Monday, July 29

Renz: FDA’s Emergency Use For Bird Flu Vaccines Is To Make Them “Covid Vaccines 2.0”

In a recent interview, Tom Renz expressed concerns about the government’s handling of public health and potential future pandemics. He criticized Dr. Peter Hotez’s call for federal action against anti-vaccine sentiment, stating, “Uncle Vernon there apparently does not care anymore about the Constitution now than he did before.” Renz argued that the government capitalized on the COVID-19 pandemic financially and fears similar tactics could be used with the avian flu, citing the FDA’s recent emergency use authorization for bird flu vaccines. He noted, “I think the same thing is happening. They have this…they’re prepping this the same way that they prepped COVID.”

Renz highlighted the controversial gain-of-function research conducted in the U.S. and accused government agencies of potential complicity in creating public health emergencies. Additionally, he raised concerns about national security, questioning the response to an alleged assassination attempt on Donald Trump and implying systemic failures within federal agencies. Renz calls for more transparency and accountability from government entities to prevent history from repeating itself.

Rep. Burchett Has No Confidence In Speaker Johnson’s Taskforce To Investigate Assassination Attempt

Congressman Tim Burchett criticized major tech platforms like Google and Facebook for censoring content related to former President Trump, such as an iconic image of Trump with his fist in the air. Burchett remarked on the pressure these platforms face to reduce access to such images, noting that leaked memos advised media to avoid showing them, as they might glorify Trump. “This is basically a plausible deniability type operation with what Facebook is doing,” Burchett said, pointing out the use of near-duplicate hashing technology to throttle certain images.

Burchett also highlighted Nancy Pelosi’s alleged foreknowledge of the Capitol breach on January 6th, criticizing her for denying requests for additional security and seemingly being pleased with the breach. He raised questions about the involvement of federal agencies like the FBI and DHS in these events, suggesting that more transparency is needed: “If they’re going to dox our agents for good press, we have a right to know who screwed up here.” Burchett emphasized the importance of accountability and transparency in government actions, especially regarding national security and public trust.

Benz: Finding Out Who Dropped The Ball In Butler Will Lead To Who Is Responsible

Mike Benz expressed significant concerns about potential governmental involvement and mishandling regarding a recent shooting incident, highlighting the possibility of a cover-up. Benz speculates that a government agent or informant may have been involved with the shooter, given the sophisticated nature of the attack. He questions why a Secret Service agent was not present on a roof that offered the president a direct line of sight, suggesting that this absence may indicate a coordinated effort involving rogue elements within the Secret Service or DHS. Benz also points out that Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), a unit within DHS, has a history of infiltration and could have played a role in the incident. He argues that understanding the roles and actions of the individuals involved, particularly the officer who left the roof, is crucial for uncovering any government orchestration.

Benz criticizes Speaker Johnson’s current investigative task force, suggesting it lacks the resolve to hold high-ranking officials accountable and focus on systemic issues within DHS and other agencies. Additionally, Benz touches on tech censorship, linking it to broader efforts to control narratives, as seen in the suppression of certain images and discussions related to the incident. Overall, Benz calls for transparency and accountability to understand the potential government connections to the shooting fully.

Bensman: Kamala Harris Tries To Separate Herself Politically From The Border Crisis

In a conversation between Kari Lake and Todd Bensman, they criticize the Biden administration’s handling of immigration and border control, particularly focusing on Vice President Kamala Harris’s role. Bensman argues that the administration is pushing a “false narrative” that everything is under control at the border, but claims that Harris’s strategy to address “root causes” in Central America has failed. He cites the increased number of migrants crossing the U.S. border as evidence of this failure and blames President Joe Biden’s policies for dismantling effective border control measures from the Trump administration.

Lake and Bensman argue that the administration’s actions have led to a humanitarian crisis, citing the rise in fentanyl-related deaths as a significant concern. They assert that Biden’s policies encourage illegal immigration and that the administration’s attempts to portray themselves as tough on immigration are misleading. Bensman also claims that the recent decrease in illegal crossings is temporary, attributed to election-driven pressure on Mexico to control migration. He warns that this situation will worsen if the current policies continue post-election. The discussion emphasizes the need for stricter border security and suggests that American citizens are suffering due to current immigration policies.

Hamadeh: Kamala Harris Doesn’t See The Border As An Actual Issue, Only An Electoral Issue

In a discussion between Kari Lake and Abe Hamadeh, both strongly criticize the Biden administration’s handling of border security and immigration issues. Lake praises Hamadeh, saying, "My good friend Abe Hamadeh running for Congressional district eight here in Arizona, Trump endorsed and kicking butt.” The conversation emphasizes the failure of Vice President Kamala Harris’s approach to border management. Hamadeh claims that the administration aims to “flood our country with millions of illegal immigrants” and highlights concerns about criminals and terrorists entering through the southern border. He argues that “drug cartels are working with radical Islamic terrorists” and stresses the need for strict policies, pledging to designate drug cartels as foreign terrorist organizations.

Hamadeh criticizes the administration’s treatment of illegal immigrants, claiming they receive more benefits than American citizens and veterans, who struggle with rising costs. He points out that the Biden administration’s policies hurt retirees and younger generations, making homeownership unaffordable. Both Lake and Hamadeh advocate for a return to Trump-era policies to secure the border and restore economic stability. They highlight the need for election integrity, referencing recent Venezuelan elections and emphasizing the importance of free and fair elections. Hamadeh expresses gratitude for support from Lake and other influential figures and promises to fight against corruption and restore justice if elected.

Kent: Major Realignment And Awakening Due To Biden-Harris Disastrous Policies Destroying America

In a recent discussion between Joe Kent and Kari Lake, Kent, a Gold Star husband running for Congress in Washington, expressed optimism about his campaign despite the challenging political landscape. Kent highlighted the growing frustration among voters due to inflation and the southern border crisis, which he believes are pushing more people toward conservative solutions. He praised the endorsement from former President Trump and emphasized his commitment to addressing these critical issues, noting, “We have a huge fentanyl epidemic…every state is basically a border state.”

Kent also criticized the left for radical policies and expressed concern over election integrity, suggesting that problems in states with mail-in voting contributed to these issues. He encouraged supporters to get involved and donate to his campaign at JoeKentForCongress.com, asserting that grassroots support is crucial against well-funded Democrat opponents. Kent’s message was clear: despite challenges, he remains hopeful and committed to turning the tide through active campaigning and voter engagement.

Engelbrecht: True The Vote Has Made Over 750k Challenges In Effort To Clean Up Voter Rolls

In a recent conversation between Catherine Engelbrecht, founder of True the Vote, and Kari Lake, Engelbrecht praised Lake’s commitment to election integrity and her endorsement. Engelbrecht highlighted the efforts of True the Vote’s new project, IV3, which focuses on cleaning up voter rolls ahead of the August 7 deadline, noting, "We’ve had citizens from all over the country…researching and submitting about 750,000 challenges.”

Engelbrecht addressed recent criticism from CNN, describing it as a coordinated attack on their efforts. She emphasized that the backlash indicates the significance of their work, saying, "If CNN’s doing a hit piece on this, they’re very worried that real people are saying, ‘I don’t want to see dead people on the voter roll.’” She urged citizens to get involved by visiting True the Vote’s website or IV3.us to contribute to the project and help clean up voter rolls, especially in states like Arizona where issues are prevalent. Engelbrecht’s message was clear: public participation is crucial for effective election reform.

Paoletta: Joe Biden Is The Most Malignant Force For The Supreme Court In Modern Times

A Supreme Court expert, Mark Paoletta, has strongly criticized President Joe Biden’s recent proposal to reform the Supreme Court. Paoletta argues that Biden’s plan to impose 18-year term limits and enforce an ethics code is a misguided attempt to undermine the Court’s independence. He states, “Joe Biden is the most malignant force on this for the Supreme Court in modern times,” accusing the left of seeking to dismantle the Court’s recent conservative shift, which has overturned precedents like Roe v. Wade and race-based affirmative action.

Paoletta likens Biden’s proposal to court-packing efforts seen in authoritarian regimes, noting that the left’s goal is to transform the Court into a rubber stamp for their policies. He warns that such changes would erode judicial independence and threaten the constitutional framework of the United States. For those interested in opposing these measures, Paoletta suggests following his updates on X for more information and ways to get involved.