are well-aware of already, since cancer strikes one in every three Americans, and only half of those afflicted survive it.

As we all know, the Cancer Industrial Complex makes a fortune from diagnostics, multiple surgeries, chemotherapy, radiation, prescription medications, and then they tell the patient they are in remission, only to have the cancer often return later with a vengeance.

How about at the next “Cancer Walk” or “Run for the Cure” 5K, all the participants make lists of every toxic product they know about or toxic ingredient, and the sponsors vow to remove these from all their products and send letters to corporations to also hop aboard the health train, instead of selling everyone products that cause cancer while everyone eats and drinks carcinogen-loaded products at the cancer awareness events.

Maybe all the pink ribbons at cancer drives and on products should list the ingredients that are known carcinogens, synthetics, GMOs

It’s rather shocking how many people, even health-conscious ones, still don’t really know what GMO means. They know what it stands for, but they don’t understand what happens in the lab, in the crop fields, and to their body after they eat them. Most of the pink ribbons tacked onto products during cancer awareness months and at the cancer drives are on products that contain genetically modified ingredients.

This means that genes from toxic plants are genetically embedded into the seeds of edible plants, crops and produce, in order to kill worms, beetles and other insects that eat away (pun intended) at the corporate profits and yields. Meanwhile, these GMO foods still create these toxins in the human gut, decimating good gut bacteria (flora and bifidobacteria), which leads to lowered immunity, irritable bowels, and… cancer.

That means you’re “eating cancer” while you walk or run to “find the cure” for it. Would you eat poison ivy while you try to find a lotion at the store to get rid of it? Would you drink some Mike’s Hard Lemonade while you march for the cure for alcoholism? Sounds really stupid, huh? So much for eating fried chicken from pink buckets at the next Komen for the Cure march.

There’s one sure-fire way to get these corporations to remove cancer-causing ingredients from their products, and it’s not sticking a pink ribbon or pink sticker on them. You simply boycott everything that’s processed with carcinogens. Stop buying their products and they stop making money. Period. End of story.

Buy organic. Eat more whole foods. Buy local. Spend the little bit of extra money on the real “cure” for cancer, which is eating clean, filtering your water, taking supplements, eating superfoods, using medicinal mushrooms, and buying non-toxic products to clean your home, clothes, hair and skin. This is key. This deserves careful consideration.

Next time there’s a walk or run for the cure, ask the event organizers who the sponsors are, and what products will be given away or sold at the event. Write the companies of those products if they contain toxic ingredients, like artificial colors, artificial flavors, aspartame, fluoride, MSG or GMOs. Get the event organizers to consider only clean products, and then those pink ribbons will actually mean something helpful.

Tune your food news frequency to FoodSupply.news and get updates on carcinogenic ingredients in food that persist while the Cancer Industrial Complex puts pink ribbons on everything and pretends that they care. #MarchForCleanFood

Sources for this article include:

NaturalNews.com

PubMed.NCBI.NLM.NIH.gov


Source link