North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper has confirmed that entire communities affected by the storm will not be rebuilt, confirming what many are calling a government “land grab” disguised as climate change adaptation.

“We’ve spent a lot of time on the way we approach rebuilding… in some areas, you just shouldn’t build back,” Governor Cooper admitted in a recent statement. He went on to reveal that the state is actively buying out entire communities, rather than helping them rebuild their homes and lives.

“We’ve been able to convince certain communities and people that buyouts are better,” he continued, justifying the controversial strategy by citing climate change as a key reason for abandoning the communities.

The governor’s admission fuels theories of a massive land grab in North Carolina, with allegations that BlackRock stands to profit from the crisis by purchasing the land, including a globally important quartz mine, for pennies on the dollar.

While Governor Cooper frames the buyouts as a practical solution to mitigate future climate risks, North Carolina residents are furious.

The buyout program is leaving families with few choices: accept government compensation and leave their homes for good, or face a future without the support to rebuild.

The problem is compounded by the governor’s statement that “we know these events will become more and more intense.” Residents are asking: how can the government be so certain about future climate events unless they are part of a larger, hidden agenda?

The aftermath of Hurricane Helene is now seen by some as an opportunity for state authorities to enact what they’re calling a “land grab” under the guise of climate change resilience.

Many are questioning how the government can so confidently predict the increasing severity of natural disasters unless something more sinister is at play. Is this part of a larger global agenda?

Critics point to the government’s repeated use of climate change to justify policies that displace communities, warning that this is just the beginning of a broader effort to seize land for other purposes.

This move, they argue, fits into the larger narrative of “Build Back Better,” a global initiative that many see as a smokescreen for increasing government control over humanity.

The idea of a land grab isn’t just speculative. In many of the areas hardest hit by Hurricane Helene, valuable coastal land is being cleared out. These buyouts raise questions about the true purpose behind the state’s decision not to rebuild certain areas. Is this part of a larger effort to free up land for corporate interests or development projects?

The feisty folk of North Carolina are starting to push back, demanding answers from the state government about the future of their communities. For now, the official explanation is climate change, but many believe the state has ulterior motives.