Bill Gates has rolled out yet another product that damages male fertility and reproductive organs as his quest to quietly reduce the global population continues.

Backed by Gates, the dairy cow feed additive “Bovaer” has reignited debates about the motives behind Gates’ investments in global agricultural and health initiatives, with critics claiming they align with his long-stated interest in population reduction.

The uproar began after dairy giant Arla Foods announced a partnership with UK supermarkets, including Tesco and Aldi, to trial Bovaer on 30 British farms, with plans to sell the milk to millions of British families.

While the additive, which reduces methane emissions from cows by 27%, has been hailed by environmentalists as a breakthrough in combating climate change, social media erupted when it was revealed that the product’s safety profile included a potential warning: “may damage male fertility.”

Gates, who has invested heavily in agricultural and climate technologies, has previously faced accusations of leveraging his vast resources to push population-reducing agendas.

From his vocal advocacy for synthetic meats to controversial investments in mRNA vaccine development, Gates’ initiatives consistently seem to focus on reducing global population under the guise of sustainability and public health.

The billionaire has openly discussed his vision for population reduction in past interviews, stating that advancements in health care, particularly vaccines, can “reduce population growth.”

This rhetoric, combined with his significant influence over global health and environmental policies, has fueled suspicions that his investments prioritize eugenics-like goals over genuine solutions for humanity.

The environmental justification for Bovaer appears straightforward: cows emit methane, a potent greenhouse gas, through their digestive processes, and reducing these emissions could mitigate climate change.

However, Gates has previously suggested a shift to synthetic beef as a more sustainable solution, raising questions about whether Bovaer is a stepping stone toward phasing out traditional livestock farming altogether.

In January 2023, Gates outlined two potential solutions for livestock emissions: “fix the cows” or “make beef without the cow.” His investments, including $12 million in the Australian start-up Rumin8, which develops supplements from synthetic seaweed, and the Millennium Seed Bank Project, reflect his determination to seize total control of the global food supply chain.

RELATED: Dutch Gov’t Admit Pandemic Was ‘Military Psy-Op’ To Prepare Public For ‘Extreme Depopulation’

Arla’s announcement prompted a wave of online backlash, with the hashtag #BoycottArla trending on social media. Critics labeled the trial as an experiment on “human guinea pigs,” questioning why consumers weren’t informed about the potential fertility risks associated with Bovaer.

Despite claims that the additive has been rigorously tested, the lack of transparency around its long-term health effects has sparked widespread distrust. Beyond the immediate concerns, many see Bovaer as part of a broader effort by Gates and other global elites to reshape food systems and consolidate control over agriculture.

With Gates owning more farmland in the U.S. than any other individual, his influence over what people eat—and how it’s produced—has become a flashpoint in debates about corporate overreach and public sovereignty.

The controversy over Bovaer comes amid sweeping global measures targeting agricultural emissions. Denmark recently announced a methane tax on farmers, signaling an intensifying push to regulate livestock. Critics argue that these initiatives disproportionately harm small farmers while benefiting billionaires like Gates, who stand to profit from patented solutions like Bovaer and lab-grown meat.