FULL WEIGHT OF WHITE HOUSE: Karoline Leavitt Addresses Press On Judge Blocking Federal Firings

Steve Bannon broke away to acknowledge White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt’s update, emphasizing President Trump’s push for a New England pipeline and his administration’s battle against judicial overreach. Leavitt criticized activist judges for issuing an unprecedented number of injunctions against Trump’s executive authority, far surpassing those under Biden. She asserted that these legal challenges were politically motivated attempts to undermine Trump’s presidency.

Bannon echoed this sentiment, predicting a prolonged battle against judicial activism, highlighting the radicalization of the courts. He referenced past Democratic efforts to push through judicial appointments before losing Senate control, which he argues contributed to today’s legal fights. He stressed that Trump’s legal team would aggressively counter these attacks, pointing to Trump’s resilience despite multiple indictments.

Bannon also warned about activist-driven efforts to disrupt conservative policies, urging MAGA supporters to attend town halls and defend Trump’s agenda. He underscored the need for significant budget cuts, arguing that continued government spending was unsustainable. He previewed upcoming legal discussions featuring experts like John Yoo and Julie Kelly, reinforcing that the courts remain a crucial battleground. Bannon maintained that Trump’s policies are under siege, but his supporters must stay engaged in the fight.

BANNON: "President Trump Is Trying To Stop The Sins Of The ‘Cure For Watergate’”

Steve Bannon and Matt Boyle discussed Boyle’s recent interview with the Treasury Secretary, focusing on economic policy under a potential second Trump administration. The conversation centered on the need to “reprivatize” the American economy, reversing Biden-era government spending and returning to a private sector-driven growth model.

The Treasury Secretary emphasized the dangers of excessive government spending, arguing that it created economic dependency and embedded inflation in the system. To empower Main Street businesses, he detailed a strategy to cut spending, lower interest rates, and deregulate the banking system, especially for small and regional banks.

Bannon and Boyle noted that critics claim such reforms could trigger a recession. The Treasury Secretary disagreed, arguing that a carefully managed transition would prevent economic turmoil and create sustainable growth. He criticized the mainstream media for previously ignoring Biden’s deficit spending, which he said had destabilized the economy.

Bannon connected this economic overhaul to broader Trump policies, including national security, military restructuring, and border control. He highlighted Trump’s efforts to regain control over strategic assets like the Panama Canal and explore military options against cartels. He also mentioned upcoming executive orders, including invoking the 1798 Alien Act to expedite deportations.

The conversation underscored Trump’s intention to reshape the U.S. government fundamentally, cut bureaucracy, and curb the influence of the “war machine.” Bannon emphasized that Trump’s policies were bold and transformative, aimed at breaking the establishment’s grip on power and restoring economic independence.

These Activist Judges Are Trying To Tell The President Of The United States He Does Not Have Power

Steve Bannon and Mike Davis discussed the ongoing judicial resistance to President Trump’s efforts to streamline the executive branch by cutting waste and firing federal employees deemed unnecessary. Davis argued that activist judges are illegally blocking Trump’s constitutional authority to hire and fire personnel, issuing nationwide injunctions that overstep their legal bounds. Bannon emphasized that Democrats are using the courts as their last line of defense, bypassing Congress because they cannot win legislatively. Davis warned that radical judges are sabotaging the presidency, undermining judicial legitimacy, and provoking a political backlash. He called for the Supreme Court, particularly Chief Justice Roberts, to rein in lower courts. Both stressed that Trump’s fight against the administrative state is crucial for preserving America’s constitutional order. They urged the president’s legal team to push forward, arguing that judicial interference in executive decisions is unconstitutional and a direct challenge to presidential authority under Article II.

RICKARDS: Tariffs Are NOT A Sales Tax On The American People

Steve Bannon and Jim Rickards discussed the economic and constitutional foundations of tariffs and executive power under President Trump. Rickards argued that tariffs have historically driven American economic growth from Alexander Hamilton’s era until the 1960s and are not merely a tax on consumers, as critics claim. He emphasized that tariffs incentivize domestic investment and job creation, countering globalization’s economic drain.

Bannon then pivoted to the broader constitutional struggle, featuring legal scholar John Yoo. They examined how Watergate-era reforms weakened presidential authority, particularly over the Department of Justice and the FBI. Yoo argued that Trump’s governance aims to restore the original constitutional vision of a unitary executive, where the president exercises full control over law enforcement. The left’s portrayal of Trump as authoritarian, they contended, is a reaction to his dismantling of the post-Watergate administrative state. The discussion framed Trump’s presidency as a constitutional correction against bureaucratic overreach.

Part One:

"Are Independent Agencies Even Constitutional?” Jim Rickards On Lawfare 2.0

Part Two:

END THE SINS OF WATERGATE REFORMS: John Yoo Explains How Executive Branch Power Is Under Attack

Steve Bannon and John Yoo discussed the constitutional role of the presidency, focusing on Donald Trump’s efforts to restore executive authority. Yoo, a legal scholar and former Justice Department official, explained that post-Watergate reforms weakened presidential power by creating independent agencies and insulating officials from presidential oversight. Bannon emphasized that Trump’s actions, such as budget control, law enforcement oversight, and administrative restructuring, aim to dismantle this “Post-Constitutional administrative state” and restore the original constitutional vision of a unitary executive.

Yoo argued that the Founders intended for the president to have full authority over the executive branch, ensuring accountability and swift governance. They noted that progressive-era reforms diluted presidential power, favoring technocratic bureaucracies over democratic accountability. Bannon and Yoo highlighted Trump’s legal battles against judicial overreach and suggested that Supreme Court rulings could reaffirm executive control. The conversation framed Trump’s efforts as a constitutional correction rather than an authoritarian overreach.

Joe Pags: "They Want The Police To Shoot You”

Steve Bannon and Joe Pags discussed a recent swatting attack targeting Pags, a coordinated and dangerous tactic meant to provoke a deadly police response. Pags recounted the terrifying incident, which occurred around 2:30 AM. Noticing an armed individual outside, he quickly assessed the situation, armed himself, and called 911. Authorities informed him that they received a false report about a violent incident at his home, a clear attempt to incite a lethal confrontation.

Bannon emphasized the grave nature of swatting, citing similar incidents involving public figures like Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene. He argued that these attacks are not mere pranks but deliberate assassination attempts aimed at silencing voices critical of the establishment. Pags agreed, stressing that this was an orchestrated effort to remove prominent conservative voices from public discourse.

They highlighted the need for law enforcement awareness, urging media figures to educate local police and establish protocols to prevent deadly misunderstandings. Pags credited his security cameras and swift thinking for de-escalating the situation, warning others in the media to take precautions. The conversation underscored the broader dangers of political intimidation and the necessity of preparedness against such threats.

Shawn Farash: "We Want Them To Be Brought To Justice”

Steve Bannon and Shawn Farash discussed the escalating political warfare against President Donald Trump and his allies, emphasizing the urgency of constitutional restoration. Bannon highlighted the dangers of “swatting” and other tactics aimed at silencing key figures, warning that attacks on the movement’s leaders would extend to everyday Americans. He pointed to Trump’s decisive leadership, contrasting it with decades of empty talk about dismantling bureaucratic overreach, including abolishing the Department of Education and reforming the Justice Department. The discussion underscored the left’s increasing aggression, describing them as “vicious” and desperate to maintain control. Bannon referenced Alex Jones and General Flynn, echoing the belief that commitment to the cause requires readiness for personal sacrifice, including imprisonment or worse. He framed Trump as fully committed to this fight, backed by robust security measures. The conversation closed with a rallying cry for populist-nationalist action, reinforcing the movement’s unwavering resistance.