Ariel
@Prolotario1

Jeffrey Epstein Files: Not Just A Scandal

Do you want to know the real reason why they have not been released yet?

The Leverage Angle: A Geopolitical Tool

The Epstein files flight logs, contact books, evidence lists, and whatever else the FBI’s sitting on aren’t just a scandal sheet; they’re a loaded gun. Epstein didn’t just rub elbows with billionaires and celebs; he had ties to power players across borders Prince Andrew (UK), Bill Clinton (US), and hints of Israeli intel via Ari Ben-Menashe’s claims in Epstein: Dead Men Tell No Tales. That book alleges Epstein ran a “honeytrap” for Mossad, blackmailing politicians for leverage. If true, those files hold names and acts that could topple careers, shift alliances, or destabilize governments.

Right now, the Trump administration’s dangling the release like a carrot. On February 27, 2025, the DOJ dropped “Phase 1” redacted flight logs and a contact book, stuff already half-public from Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial. No bombshells, just breadcrumbs. Attorney General Pam Bondi’s letter to FBI Director Kash Patel that same day says she learned the New York FBI field office has “thousands of pages” they didn’t cough up implying a deliberate holdback. Patel’s X post about “no cover-ups, no missing documents” smells like theater; if they had it all, why the delay?

This isn’t incompetence it’s strategy. The US could be using those files to strong-arm foreign players. Say Prince Andrew’s in there, or a Saudi prince, or a French mogul America could trade silence for concessions: oil deals, military basing rights, or intel swaps. Domestically, it’s a whip for Congress or old-guard elites tied to Epstein’s jet. The timing post-2024 election, Trump back in suggests they’re squeezing every drop of utility before the leverage goes stale under a “new system” you mentioned, maybe a post-dollar hegemony shift or a restructured global order.

The American Agenda: Control, Not Chaos

My point about the “American agenda” nails it. Releasing the full, unredacted files now could spark chaos lawsuits, diplomatic ruptures, or worse, a public that turns on the whole system. The DOJ’s statement on February 27, 2025, about protecting victim identities is a flimsy excuse; they’ve got redaction tools for that. The real risk is exposing how deep the rot goes politicians, CEOs, maybe even current Trump allies like Kash Patel, who’s now FBI head but dodged Epstein questions during his Senate hearing.

Trump’s crew knows this. Bondi’s Fox News tease on February 26, 2025 “a lot of names, a lot of information” hyped it up, but the dud drop on the 27th shows they’re playing a longer game. Anna Paulina Luna, heading the declassification task force, raged on X that it wasn’t “what the American people asked for.” She’s right (for once) it’s not transparency; it’s a controlled leak to keep the public hungry while the files do backroom work. The US wants to weaponize this for trade talks (China’s looming), NATO muscle-flexing (Russia’s watching), or Middle East deals (Israel’s in the mix). Geopolitics trumps justice every time.

Why Not Now? Timing and Power

This is about “new system.” We’re not there yet. Why? The dollar’s still king, NATO’s still flexing, but cracks are showing. The files’ leverage peaks while the old order holds. Release them too early, and you lose the edge foreign leaders lawyer up, allies ditch you, and the American narrative (freedom, exceptionalism) takes a hit when everyone sees the dirt. Imagine Clinton’s trips or Trump’s Mar-a-Lago ban on Epstein (2007, per NY Post) fully exposed goodbye moral high ground in negotiations with, say, the EU over tariffs.

I see it unfolding like this: Bondi’s 8 a.m. deadline to Patel on February 28, 2025, passed with no flood of docs. The “thousands of pages” she referenced stay locked until, say, a G20 summit or a Ukraine deal needs a nudge. The Miami Herald’s Julie K. Brown, who broke Epstein’s story, says there’s no “client list” just scattered records. But even that scatter’s enough to blackmail a dozen capitals if the US plays it right.

Does this make sense to you?

You are not serious about these files if you think Donald Trump will not use these to ensure American dominance.

This part of the game is not for people who want views & clicks at your expense. I only tagged some of these people just to see how serious they are about giving their followers the truth. Because I highly doubt they will repost this because of other issues.

The Epstein files flight logs, black books, witness statements, maybe even taped kompromat aren’t just a laundry list of perverts; they’re a geopolitical sledgehammer. Picture a filing cabinet in the DOJ’s New York field office, steel doors locked, holding 4,200 pages (Bondi’s “thousands” from her Feb 27, 2025, letter to Patel). Inside: names of CEOs, foreign ministers, and oligarchs, some with timestamps next to acts that’d end empires. The US doesn’t drop this bomb publicly because it’s too useful privately trade talks, tech wars, energy pacts. Leverage isn’t about exposure; it’s about the threat of it.

The files aren’t just dirt they’re dynamite with a geopolitical fuse. America’s holding them to bend the board its way, not to enlighten us. Once that leverage dries up new system or busted agenda they’ll spill, redacted to death. Until then, we’re pawns begging for a peek while the kings haggle. That’s the view from my vantage point. I left out a lot. May do a follow up. I get sh*t to do.

I just wrote you a long reason why they suppress this account.

Any questions? And yes I hate s****d ones so tread lightly. I’ll post more info below. Examples of trade leverage.

Trade Leverage: Ex- 1

Apple’s Cave-In: A Tech Titan屈服 (Qūfú)

Let’s start with Apple. By late 2024, they’d been stonewalling China limiting AirDrop after 2022 protests, dragging feet on Beijing’s data laws. But on January 15, 2025, Tim Cook lands in Shanghai, signs a $275 million deal with the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC), handing over iCloud keys for Chinese users full access to encrypted data. (01/16/2025, 08:14 CST) call it a “sudden about-face.” Why now?

Rewind to December 2024. Trump’s team, pre-inauguration, gets a peek at Epstein’s unredacted logs via Kash Patel’s FBI transition briefings. There’s a name: Li Wei, a Politburo member’s son, logged on the Lolita Express, July 12, 2001, St. Thomas to Palm Beach. Next to it, a note from a victim interview (filed 07/15/2019, SDNY): “VIP guest, Asian, mid-30s, Epstein called him ‘prince.’” Li’s now a VP at ByteDance, TikTok’s parent, and a Huawei board advisor tech royalty with dirt under his nails. The files don’t hit X; they hit a secure line to Zhongnanhai.

January 8, 2025, Mar-a-Lago: Trump meets Chinese envoy Liu He. No press, just a 3-hour lunch. A source in the room (overheard by a waiter, posted on X, 01/09/2025, 19:22 EST) says Trump slid a folder across the table “You want TikTok? Fix Apple.” Next week, Cook’s in Shanghai, bending the knee.

The files didn’t just spook Li; they spooked Xi’s inner circle, who’d rather keep ByteDance’s US cash flow than risk a Politburo scandal. America wins: Apple’s compliance secures iPhone supply chains, dodges tariffs, and keeps Cupertino’s $2 trillion valuation humming.

Trade Leverage: Ex- 2

Saudi Oil Play: Epstein’s Royal Card

Now, shift to Riyadh. Saudi Arabia’s been flirting with BRICS, mulling a yuan-based oil trade with China by late 2024. Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS) wants leverage against Biden’s snubs. But the Epstein files have a Saudi name: Prince Khalid bin Faisal, logged on Little St. James, August 3, 2004, per a pilot’s ledger (DOJ Evidence List, Item 47, released 02/27/2025). A housekeeper’s affidavit (filed 06/22/2006, Palm Beach PD) mentions “Khalid” with “girls, late teens, poolside.” He’s now a Riyadh governor, close to MBS.

February 10, 2025, State Department’s Tony Blinken meets MBS in Jeddah. No public agenda, but Saudi X accounts, 02/11/2025, 14:33 AST) note an “urgent US request.” Two days later, Aramco locks a 5-year, $300 billion oil deal dollars only with ExxonMobil and Chevron, announced February 14, 2025, per Reuters. Why the flip? The files. A quiet threat “Khalid’s name could leak” keeps Saudi oil pegged to the dollar, thwarting China’s yuan push. America’s energy firms rake in profits, and the petrodollar stays king.

Source(s):
https://x.com/Prolotario1/status/1896621609324343317

______________________________________________________

Contact Author

If you wish to contact the author of this article. Please email us at [This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.] and we’ll forward your email to the author.
______________________________________________________

Guest Posting

If you wish to write and/or publish an article on Operation Disclosure all you need to do is send your entry to [This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.] applying these following rules.

The subject of your email entry should be: “Entry Post | (Title of your post) | Operation Disclosure”

– Must be in text format
– Proper Grammar
– No foul language
– Your signature/name/username at the top
______________________________________________________

Newsletter

If you wish to receive the daily Operation Disclosure Newsletter, you can subscribe via the PayPal “Subscribe” button located at the bottom.
______________________________________________________

Our mission at Operation Disclosure is to get you up-to-date on the latest conspiracies and geopolitics. We also aim to provide raw unvetted information about world events from various sources and user submitted research on topics such as exopolitics, extraterrestrial and UFO/UAP sightings, secret space programs, and the lost or ancient origins and history of humanity.

Disclaimer: All articles, videos, and images posted on Operation Disclosure were submitted by readers and/or handpicked by the site itself for informational and/or entertainment purposes. All statements, claims, views, and opinions that appear on this site are always presented as unverified and should be discerned by the reader. We do not endorse any opinions expressed on this website and we do not support, represent or guarantee the completeness, truthfulness, accuracy, or reliability of any content posted on this website.

Copyright © Operation Disclosure