Ariel
@Prolotario1

“Unveiling the Deep State’s Panic: Why 34 Nations’ Trade Talks with Trump Threaten Their Global Dominion”

Deep State Fears Regarding the Meeting of 34 Countries with Donald Trump

Disruption of Global Economic Control

The Deep State’s influence thrives on a tightly controlled global economic system, where institutions like the International Monetary Fund (IMF), World Bank, and central banks dictate terms that favor entrenched elites. The meeting of 34 countries with Donald Trump signals a potential rebellion against this order. Trump’s push for a “New Deal” emphasizing fair trade, currency parity, and equal value threatens to dismantle the mechanisms such as currency manipulation, unfair trade agreements, and value-added taxes (VATs) that allow certain nations and corporations to maintain economic dominance. By negotiating directly with these countries, Trump could bypass globalist institutions, weakening the Deep State’s ability to enforce compliance through economic leverage. For instance, reciprocal tariffs, as outlined in Trump’s Fair and Reciprocal Plan, could force nations to lower barriers, reducing the profits of multinational corporations aligned with Deep State interests. This shift risks exposing the fragility of their economic control, as nations prioritize sovereignty over globalist agendas.

Threat to Dollar Hegemony

The U.S. dollar’s status as the world’s reserve currency is a cornerstone of Deep State power, enabling the United States to sustain massive trade deficits while maintaining global financial dominance. Trump’s discussions with 34 countries about currency parity and monetary revaluation directly challenge this. By advocating for a system where currencies reflect equal value, Trump could weaken the dollar’s artificial strength, which has subsidized American consumption but hollowed out its industrial base. This aligns with sentiments from advisors like Stephen Miran, who critique the dollar’s reserve status as a burden on American producers. A devalued or less dominant dollar would reduce the Deep State’s ability to wield financial influence, as foreign nations might diversify away from dollar-denominated assets, shrinking the capital account surplus that funds U.S. debt. The fear is that this could trigger a cascade, where countries like China or India push for alternative reserve systems, eroding the Deep State’s geopolitical leverage.

Exposure of Intelligence Agency Collusion

Intelligence agencies, deeply embedded in the Deep State, rely on covert operations to maintain global influence, often through economic coercion or destabilization. The meeting of 34 countries, many of which are key U.S. trading partners, raises concerns that Trump’s negotiations could expose or disrupt these operations. For example, fair trade agreements might force transparency in areas like subsidies or currency manipulation, which agencies like the CIA have historically used to manipulate foreign economies. Countries like Vietnam or India, currently in talks with Trump, might reveal past instances of economic sabotage or espionage as bargaining chips, implicating agency involvement. The Deep State fears that Trump’s unorthodox diplomacy described as a “daunting sprint of talks” with over 70 countries could unravel decades of clandestine agreements, especially if nations share documentation or witnesses to secure better trade terms. This could lead to public disclosures that undermine the agencies’ untouchable status.

Undermining Secret Society Networks

Secret societies, often linked to the Deep State, operate through hidden networks that influence global policy and trade. These groups thrive in opaque systems where unfair trade practices, such as non-tariff barriers or VATs, create opportunities for elite profiteering. Trump’s push for transparency and reciprocity in trade, as seen in his April 2, 2025, tariff announcements, threatens to shine a light on these networks. By forcing countries to negotiate openly, Trump could inadvertently expose shell companies, offshore accounts, or lobbying efforts tied to these societies. For instance, the involvement of 15 major economies, including Japan and South Korea, in tariff talks suggests a broad coalition that might share intelligence on illicit financial flows to secure exemptions. The Deep State fears that such disclosures could dismantle their carefully curated influence, as public scrutiny grows and nations prioritize national interests over elite agendas.

Risk of Decentralized Power Structures

The Deep State’s power is centralized through globalist frameworks like the World Trade Organization (WTO) and Bretton Woods institutions, which enforce rules benefiting a select few. Trump’s meeting with 34 countries, representing a significant portion of global GDP, suggests a move toward decentralized trade agreements that prioritize bilateral or regional deals. This shift, as hinted by advisors like Robert Lighthizer, could fragment the global economy, making it harder for the Deep State to dictate terms. Countries like China, facing a 34% tariff, or the EU, hit with 20%, might form alternative trade blocs, as speculated by former diplomat Wendy Cutler, who noted potential EU interest in the CPTPP. Such realignments would dilute the Deep State’s ability to control global markets, as nations bypass centralized systems. The fear is that this decentralization could inspire broader sovereignty movements, challenging the Deep State’s top-down authority.

Potential for Public Awakening

The Deep State operates in secrecy, relying on public ignorance to maintain its grip. Trump’s high-profile trade negotiations, coupled with his rhetoric about “cheating” nations and “Liberation Day,” risk galvanizing public attention. By framing trade imbalances as a national emergency, as he did on April 2, 2025, Trump could awaken citizens to the inequities of global trade, such as the $200 billion in VATs paid by U.S. companies annually. This awareness might extend to deeper issues, like the role of intelligence agencies or secret societies in perpetuating these imbalances. The Deep State fears that an informed populace, especially in the 34 countries involved, could demand accountability, leading to investigations or leaks that expose their machinations. Social media platforms like X, where posts celebrate Trump’s trade moves, amplify this risk, as public sentiment could spiral beyond their control.

Destabilization of Geopolitical Alliances

The Deep State relies on stable geopolitical alliances, often enforced through economic dependency, to maintain global order. Trump’s aggressive tariff strategy, including 10% baseline tariffs and higher rates on countries like Vietnam (46%) and Taiwan (32%), threatens to fracture these alliances. Nations like South Korea, negotiating item-by-item deals, or Japan, sending top teams, may prioritize economic survival over loyalty to U.S.-led frameworks. This could weaken NATO, the G7, or other Deep State-aligned coalitions, as countries seek new partners like China or India. The Deep State fears that this realignment, coupled with Trump’s willingness to escalate tensions (e.g., threatening 50% tariffs on China), could lead to a multipolar world where their influence is diluted. The chaotic negotiations, with over 50 countries reaching out, signal a potential collapse of the unipolar order they’ve long dominated.

Erosion of Financial Manipulation Mechanisms

The Deep State’s financial dominance hinges on complex mechanisms like derivatives markets, offshore banking, and debt-based control, which allow elites to siphon wealth while maintaining economic instability. Trump’s emphasis on monetary revaluation and equal value threatens to disrupt these tools by stabilizing national economies and reducing reliance on debt-driven systems. For example, countries like Brazil or Mexico, part of the 34-nation talks, might push for trade terms that limit speculative capital flows, exposing the role of institutions like Goldman Sachs or JPMorgan in market manipulation. The Deep State fears that transparent trade agreements could reveal the extent of their financial engineering, as nations demand audits or repatriate assets. This could lead to a domino effect, where public and governmental scrutiny dismantles the opaque financial networks that sustain their power.

Weakening of Propaganda and Media Control

The Deep State’s ability to shape narratives relies on compliant media and propaganda networks that suppress dissent and obscure economic truths. Trump’s trade talks, framed as a fight against “globalist exploitation,” challenge this control by providing a platform for alternative narratives. The involvement of 34 countries, many with domestic media outlets critical of Western dominance, risks amplifying anti-Deep State sentiments. For instance, nations like India or South Africa could leak details of unfair trade practices, fueling global distrust in mainstream media. The Deep State fears that Trump’s direct communication style, often via platforms like X, could inspire other leaders to bypass traditional media, eroding their monopoly on information. This loss of narrative control could spark grassroots movements, demanding accountability for decades of economic and political manipulation.

Threat to Long-Term Population Control Agendas

The Deep State’s alleged long-term agendas, including population control through economic dependency and resource allocation, face significant risks from Trump’s trade reforms. By promoting fair trade and currency parity, Trump could empower developing nations among the 34, like Nigeria or Indonesia, to achieve economic self-sufficiency, reducing their vulnerability to external pressures. This shift threatens programs tied to global health, food security, or climate initiatives, which critics argue serve as covert population control mechanisms. The Deep State fears that economically empowered nations might reject these frameworks, exposing their ulterior motives. For example, trade deals prioritizing local production could undermine multinational agribusiness or pharmaceutical dominance, revealing the extent of their influence over global supply chains and sparking resistance to centralized control.

Collapse of Technological Monopolies

The Deep State’s grip on global power is bolstered by technological monopolies, particularly in industries like semiconductors, AI, and telecommunications, controlled by a handful of corporations aligned with their interests. Trump’s trade negotiations, especially with tech-heavy economies like Taiwan, South Korea, and Japan, could disrupt these monopolies by encouraging technology transfers or localized production. For instance, tariffs on Taiwan (32%) might push it to share semiconductor expertise with allies to secure exemptions, diluting the dominance of firms like TSMC, which are tied to Deep State financial networks. The fear is that such moves could democratize access to critical technologies, weakening the leverage of tech giants and their backers. This could also expose covert surveillance programs embedded in global tech supply chains, as nations audit their dependencies.

Disruption of Energy Market Manipulation

Energy markets, long manipulated by Deep State-aligned cartels and financial institutions, are another pillar of their control, with oil and gas prices often used to destabilize or coerce nations. Trump’s trade talks, particularly with energy exporters like Canada or Saudi Arabia (if involved), threaten to stabilize energy markets through bilateral agreements that prioritize fair pricing and local production. His past emphasis on U.S. energy independence, coupled with tariff pressures, could force OPEC or other producers to abandon price-fixing schemes, exposing their collusion with Western banks. The Deep State fears that transparent energy deals could reveal decades of market rigging, as countries share data on hidden reserves or manipulated futures contracts. This risks unraveling the economic stranglehold that energy volatility provides.

Undermining Climate and Sustainability Agendas

The Deep State leverages climate and sustainability agendas to impose restrictive policies that maintain economic dependency and control over developing nations. Trump’s trade negotiations, which prioritize economic sovereignty, could unravel these agendas by empowering countries like Brazil or Indonesia to reject carbon credit schemes or green regulations that favor Western corporations. For example, fair trade terms might allow these nations to exploit their natural resources without punitive tariffs, exposing the hypocrisy of climate frameworks that enrich elites while stifling growth. The Deep State fears that such defiance could lead to a broader rejection of globalist environmental policies, revealing their role as tools for economic subjugation rather than ecological salvation.

Risk of Exposing Historical Covert Operations

The Deep State’s historical covert operations, including regime changes and economic sabotage, rely on secrecy to avoid accountability. Trump’s negotiations with 34 countries, many of which have been targets of such operations, risk surfacing evidence of past interventions. Nations like Mexico or South Africa, seeking favorable trade terms, might disclose declassified documents or witness accounts of CIA-orchestrated coups or market manipulations to gain leverage. The Deep State fears that these revelations, amplified by Trump’s public platform, could spark international outrage and demands for reparations, undermining their moral and political authority. The sheer scale of the talks, involving diverse nations with historical grievances, increases the likelihood of such exposures, threatening to rewrite the narrative of global history.

Fracturing of Global Pharmaceutical Dominance

The Deep State’s influence extends to the pharmaceutical industry, where global health policies and drug distribution networks are used to maintain control over populations and economies. Trump’s trade negotiations, particularly with countries like India, a major producer of generic drugs, could disrupt this dominance by promoting fair trade terms that prioritize affordable medicine over patented monopolies. For instance, tariff exemptions might encourage India to flood markets with low-cost generics, undermining the profits of Big Pharma giants tied to Deep State interests. The fear is that such moves could expose price-fixing schemes or coercive vaccine mandates, as nations share data on inflated costs or suppressed treatments. This risks dismantling the pharmaceutical cartel’s grip, sparking public backlash against their role in global health manipulation.

Source(s):
https://www.patreon.com/Prolotario1

______________________________________________________

Contact Author

If you wish to contact the author of this article. Please email us at [This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.] and we’ll forward your email to the author.
______________________________________________________

Guest Posting

If you wish to write and/or publish an article on Operation Disclosure all you need to do is send your entry to [This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.] applying these following rules.

The subject of your email entry should be: “Entry Post | (Title of your post) | Operation Disclosure”

– Must be in text format
– Proper Grammar
– No foul language
– Your signature/name/username at the top
______________________________________________________

Newsletter

If you wish to receive the daily Operation Disclosure Newsletter, you can subscribe via the PayPal “Subscribe” button located at the bottom.
______________________________________________________

Our mission at Operation Disclosure is to get you up-to-date on the latest conspiracies and geopolitics. We also aim to provide raw unvetted information about world events from various sources and user submitted research on topics such as exopolitics, extraterrestrial and UFO/UAP sightings, secret space programs, and the lost or ancient origins and history of humanity.

Disclaimer: All articles, videos, and images posted on Operation Disclosure were submitted by readers and/or handpicked by the site itself for informational and/or entertainment purposes. All statements, claims, views, and opinions that appear on this site are always presented as unverified and should be discerned by the reader. We do not endorse any opinions expressed on this website and we do not support, represent or guarantee the completeness, truthfulness, accuracy, or reliability of any content posted on this website.

Copyright © Operation Disclosure