Saturday, 19 April 2025

Bannon’s Imprisonment Violates Law—Why He Should Be Released Immediately

Steve Bannon's War Room
Hits: 62

Peter Navarro has fiercely argued that Steve Bannon should be released from prison immediately, emphasizing that keeping Bannon behind bars would be a direct violation of federal laws designed to ensure fair treatment of prisoners. Navarro’s arguments are rooted in both legal precedent and statutory provisions that he believes have been ignored or misapplied in Bannon’s case.

Navarro stated, "Judge Walker’s dissent shows there were significant legal issues with sending Bannon to prison immediately. It’s not just a technicality; it’s a matter of substantial legal importance.”

In Friday’s WarRoom program, Navarro detailed the disparity in judicial treatment between Bannon and himself. He highlighted that when both were sentenced, Bannon’s judge, Nichols, initially allowed him to remain free pending appeal, a standard practice in many cases.

However, following Bannon’s appeal denial, Judge Nichols reversed his decision, sending Bannon to Danbury prison at the government’s behest despite ongoing appeals.

Navarro argues that this decision ignored Judge Walker’s dissenting opinion, which indicated substantial legal issues in the case.

Navarro also criticized the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) for not adhering to the First Step and Second Chance Act, which he argues entitles Bannon to an earlier release or home confinement.

"Under the First Step Act and the Second Chance Act, Bannon should have been released to home confinement 42 days before his scheduled release,” Navarro asserted, adding:

"The BOP’s failure to comply with these statutes amounts to a clear violation of congressional law.”

The First Step Act and the Second Chance Act provide reductions in sentences for good behavior and rehabilitation, designed to ease inmates’ transition back into society. Navarro believes that Bannon’s continued imprisonment, despite these legal provisions, is unjust and illegal.

He stated, "I served my full term despite being eligible for early release under these laws. Bannon should not face the same fate, especially given his critical role in the 2024 election.”

Furthermore, Navarro criticized the media for its lack of coverage on this crucial issue, accusing reporters of being "lazy and stupid” in their legal reporting. He argued that they failed to recognize the significance of Judge Walker’s dissent and the implications for Bannon’s case.

"The media’s failure to adequately cover this story is a disservice to the public,” Navarro said. "They’re missing the bigger picture of how Bannon’s continued imprisonment represents a breakdown in the application of important laws.”

Navarro’s call for Bannon’s release is based on the belief that the BOP’s actions not only breach statutory requirements but also undermine the fairness of the legal process.

He concluded, "If the BOP does not correct this injustice, it will be breaking the law for the second time, just as it did in my case. Bannon deserves to be free to contribute to the 2024 election, and it’s time for the legal system to uphold its own rules and principles.”

Navarro shows that the media is ignoring a critical legal and ethical debate about Bannon’s imprisonment that deals with both the legal avenues for his release and the broader implications of ignoring statutory protections for inmates.

Jeff Clark posted the legal filings from Bannon’s team to move for his release:

If you want to make a difference call Congress and remind them of their own law:

For more context, watch this entire segment:

Dr. Navarro: “Bureau of Prisons Will Break The Law If They Do Not Allow Steve To Go To Home Confinement 42 Days Earlier Than His Release Date”

 


Source link

Search