Wednesday, July 10

This is Natalie’s 4 year Anniversary on the WarRoom program!

Wolf: Steve Bannon Imprisonment Parallels To The First 6 Months Of 1933 Germany

In the War Room interview, Naomi Wolf and Dave Brat discuss Steve Bannon’s incarceration and the consequences of lawfare. Wolf argues that Bannon’s imprisonment at Federal Correctional Institute Danbury aims to silence him, comparing it to historical examples of suppressing opposition. She warns that silencing Bannon sets a dangerous precedent, potentially leading to the suppression of other dissenters. Wolf emphasizes the need for collective action to oppose political imprisonment and protect liberty.

Brat agrees, praising Wolf’s insights and noting the historical significance of defending individual freedoms. He questions why conservatives seem less effective at mobilizing than liberals, attributing it to conservatives’ individualism and an optimistic, sometimes naive, belief in America’s resilience. Wolf suggests a deeper awareness of historical dangers is necessary to defend liberty effectively.

The conversation also touches on pharmaceutical industry issues, with Brat criticizing monopolistic practices and advocating for a truly free market. Wolf concludes by calling for continued support for Bannon and vigilance against threats to freedom. The interview highlights concerns about political persecution and the need for unified resistance.

Paoletta: The Left Is Still Furious With SCOTUS And Resorting To Unprecedented Attacks

In a conversation on the WarRoom, Mark Paoletta and Dave Bratt discuss the unprecedented nature of President Biden’s recent attacks on the Supreme Court. Paoletta highlights that Biden’s public criticism of the Court and specific justices, such as Thomas and Alito, is unprecedented and dangerous, with historical comparisons only to isolated instances by former Presidents Obama and Nixon. Paoletta argues that Biden’s motivation is to gain approval from the “lunatic left” and outdo Obama, which he claims undermines the integrity of the Court.

Paoletta also mentions the increased attacks on Justice Clarence Thomas by Biden and other Democrats, particularly regarding allegations of ethical violations. He notes that these attacks are part of a broader trend of undermining the Supreme Court’s authority and calls for lawyers who work with the Court to defend its integrity.

Dave Bratt ties these issues to a larger context of what he sees as Marxist deconstruction by the left, impacting not just the judiciary but multiple institutions. He criticizes the double standards in the application of justice, pointing out the lack of accountability for Democratic figures while Republicans face severe scrutiny and legal action.

Bratt and Paoletta also discuss Representative Anna Paulina Luna’s efforts to hold Attorney General Merrick Garland in contempt of Congress for not complying with a subpoena related to recordings that might incriminate him in mishandling classified documents. They stress the need for accountability and urge their audience to pressure Republican representatives to support the contempt resolution.

The conversation underscores a belief that current political attacks and legal actions are part of a broader, ideologically driven effort to undermine conservative figures and principles, necessitating a strong and organized response from conservative supporters.

Wren: Maricopa County Key Fob Indicted On 3 Felonies, But Not Trial Until After The Election

Caroline Wren and Maureen Bannon discuss the recent arrest of an individual in Maricopa County who pleaded not guilty despite clear evidence of guilt. They highlight the suspicious timing of his trial, set for November 6th, the day after the general election. They speculate that his detention without bail until then is politically motivated to prevent him from speaking to the press. They question why someone with a history of theft was allowed near sensitive election materials and suggest he was paid to steal the key fobs for the Maricopa County tabulators. They argue this incident supports claims of election interference, especially given past issues with malfunctioning tabulators in Maricopa County. They call for continued investigation into the individual’s background and motives, asserting that this case exemplifies broader issues of electoral integrity.