Thursday, July 25

(Ret.) Col. Derek Harvey: “[Kamala Harris] Is The Most Liberal Senator That’s Been In The US Senate”

Derek Harvey relays the reactions from others about how radical and far-left Democrat Kamala Harris is viewed from her time in the US Senate.

Kamala Harris’s Scarlett Letter | Josh Hammer Exposes Why Democrats Can’t Engage The DEI Criticism

In a conversation between Josh Hammer and Ben Harnwell, they discuss the implications of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives as a successor to affirmative action in university admissions and corporate hirings. Hammer criticizes these initiatives, arguing they lead to discrimination against white people, Christians, and Asians, framing them as part of a modern intersectional identity politics mindset.

He refers to Justice Clarence Thomas’s idea of a “Scarlet Letter” effect, explaining how affirmative action and DEI practices impose a “badge of inferiority” on those they aim to help. Hammer states, “You are a black or Hispanic person who gains admission to a university or is hired in a corporation…you have a Scarlet Letter,” highlighting his view that such practices harm more than help.

They also discuss the Democrats’ shifting narrative, questioning Joe Biden’s ability to lead into the 2024 elections and the strategic implications of Kamala Harris potentially taking the lead. Hammer expresses skepticism about Harris’s ability to appeal to crucial swing states like Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan, suggesting that a “die-hard leftist Senator from California” might struggle in these regions.

The Costs Of Illegal Immigration

In a conversation between Ben Harnwell and Colonel Derek Harvey, the focus is on the current immigration policy debate in the U.S. and its political implications about having Democrat Kamala Harris as President. Colonel Harvey criticizes Joe Scarborough’s attempt to reorient American political discourse towards pro-immigration policies, describing it as “total spin and an adult adulation of the Reagan philosophy.”

He emphasizes that the Republican Party, along with Donald Trump, supports legal immigration that aims to “bring in the best and the brightest” who integrate into society. Harvey highlights the stress illegal immigration places on public services, mentioning that “nearly 10 percent of our students being, you know, illegal immigrant children” contribute to challenges in schools and housing.

He notes, “we have veterans and elderly people that are getting half of what these illegal immigrants are getting,” arguing for a more controlled immigration system. Citing polls, Harvey states that “55 percent of Hispanic and black communities here in America are for deportation,” reflecting broader societal concerns over current immigration policies.

Mark Mitchell Exposes Americans’ True Feeling On Kamala’s Policy Failures

In this conversation between Ben Harnwell and Mark Mitchell, they discuss the American public’s views on immigration and the potential impact of these views on the upcoming election. According to Mitchell, the current administration’s handling of immigration has significantly influenced public opinion. He notes that “by a 60 to 15 or less margin, so four to one to five to one, Americans say the government is doing too little versus too much to prevent illegal immigration at the border.” This dissatisfaction is reflected in the public’s perception of the Biden administration’s immigration policies, which many believe are too lenient.

Mitchell emphasizes that immigration is a major issue for voters, ranking just behind the economy. He points out that Americans’ concerns about immigration were heightened with Joe Biden’s election, stating that the immigration index “plunged from like 125 down to the 80s where it is staying today,” indicating a significant shift in perception. He argues that this sentiment is driving more Democrats to cross over and vote for Trump, as “Trump is winning among Independents.”

Mitchell explains that the American public is not in favor of policies that allow for illegal immigration, and this stance is backed by NumbersUSA data, which regularly surveys American opinions on immigration. He explains that this sentiment is a key factor in Trump’s rising popularity, as “more Democrats would cross over to vote Trump than Republicans would cross over to vote Biden or Harris.”

Mitchell also addresses the skepticism surrounding the integrity of the election process, mentioning the concern of potential electoral manipulation, stating, “All they have left at this point is cheating.” He suggests winning the swing states is crucial for the Democrats, yet polls show Trump leading in these areas. He cites data from Rasmussen’s polls that show Trump leading in several key swing states, including Arizona, Pennsylvania, Georgia, and Wisconsin.

Mitchell’s analysis suggests that the current administration’s immigration policies have alienated many voters, creating a significant challenge for Kamala Harris and the Democrats. As Mitchell puts it, “there’s a level of cheating in this country bigger than anybody expected,” indicating a deep-seated distrust in the electoral process, further complicating the Democrats’ strategy.

BALLOT FRAUD SHOCK POLL: 28% Of People Who Voted By Mail Admit To Committing One Form Of Fraud

In their ongoing discussion, Ben Harnwell and Mark Mitchell also focus on the alarming findings from recent Rasmussen polls regarding election integrity and public sentiment. Mitchell reveals that 66% of Americans are concerned about potential cheating affecting the 2024 election, a significant increase from previous years. This concern spans across party lines, with 78% of Republicans, 60% of Independents, and even 50% of Democrats expressing worry.

Mitchell highlights a disturbing detail: “18% of every voter in the country said they received more than one official ballot or a ballot for someone who does not live at their address.” This points to potential issues with mail-in voting. Additionally, 28% of mail-in voters admitted to committing ballot fraud.

One of the most shocking revelations is that in a recent poll of 2,500 likely voters, 9% either did not confirm their U.S. citizenship or were unsure of their status despite claiming they voted in 2020. Mitchell calls this finding “stunning” and indicative of broader problems in the electoral system, stating, “Anything can go in our elections right now.”

Harnwell emphasizes the gravity of these findings, stating that they underline fears of electoral manipulation and a broken system. He warns that these issues could lead to significant challenges in the upcoming election if unaddressed.

Josh Hammer Highlights Kamala’s Radical Policy Past And Record-Low Approval Rating

In this discussion, Col. Derek Harvey, Ben Harnwell, and Josh Hammer critically assessed Vice President Kamala Harris’s political standing and implications for the 2024 election.

Col. Derek Harvey expressed skepticism about Harris’s appeal, describing her as a “far-left San Francisco Democrat,” aligning her to the left of Bernie Sanders. He highlighted Harris’s extreme policy positions from her presidential campaign, such as banning fracking and offshore drilling and supporting open borders and universal socialized medicine. Harvey noted that Harris’s far-left stance, coupled with her record of low popularity, suggests she might struggle to resonate with swing voters in key battleground states like Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin. He remarked, “Kamala Harris is a well-known already defined figure and the American people don’t like what they see.”

Ben Harnwell emphasized the broader implications of Harris’s unpopularity. He remarked on the media’s attempt to redefine Harris’s role, pointing out that despite efforts to portray her differently, her established record and poor performance in the 2020 primaries have made her a controversial figure. Harnwell argued that the ongoing attempts to bolster Harris’s image are unlikely to succeed, given her historical unpopularity and “terrifying” prospects for the Democrats.

Josh Hammer echoed concerns about Harris’s potential impact on the election. He questioned the Democrats’ strategy of potentially relying on Harris to appeal to younger and minority voters, arguing that her policies might alienate more traditional voters. Hammer noted that Harris’s far-left positions might not mitigate the losses the Democrats are facing, stating, “Kamala Harris has a negligible boost in some of the national horse race polling,” and suggesting her role might not effectively address the Democrats’ broader electoral challenges.

Overall, the discussion painted a critical picture of Harris, portraying her as a problematic choice for the Democrats due to her extreme policy positions and poor popularity.

Mark Mitchell Debunks Kamala’s Path To Electoral Success

In the discussion, Mark Mitchell critiques Kamala Harris’s candidacy and her challenges. He argues that Harris’s record and policies, including her far-left stances and ineffective handling of immigration issues, are significant obstacles. Mitchell points out that Harris’s support remains weak despite attempts to present her differently: “Kamala Harris is a well-known already defined figure, and the American people don’t like what they see.”

Mitchell emphasizes the public’s dissatisfaction with Biden’s administration and its handling of border issues, noting that Harris’s role as “border czar” is particularly problematic: “There’s a significant discrepancy between the public’s disapproval of current immigration policies and Harris’s perceived competency.”

He also highlights a shift in voter sentiment favoring Trump, with more Democrats potentially crossing over to support him than vice versa: “Trump is winning among independents and more Democrats would cross over to vote Trump than Republicans for Biden or Harris.”

Mitchell predicts that issues like border security may influence the election and suggests that the Democrats might rely on electoral manipulation rather than straightforward campaigning: “If they get their candidate in office, it will be thanks to cheating more than a fair election.”

The 2020 Taught The American People These Elections Are Not Really In The Hands Of The People

Monica Crowley discusses the internal Democratic turmoil surrounding Kamala Harris’s candidacy and Barack Obama’s influence. She notes that despite ongoing briefings against Harris, it increasingly seems she will be the Democratic nominee due to the logistical and political difficulties of replacing her at this stage.

Crowley highlights a New York Post report revealing Obama’s frustration with losing control over the nomination process, as he reportedly preferred Mark Kelly over Harris and felt sidelined by Biden and Pelosi’s maneuvers. She also addresses growing concerns about election integrity, echoing fears that future elections might be rigged, as the public becomes more aware of tactics like ballot harvesting and mail-in voting.

Crowley warns that Harris, despite current vulnerabilities, should not be underestimated if she has managed to navigate around powerful figures like Obama, advising Trump’s campaign to stay vigilant for potential strategic shifts from the Democrats.

Part One:

Joe Biden And Nancy Pelosi BOX Barrack Out To Install Coup Candidate, Monica Crowley Exposes

Part Two:

Brussels Singles Out Conservative Hungary and Slovakia As ‘Rule-of-Law’ Violators

Ben Harnwell and Ellen Fantini discussed recent developments in the European Parliament, focusing on controversial practices undermining nationalist and populist representation. Fantini, managing editor at The European Conservative, highlighted a story about how the European Parliament’s leadership has excluded nationalist candidates from key positions.

Despite strong electoral successes for nationalist and populist groups, including the European Conservatives and Reformists, the Patriots, and the Alternative for Germany, the leftist coalition in the parliament has manipulated the system to strip these groups of leadership roles. Fantini criticized Ursula von der Leyen’s re-election as European Commission President, noting her commitment to marginalizing right-wing factions despite her election lacking popular support. The leftist coalition’s actions, which violated parliamentary rules and gender quotas, were described as a blatant disregard for democratic principles, with one MEP accusing them of betraying 18 million voters. Harnwell invited Fantini to return and further explain these developments to a broader American audience, emphasizing the undemocratic behavior of the left in Brussels.

Rabbi Pesach Wolicki Breaks Down Netanyahu’s Congressional Speech

In a discussion between Ben Harnwell, Derek Harvey, and Rabbi Pesach Wolicki, key points were raised about recent U.S. Congressional reactions and Israeli military strategies. Rabbi Wolicki addressed Nancy Pelosi’s criticism of a speech that praised Donald Trump and subtly criticized the Biden administration. Wolicki criticized the portrayal of Israel’s war with Hamas, asserting that the key narratives of insufficient humanitarian aid and excessive civilian casualties were misleading. He emphasized that Israel has ensured aid delivery and minimized civilian harm through precise targeting and careful strategy.

Wolicki also criticized the notion that a two-state solution is feasible, highlighting that recent Palestinian unity efforts undermine this possibility. He stressed the importance of achieving unequivocal victory over Hamas to enable lasting peace, drawing parallels to post-WWII demilitarization and de-radicalization. Harnwell echoed this view, criticizing the Western tendency towards managing conflicts rather than seeking decisive outcomes. Both emphasized that Israel’s fight represents a broader struggle for Western civilization against radical ideologies.