Friday, August 2

Dr. Navarro: The Kamala Krash And Biden’s Horrible Hostage Negotiations

Peter Navarro introduced the term “Kamala Crash” to describe the stock and bond market downturns he attributes to the current political climate. He credited Scott Besson for coining the term and expressed plans to create T-shirts with the slogan.

Navarro mentioned the one-month anniversary of Steve Bannon’s imprisonment, noting their shared four-month sentence. He highlighted potential early release under prison reform legislation and emphasized the unfair treatment he received compared to Bannon, stating, “Steve should be out much earlier.”

Navarro criticized the Wall Street Journal for its hypocrisy in supporting his imprisonment while advocating for their reporter detained in Russia. He explained, “The legislative branch should never have the power to subpoena senior presidential aides or the president himself.”

Discussing the recent hostage exchange between the U.S. and Russia, Navarro condemned the strategy, suggesting it sets a dangerous precedent. He argued that trading an innocent reporter for a convicted assassin emboldens adversaries like Putin, leading to more unjust detentions in the future.

In the broader context, Navarro linked market fluctuations to political dynamics, asserting that Wall Street favors Trump’s economic policies over the current administration’s. He suggested that Trump’s potential return signals lower taxes and regulation, beneficial for the economy.

In conclusion, Navarro tied the economic outlook to political cycles, underscoring the importance of understanding market signals and their implications.

Robert O’Brien Exposes The Biden-Harris Administration’s Failures In Hostage Situations

In this discussion with Peter Navarro on War Room, former National Security Advisor Robert O’Brien criticized the Biden administration’s approach to hostage negotiations. He highlighted three controversial exchanges: WNBA star Brittney Griner for arms dealer Viktor Bout, corporate executives for Venezuelan money launderer Alex Saab, and Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich for assassin Vadim Krasikov. O’Brien argued that these swaps set a dangerous precedent by incentivizing hostile nations and terrorists to detain Americans for leverage, warning, “You’re creating a perverse incentive for the bad guys.” He contrasted this with the Trump administration’s strategy, where they avoided trading dangerous criminals, leveraging national power instead. O’Brien praised Trump’s strength, saying, “I couldn’t have been an effective negotiator if I didn’t have Trump’s power to rely on.” He advocated for a more assertive approach, using economic and diplomatic pressure to secure American hostages without compromising security or principles.

Richard Baris Reveals Voters Fear Democrats’ Radical Abortion Policy

In a discussion led by Peter Navarro and Richard Barris, they emphasize the need to focus on policy rather than personal attacks against Kamala Harris in the upcoming election. Navarro advises against “slut-shaming” and personal criticisms of Harris, especially by older white men, as it risks alienating women voters. Instead, they should highlight Harris’s policy support for Joe Biden’s administration, especially on issues like the economy, foreign policy, crime, and the weaponization of the justice system. Navarro argues that Trump should focus on his policy successes, such as economic growth and peace deals, as Trump leads in these areas except for abortion. Barris agrees that abortion is the only issue where Harris has a significant lead and suggests a more aggressive strategy on this issue, emphasizing late-term abortion and state-level decisions. They conclude that Trump can win on policy issues, advising focusing on economic policies rather than cultural issues like Harris’s background. Additionally, they note that Democrats are trying to energize their base, but the public’s perception of lawfare against Trump is shifting in Trump’s favor.

Part One:

President Trump’s 52% Approval Rating Arose From No New Wars, Prosperity, And Peace Under Trump

Part Two:

Matthew Boyle: JD Vance Must Hammer “The Effects Of Globalization That Kamala Supports”

Matt Boyle emphasizes the strategic importance of focusing on the economic and political impacts of globalization, particularly concerning China, in the upcoming elections. Boyle agrees with Navarro’s suggestion that JD Vance should campaign heavily in swing states like Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania, highlighting how globalization and China’s economic aggression have devastated American industries and workers. He points out that the movie “Hillbilly Elegy” fails to address China’s role in these issues, reflecting Hollywood’s tendency to omit such politically sensitive topics. Boyle notes that Vance is already addressing these issues in his rallies, emphasizing the negative impacts of globalization driven by the Chinese Communist Party on American workers.

Boyle stresses the need for the Republican campaign to remain proactive and aggressive, especially with less than 100 days until the election. He advocates for a robust media presence and diverse surrogates to communicate the campaign’s message effectively. Boyle suggests Trump should deliver concise, policy-focused speeches in significant locations to address key issues like manufacturing and immigration. He highlights the importance of grassroots engagement and urges the campaign to maintain a relentless pace, emphasizing that success in the election will depend on continuous and vigorous efforts.