In a recent interview, Bill Gates complained the First Amendment is a barrier to censoring “misinformation” online.

Gates, the globalist billionaire Microsoft co-founder, is no stranger to pushing controversial agendas, but his latest comments reveal a desire to take away one of the most fundamental rights Americans hold — the right to free speech.

During an interview with CNET, Gates complained that the First Amendment, which guarantees free speech in America, is making it “tough” to censor content he considers misleading or harmful.

“The U.S. is a tough one because we have the notion of the First Amendment and what are the exceptions like yelling ‘fire’ in a theater,” Gates explained.

While warning about the growing use of deepfakes and misinformation, Gates proposed a solution that would effectively bypass the First Amendment: Digital IDs.

According to Gates, such digital identification would force people to verify their identities online, making it easier to track and censor content and punish individuals who do continue to share “misinformation.”

Gates’ proposal raises significant concerns.

Gates appears to view the protections of the First Amendment, which ensures a diversity of voices and opinions in society, as an obstacle to achieving his dystopian vision of total control of online discourse.

His suggestion to implement digital IDs is more than just a tool to combat deepfakes or misinformation — it’s a way to limit anonymity and, by extension, the freedom people have to express dissenting views without fear of reprisal from tryannical governments.

Disturbingly, Gates’ comments about speech regulation harken back to the trend among tech elites in recent years: the push to control narratives by deciding what is or isn’t “misinformation.”

The line between genuine concern for public safety and censorship is a thin one, and Gates’ idea of creating a monitored environment for online speech raises alarms about who gets to define what constitutes “misinformation” and who controls that narrative.

Clearly, the self-appointed Global Health Czar sees himself as the obvious authority on determining what qualifies as misinformation.

By citing examples like “yelling fire in a theater,” Gates downplays the broader implications of restricting free speech. The First Amendment, after all, isn’t just about protecting innocuous speech; it’s designed to protect unpopular, dissenting, and even uncomfortable views.

Gates’ vision of a future where speech is tied to verified identities online may sound appealing in the context of reducing harmful content, but it also opens the door to government or corporate surveillance and authoritarian control of public discourse.

Cast your mind back to how heavily social media was censored during the pandemic. David Mikkelson and his unqualified team of rag-tag fact checkers at Snopes essentially held the power to shadowban anybody who refused to submit to the globalist agenda.

Gates wants to make that level of control a permanent fixture.

In an era where big tech companies already hold enormous power over the flow of information, Gates’ remarks should terrify everybody.

While Gates paints his vision as a necessary step to combat the dangers of the digital age, it ultimately risks eroding the freedoms that define American society.

In the end, the greatest threat posed by Bill Gates’ comments isn’t misinformation — it’s the suggestion that freedom of speech, one of the most cherished rights in the United States, is something to be curtailed, rather than preserved, in a rapidly evolving digital world.