PEACE THROUGH STRENGTH: President Trump Speaks At NATO Summit

President Trump, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio spoke to the press at the NATO Summit on a variety of issues, including attacks on Iran and intelligence reports in the aftermath of Saturday’s bombing.

Pt.1:

President Trump Takes Questions At NATO Summit

Pt.2:

CONTROL IN HOSTILE TERRITORY: Trump Shuts Down Fake News At NATO Summit, Kassam Reacts

Raheem Kassam reacts to President Trump at NATO.

Pt.1

Raheem Kassam: "New York City Took One Giant Leap Towards Sharia Law Yesterday”

Pt.2:

Sam Faddis: "Israel Ran The Game, And We Walked Right Into It Because Our Intel Failed”

Steve Bannon and Sam Faddis raised serious concerns about Netanyahu’s role in escalating the Iran conflict, suggesting Israel may have manipulated U.S. intelligence and pressured Trump into strikes without full context. They criticized the lack of U.S.-generated intel and warned against overreliance on foreign sources. Bannon emphasized there’s no regime change plan or ground troops—Trump’s strike was limited and final. They pointed to a Washington Post report suggesting Netanyahu planned this war a year ago, and stressed the need for an independent intelligence team to inform the president. Faddis warned: "We got played.” Bannon added, "The MAGA movement says: take the win.”

(RET.) COL. DEREK HARVEY: "The U.S. Is Too Reliant On Foreign Allies Like Israel For Intel”

Steve Bannon and Col. Derek Harvey discussed the 12-day war between Israel and Iran, with Bannon declaring the conflict over following U.S. airstrikes and President Trump’s firm stance: "It’s done.” Harvey emphasized that while Israel has strong defense systems like Iron Dome and Arrow, they were overwhelmed by Iranian ballistic missile attacks—requiring critical U.S. support, including Aegis cruisers and Air Force intervention. Harvey argued Israel may have acted prematurely, possibly biting off more than it could handle. He questioned the urgency of the strikes, implying regime change—not nuclear threats—was the real objective. Both men warned against U.S. overreliance on Israeli intelligence and called for a "Team B” and stronger human intelligence to protect American interests. Bannon noted the growing calls for regime change in Jerusalem, stating, "Maybe in Jerusalem they should start thinking about that,” underscoring deepening mistrust if Israel’s manipulation of intel proves true. A major strategic reset may be necessary.