Leading scientists, including MIT’s Richard Lindzen and Princeton’s William Happer, have debunked the global warming myth, revealing that rising CO2 levels do not cause dangerous climate change but instead feed the planet by boosting food production. Their groundbreaking research challenges decades of fearmongering, exposing the misuse of climate science to push restrictive policies, while highlighting CO2’s role in greening the Earth and combating starvation.

For years, politicians, corporate elites, and mainstream media have promoted a “climate crisis” narrative to justify draconian regulations, wealth redistribution, and the dismantling of modern energy systems. Lindzen and Happer’s irrefutable physics-based findings dismantle these claims, showing that CO2 increases do not drive extreme weather or catastrophic warming but significantly enhance global agriculture, fostering a more resilient and food-secure world.

Naturalnews.com reports: The IPCC insists that rising temperatures cause more evaporation, leading to increased water vapor — a greenhouse gas — which then traps even more heat in a runaway “positive feedback loop.” But real-world observations show the opposite: more evaporation leads to more clouds, which reflect sunlight back into space and cool the planet. Satellite data confirms that cloud cover acts as Earth’s natural thermostat, offsetting warming rather than amplifying it. The IPCC’s models exaggerate warming by assuming feedbacks are always positive, ignoring nature’s balancing mechanisms. This isn’t just bad science — it’s a deliberate misrepresentation to justify climate alarmism.

CO? levels: Far from “record highs”

The IPCC claims today’s CO? levels (around 420 ppm) are dangerously high, but Earth’s history tells a different story. Over the last 600 million years, CO? has averaged thousands of parts per million — far higher than today. During the Cambrian Period (7,000 ppm), temperatures were colder than now, proving CO? doesn’t dictate climate. Even in the Medieval Warm Period (300 ppm), Greenland was farm-able—today, it’s frozen. Alarmists ignore geology to push a false narrative. Worse, at 150 ppm, plants (and humans) face extinction. CO? isn’t a pollutant—it’s essential for life, and we’re still near historic lows.

The CO? saturation effect: Diminishing returns on warming

Basic physics shows CO?’s warming effect weakens as concentrations rise. Like adding ink to black water, each new molecule traps less heat. By 420 ppm, CO? is near saturation — additional emissions have minimal impact. Even the IPCC’s MAGICC model admits that slashing U.S. emissions to “Net Zero” would cool Earth by just 0.02°F by 2100 — a meaningless change. Alarmists cherry-pick the last 150 years, but geologic records reveal CO? and temperature often move opposite of IPCC predictions. If CO? drove warming, why were past eras with thousands of ppm cooler than today? The truth: CO?’s role is exaggerated to justify political control.

CO? is life — Starving the poor is the real crisis

While elites lecture us on emissions, their policies devastate the poor. CO? boosts crop yields — wheat grows 28% faster, rice 70% — yet “Net Zero” threatens global food supplies. Sri Lanka’s 2021 organic farming mandate (to cut emissions) halved rice production, causing famine. Meanwhile, 2.1 billion still burn dung and kerosene for survival — fossil fuels could lift them from poverty. Climate policies aren’t about saving the planet; they’re about denying energy to the developing world. The real crisis isn’t CO? — it’s the artificial scarcity imposed by wealthy hypocrites flying private jets to climate summits.

The IPCC: A political operation, not science

The IPCC isn’t neutral — it’s a tool for governments to push pre-approved narratives. In 1995, scientists originally wrote: “No study attributes warming to manmade causes.” Politicians deleted that line and replaced it with: “Human influence on climate is discernible.” This fraud continues today, with reports rewritten to fit alarmist agendas. Real science is ignored — like MIT’s Richard Lindzen showing CO?’s impact is overstated. The IPCC exists to justify control, not truth.