Saturday, 28 December 2024

US Gov’t Funneled Billions to Walgreens and CVS to Block Ivermectin Prescriptions During Pandemic


Official US government documents reveal the federal government funneled billions of dollars to Walgreens and CVS to block them from filling Ivermectin prescriptions, while pushing experimental genetic injections knowing the shots caused serious injuries and even death.

At the height of the pandemic, Ivermectin was unjustly vilified by the U.S. government, a compromised medical establishment, and a compliant mainstream media, despite emerging research showing it could have saved the lives of millions.

Former CNN anchor Chris Cuomo, once a staunch advocate for the government’s COVID-19 narrative and a vocal critic of the unvaccinated, has now revealed he is taking Ivermectin to treat Long COVID. This condition, which affects an estimated 17 million Americans, is raising questions among many who suspect it could be caused by the COVID-19 vaccines.

Defending his use of Ivermectin in 2024, Cuomo – showing no remorse – stated, “Ivermectin was a boogeyman during COVID. That was wrong. We were given bad information about Ivermectin. The real question is, why?”

Cuomo’s flip-flop comes far too late for the millions of Americans who could have benefited from Ivermectin as part of a treatment protocol for COVID-19.

While Cuomo now acknowledges the government’s massive failures, he appears reluctant to confront his own role in spreading its falsehoods. This ties into what many consider the defining scandal of our era: the U.S. government allegedly colluding with private entities to promote experimental genetic injections—despite evidence of severe injuries and fatalities—while suppressing affordable, repurposed medications with proven safety records that could have saved countless lives.

AmericaOutLoud report: Two separate government websites reveal billions in COVID-19-related government contracts were awarded to the nation’s two largest pharmacy companies: CVS and Walgreens. Some of these government contracts appear to be ongoing today.

According to one U.S. government website, in June of 2022, CVS was the recipient of a government contract award with a potential worth of over $2.1 billion. Transaction descriptions on the website show some of the money paid to CVS was for ICATT – a CDC program providing COVID-19 testing and vaccine services.

As the CDC’s website notes, “ICATT pharmacy sites provide vaccine services, while a subset of ICATT pharmacy sites provide both testing and vaccine services.”

The $2.1 billion contract award CVS received in June of 2022 might help to explain why CVS ran a propaganda piece just a few months later, featuring then-CDC Director Rochelle Walensky visiting a CVS to receive her COVID-19 bivalent booster.

If $2.1 billion in potential government contract money is not shocking enough, a different government website shows a similar federal contract with CVS, this one having a potential worth of $3.4 billion through 2025.

Walgreens has also been on the government take. Two separate government spending websites show over $800 million in federal contract award money was awarded to Walgreen Co. in 2021:

Site 2: Federal Procurement Data System (fpds.gov)

One of these government websites also shows federal government awards to Walgreen Co. topped $1 billion in 2022.

This might help explain why Walgreens ran propaganda pieces pushing COVID-19 shots in kids at its pharmacies, and shamelessly showcased then-NIAID director Anthony Fauci receiving his COVID-19 booster at a Walgreens in October of that same year.

Both of these Walgreens propaganda pieces were attributed to Walgreens’ affiliate, Walgreens Boots Alliance, which claims a presence in eight countries through its various consumer brands and disturbingly also “has a portfolio of healthcare-focused investments located in several countries, including China and the U.S.”

Drug dealing, it seems, has always been a lucrative business, especially when the drug lord of your cartel is the federal government.

Why in the world would any supplier want to promote or prescribe a cheap and readily available drug – like Ivermectin – if doing so would throw a wrench into potential billion-dollar cash-cow contracts with the federal government?

The simple answer: If the supplier values its profits over patients, it wouldn’t.

Could this explain why doctors like Dr. Mary Tally Bowden –  despite prevailing in a lawsuit which required the FDA to remove its now infamous tweet maligning Ivermectin – still can’t get certain Walgreens stores to fill her prescriptions for Ivermectin?

As it turns out, the answer to former CNN anchor Chris Cuomo’s question, “Why were Americans given bad information about Ivermectin?” is likely to be far darker and run far deeper than most Americans want to imagine.

In light of mounting calls for accountability, the backup plan for those who pushed the government’s lethal narrative may now be – like Cuomo – to admit mistakes were made and play dumb while trying to frame the human carnage as limited (as the New York Times recently attempted to do).


Source link