Rep. Eli Crane Debunks USSS Reasons For Security Failure After Visiting Sight Of Shooting

In a Wednesday discussion between Congressman Eli Crane and Dave Brat on the WarRoom. Crane expressed concerns regarding the assassination attempt on Donald Trump and the subsequent investigation. Crane highlighted the skepticism surrounding the Secret Service’s narrative and elevated the need to evaluate the evidence critically. He emphasized that many Americans are not buying the “surface narrative,” saying, “Many of us have been calling this out for months that they were going to try and assassinate Trump.”

Crane pointed out various issues he had with the investigation so far, including the positioning of Secret Service counter-sniper teams and their lack of presence on a water tower that provided a strategic vantage point. He stated, “If Secret Service would have put their counter-sniper teams on that water tower… he wouldn’t have even made it close to that roof.” Crane expressed disbelief at the Secret Service’s claim that the roof was too steep for sniper placement, as he and a 70-year-old colleague easily accessed it.

Crane also questioned the Secret Service’s actions, suggesting that law enforcement had full access to a building with a clear view of the shooter’s position. He mentioned, “It would have been so easy for anybody looking out that window to dispatch the shooter.”

Crane concluded by urging further investigation, asserting, “We’ve got a lot of questions that need answering.” He underscored the importance of accountability, transparency, and the need to uncover who gave the orders regarding the security arrangements that day.

Erik Prince Calls For Congressional Investigation Of Failed Assassination Attempt

Eric Prince shared his insights with Dave Bratt and concerns regarding the federal handling of the assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump. His comments focused on the need for greater transparency and accountability, criticizing the current state of federal investigations and security measures.

Prince commended Congressman Eli Crane for his investigative efforts, praising him as a “capable Brave frogman” and emphasizing the need for more individuals with real-world experience in Congress. He expressed frustration with the current federal response, saying, "The amount of AI and other nonsense being thrown to confuse and obfuscate is high.” Prince suggested that a public interview with experts, including former Secret Service agents and sniper specialists, might be the only way to resolve the situation. He argued that confidence in the FBI’s ability to conduct impartial investigations is waning due to political compromises.

Prince highlighted specific failures in the security arrangements during the event in Butler, Pennsylvania, noting, "There were four post standards, four Secret Service agents, able to be deployed… I think there was only one full-time Secret Service agent actually in the protective detail immediately around Trump.” He contrasted this with the protection provided to Jill Biden, who had twelve agents at a similar event. Prince criticized this disparity, suggesting that it reflects a broader incompetence within federal agencies.

Josh Hammer Says To Let Kamala’s Record Failures Speak For Themselves

Josh Hammer offered a critical analysis of current U.S. politics and the state of federal institutions. Hammer emphasized the chaotic atmosphere in Washington, D.C., due to Prime Minister Netanyahu’s visit, juxtaposing it with the domestic upheavals following significant events like Biden’s withdrawal from the race and Kamala Harris’s problematic performance.

Hammer critiqued the Biden administration’s inconsistent support for Israel and highlighted the Democratic Party’s drift towards far-left policies. He described Harris as an “avatar of far-left crazy” and expressed skepticism about her viability as the Democratic nominee, asserting, “The Democrats are going to regret this decision.” Hammer argued that Biden, despite his flaws, would have been a more strategically sound choice for the party compared to Harris, who he criticized for her poor approval ratings and ineffective vice-presidential performance.

Addressing the nation’s divisions, Hammer proposed a return to federalism as a practical solution, suggesting that many issues should be handled at state or local levels. He warned against the status quo’s gradual decline and dismissed the idea of a national divorce, calling instead for a figure capable of uniting the country on shared values.

BREAKING: NGO’s Caught Offering Voter Registration Forms To Migrants At Detention Centers

Rosemary Jenks from the Immigration Accountability Project (IA Project) criticized both political parties for their roles in illegal immigration. Jenks argued that the Biden administration’s policies, including the executive order mandating voter registration information at federal agencies, are contributing to illegal voting. She claimed that migrants, often misled by non-English forms and inadequate explanations, are being inadvertently registered to vote—a felony that jeopardizes their immigration status.

Jenks highlighted the current unprecedented levels of illegal immigration as a consequence of intentional policy decisions, accusing the Democrats of seeking to manipulate voter demographics for political gain. She criticized both parties for pursuing cheap labor, which she argues harms American workers and inflates living costs. Jenks emphasized the need for transparency and accountability, accusing politicians of deceptive practices and calling for the Immigration Accountability Project to hold them accountable.

She provided evidence to Dave Bratt, including charts from Senator Ron Johnson’s office, to support her claim of historical levels of illegal immigration under the Biden administration. Jenks also pointed out contracts, such as one from New York City requiring migrant centers to distribute voter registration forms to all “persons,” not just citizens. She stressed the urgency of exposing these issues to ensure fair elections and protect American workers from the negative impacts of unregulated immigration policies.

James Rickards: The Economic Factors Slowing China Down – Debt To GDP, Kleptocracy, And More

In this segment, Dave Brat and economist James Rickards painted a grim picture of China’s economic future while proposing a revival of American manufacturing as a solution. Rickards, a long-time critic of China’s economic strategies, detailed how China’s current economic troubles could have significant global repercussions, especially for the United States.

Rickards highlighted China’s struggles with high debt-to-GDP ratios and a collapsing real estate sector. He described the situation in China as dire, emphasizing the wasted investment in ghost cities and the country’s inability to transition from low-value to high-tech manufacturing. "A big part of China’s GDP is investment, not consumption. If the investment is wasted, their GDP has been less than half of what they’ve been publishing,” Rickards said. He further criticized China’s reliance on stolen technology, noting that this strategy is nearing its end.

Addressing the broader impact, Rickards warned of a potential economic fallout for the U.S. should China’s economy falter. He underscored the risk of global financial instability, suggesting that the consequences of a Chinese economic collapse could be profound for American markets.

Rickards proposed a solution in the form of "American Plan 2.0,” inspired by historical economic strategies from figures like Alexander Hamilton and Abraham Lincoln. He advocated for protective tariffs and investment incentives to bolster U.S. industries and reduce dependence on foreign manufacturing.

"We need to put up the towers, protect U.S. industry, and encourage investment in America,” Rickards asserted. He drew parallels to past American successes in manufacturing, suggesting that a renewed focus on high-tech and domestic production could spur economic growth.

Rickards also critiqued the current economic policies in the U.S., noting that high levels of government debt and an over-reliance on government jobs are undermining economic progress. He called for a shift towards policies that support American workers and industries while addressing the broader implications of global economic shifts. "Invest in U.S. industry and close the border to prevent wage suppression,” Rickards concluded, emphasizing the need for a robust economic strategy to navigate the challenges ahead.

Dave Walsh Exposes Kamala’s Radical Energy Plan

Energy expert Dave Walsh illuminated the significant implications of a potential ban on fracking and its impact on the U.S. economy, particularly in the context of Kamala Harris’s policy proposals.

Walsh detailed Harris’s stance on energy, highlighting her strong opposition to fracking and offshore drilling. "Kamala Harris has been adamant about a full ban on fracking and any kind of offshore drilling,” Walsh said. He critiqued the broader energy policies advocated by Harris, which include pushing for environmental justice and government-capped utility costs. Walsh pointed out that California has already experimented with capping utility costs, which he described as "appalling for efficiency,” arguing that such measures obscure real electricity costs through government subsidies rather than promoting efficient usage.

Walsh emphasized the crucial role of fracked natural gas in the U.S. energy landscape. "About 70 percent of the natural gas we use is fracked,” he explained, noting that natural gas accounts for 42 percent of the country’s electricity supply. He warned that banning fracking would lead to a dramatic increase in electricity costs, which have already risen by 31 percent since the start of the current administration. Walsh projected that if such policies continue, electricity rates could triple over the next 15 years due to the unreliability of renewable sources like solar and wind compared to the steady output of natural gas plants.

He also contrasted energy policies under different administrations, noting that while President Trump’s energy policies favored domestic production and exportation, Biden and Harris’s approach could undermine the country’s energy independence and economic stability. "The top four export commodities in the U.S. are natural gas, oil, chemicals, and plastics derived from oil and gas,” Walsh said, stressing the importance of maintaining robust domestic production to support economic stability and manage trade deficits.

Walsh’s analysis underscores the potential economic ramifications of shifting energy policies and highlights the ongoing debate over balancing environmental goals with practical energy needs.

Rabbi Wolicki Praises Vance’s Pro-Israel Stance Due To Their Common Judeo-Christian West Ideals

Rabbi Wolicki addressed the complex dynamics of U.S.-Israel relations, particularly in light of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s upcoming speech. Wolicki emphasized two key points for the War Room audience to watch. Firstly, he noted the recent Knesset vote against a Palestinian state, which reflects a strong stance in Israel against a two-state solution. "Most of that nine were the Arab Knesset members, who are anti-Israel voting against calls for a Palestinian state,” Wolicki explained, highlighting the internal political pressures Netanyahu faces.

Secondly, Wolicki expressed concern about Netanyahu’s understanding of the current American political landscape, specifically the America First movement. "Does Prime Minister Netanyahu understand what the Republican Party and what the ascended MAGA movement is all about?” he questioned. He urged Netanyahu to align with the values of the America First movement, stressing the importance of shared Judeo-Christian values and mutual support. "If Israel’s fight is a fight for America as well, we should recognize that this war Israel’s fighting is just a kinetic front in the same war that you’re fighting over there,” Wolicki stated.

Wolicki also observed a shift in Israeli and American Jewish political attitudes. He noted that while many American Jews have become progressive, younger Israelis are increasingly right-wing and conservative. "The Israeli population is right-wing and nationalist… younger Israelis are more right-wing, more faithful to God, more conservative in their politics,” he remarked. This shift, he suggested, offers a hopeful future for U.S.-Israel relations grounded in shared values and a common adversary.

Senator Rand Paul: The FBI And DHS Has No Right To Regulate The Internet

Senator Rand Paul provided a nuanced perspective on several key issues impacting American democracy and governance. His comments shed light on his views regarding capitalism, government intervention, and the Federal Reserve.

Paul emphasized the importance of capitalism as a democratic force. "The greatest form of democracy is capitalism where you vote with your dollars every day,” he stated, contrasting it with the often misinterpreted concept of democracy as presented in mainstream media. Paul supported the free market and argued that "bigness” in business is not inherently negative if achieved through consumer choice rather than government intervention.

Addressing concerns about trust-busting and regulation, Paul criticized proposals to regulate major tech companies like Twitter as utilities. He recalled his negative experience with regulated utilities, saying, "I’m old enough to remember when Ma Bell… was a regulated utility, and you had to wait in line for a terrible, ugly, black phone.” Paul cautioned against government overreach in regulating the internet, warning that it could lead to undesirable consequences if political control shifts.

On the issue of government censorship, Paul supported legal actions against government overreach in social media censorship, such as in the Missouri vs. Biden case. He argued that "the government does not have a right to use a private company to censor our speech,” reflecting his commitment to protecting First Amendment rights.

Regarding the Federal Reserve, Paul criticized both Congress and the Fed for their role in inflation. "Congress borrows about two trillion dollars a year,” he said, adding that the Fed’s purchase of government debt contributes to currency dilution and rising prices. He dismissed liberal arguments blaming businesses for high prices, asserting that "it’s Congress and the Fed that causes the high prices.”