Tuesday, July 30

Mark Paoletta Exposes The Democrats’ Radical Plan To Appoint NINE More Supreme Court Justices

In a conversation with Ben Harnwell, Mark Paoletta discussed President Biden’s recent proposals regarding the Supreme Court, including a constitutional amendment for an 18-year term limit on justices and an enforceable code of ethics. Paoletta emphasized the constitutional challenges and political motivations behind these proposals, describing them as part of a broader effort by the left to undermine the judiciary. He remarked, “This continues the ratcheting up…by the left to destroy it,” referring to the attempts to alter the Court’s structure. Paoletta argued that the proposals, including the term limit and ethics code, are unconstitutional, noting that justices are appointed for life to ensure independence from political pressures.

He further explained the historical context, referencing FDR’s court-packing attempt, and criticized the current proposals as similarly dangerous despite their unlikelihood of success. Paoletta stated, “The Supreme Court has an ethic of code of ethics…there’s no ethics crisis,” dismissing the need for external enforcement. He highlighted the danger of increased politicization of the Court, suggesting that Biden’s proposals aim to control it by potentially expanding the number of justices and limiting their jurisdiction. Paoletta also pointed out the hypocrisy in Congress’s ethics, mentioning figures like Sheldon Whitehouse and Bob Menendez to illustrate the lack of accountability within the legislative branch. He concluded by urging the public to defend the integrity of the Supreme Court against partisan attacks.

Part One:

Mark Paoletta: “This Is Our Greatest Supreme Court In 100 years, and That’s Worth Defending”

Part Two:

Democrats Publicly ATTACK Supreme Court After Raging At Trump’s Success Of Appointing Judges

Part Three:

The Disinformation Campaign Against Project 2025

In his discussion with Ben Harnwell, Paul Dans responded to criticisms of Project 2025, particularly regarding its lack of focus on Supreme Court reforms. Dans argued that Project 2025 is primarily centered on revitalizing the executive branch and does not address the judiciary because its main goal is to restore executive power. He noted, “The project like Mark had said is really an approach to the executive branch… We have to start with the executive branch where the president really is the sole repository of the executive power.” Dans criticized critics who claimed the project overlooks Supreme Court reforms, suggesting that these critiques are part of a broader misinformation campaign.

He emphasized that Project 2025 aims to combat a “permanent government” that excludes ordinary citizens and advocated for a return to constitutional principles, asserting, “The swamp isn’t going to drain itself. We need outsiders coming in and committed to this.” Dans defended the project against accusations of hidden agendas, clarifying its focus on reforming executive branch operations and boosting conservative engagement in government.

Trump-Endorsed MO Senate Candidate Bill Eigel Confronts RINOs And Leftists In Missouri

In a recent interview, Ben Harnwell spoke with Bill Eigel about the ongoing political developments in Missouri, focusing on Eigel’s gubernatorial campaign and broader state issues.

Eigel, who is running for governor, announced the significant endorsement from Donald Trump, stating, “I just got it secured the endorsement of Donald J. Trump for my candidacy to be the next Governor of the state of Missouri.” He contrasted his campaign with his opponents, criticizing them for their positions on abortion and illegal immigration, and for accepting funding from prominent liberal figures. Ikeel criticized opponent Mike Keith for supporting amnesty and Jay Ashcroft for accepting donations from Bill Gates’s family.

Discussing his campaign’s core messages, Eigel emphasized his commitment to stringent immigration policies and tax reforms. He asserted, “Our immigration stances, a big part of that… We’re reporting, entertaining and arresting every single one that we can get our hands on,” and highlighted the need to cut personal property taxes on vehicles, a unique burden in Missouri.

When asked about JD Vance, who is on the national ticket, Eigel expressed strong support, noting that Missourians are enthusiastic about Vance’s vice presidential candidacy. He dismissed leftist criticisms as irrelevant, suggesting they are driven by a broader agenda against Trump and his allies. Ikeel said, “Missouri is a solid Trump State. We’re going to deliver our electoral votes for the president here in January.”

Eigel, who will be one of Missouri’s ten electors, emphasized the importance of grassroots support for his campaign.

The conversation also touched on recent legal developments in Missouri. Eigel praised a court decision supporting Senator Mike Moon’s legislation to ban transgender hormone therapies and surgeries for minors, describing these procedures as “barbaric” and expressing relief that the court upheld the ban.

Todd Bensman: Yes, Kamala Harris Ran Biden’s Utterly Disastrous Effort To Increase Mass Migration

Todd Bensman  discussed his article for The Federalist on Vice President Kamala Harris’s role in managing the U.S. southern border. Bensman addressed the controversy over Harris’s official title and role, emphasizing that the focus should be on her actual responsibilities rather than her job description.

In his piece, Bensman argues that despite debates over what title Harris holds, she has been central to the Biden Administration’s border strategy, known as the "root causes Doctrine.” This strategy aims to address mass migration by rebuilding the Central American countries from which many migrants originate, with the goal of reducing the reasons people leave their homes. Bensman criticizes this approach, pointing out that it leaves the border open during the long period needed to implement these changes.

Bensman highlights that Harris was appointed to this role, and he provides evidence of her public statements and press conferences where she claimed credit for the efforts and successes of this strategy. He stresses, “The anchor is still attached to her on this border,” suggesting that her involvement remains significant regardless of the title or formal responsibilities attributed to her.

Bensman said he will provide further details on the topic in a later segment, but his article underscores that Harris’s involvement in border management, through her promotion and leadership of the “root causes Doctrine,” has had a tangible impact on current border issues.

Gina Swoboda Explains How To Secure YOUR Vote In Arizona And Effort To Safeguard Our Elections

Gina Swoboda provided an update on the current voting situation in Maricopa County, Arizona where turnout is notably high she said. As of the latest report, nearly 5,000 Republicans, 1,200 independents, and 1,000 Democrats had voted in person. Swoboda, working in the legal War Room, noted some technical issues, including malfunctioning tabulators and printer problems. However, she praised Maricopa County elections for maintaining communication and working to resolve these issues.

Swoboda emphasized the importance of voters not leaving a polling location if they encounter equipment problems. "If you check in and they’re not letting you check out, stay on site until the equipment is fixed,” she advised. Leaving without checking out could result in having to vote provisionally. She stressed the necessity of properly checking out to ensure that votes are counted and promised to follow up with Maricopa County to improve training and address these issues before the general election.

Swoboda also mentioned that the current issues could affect the Attorney General race. She plans to update on social media only if there are significant alerts and encouraged voters to reach out for assistance if needed.

Sam Faddis On USSS Failure

In a discussion between Sam Faddis and Ben Harnwell, they critically examined recent events concerning the Secret Service’s response to a shooting incident targeting President Trump and the situation in Venezuela.

Faddis expressed grave concerns about the Secret Service’s failure to prevent a shooting attempt on Trump, noting that “everything went wrong.” He criticized the lack of effective security measures, emphasizing that an “emotionally disturbed, 20-year-old” managed to breach security and attempt an attack. Faddis described the situation as “obscene” and suggested that multiple layers of command within the Secret Service should be held accountable for the “catastrophic” failure.

Shifting focus to Venezuela, Harnwell criticized U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken for advocating electoral integrity in Venezuela while ignoring similar issues domestically. He highlighted the Venezuelan regime’s fraudulent practices, including “throwing out the National Election Council” and replacing it with loyalists. Harnwell remarked that despite “crystal clear” evidence of election manipulation, the U.S. has supported Maduro’s regime, enriching him while ignoring democratic principles. He projected that the outcome will hinge on whether Venezuela’s armed forces decide to oppose Maduro, suggesting that “the only thing that really will matter” is their stance. Harnwell anticipates a critical decision within the next 24 to 48 hours, focusing on whether the armed forces will shift allegiance or maintain their support for the current regime.