Saturday,  August 3

Col. Derek Harvey Explains The Aggressive Force Behind Conflicts In The Middle East

In this segment Ret. Col. Derek Harvey and Dave Brat covered significant geopolitical and domestic issues, focusing on the Middle East, China, and the U.S. political landscape. Col. Harvey began by highlighting the escalating tensions in the Middle East, emphasizing Iran’s strategic maneuvers against Israel. He pointed out that Iran is orchestrating a multi-front campaign against Israel, involving groups like Hezbollah, Hamas, and others, with the intention to "coordinate a simultaneous attack” as revenge for past assassinations. Harvey warned of the wider implications, stating, "Iran is behind all of this, and this is an ongoing conflict that is going to reach a high point soon.” He also noted the roles of China and Russia in this complex geopolitical landscape, suggesting that these powers aim to weaken American influence by destabilizing Israel and undermining alliances like the Abraham Accords.

The conversation shifted to China, exploring its economic and strategic ambitions. Harvey pointed out China’s extensive efforts to form alliances and increase its influence globally, particularly through initiatives like the Belt and Road. Brat remarked, "They are building a huge alliance, chipping away at our reserve currency, and winning over countries slowly and steadily.” However, he also acknowledged China’s internal challenges, such as economic debt, demographic problems, and a lack of innovation, which could hamper its long-term strategic goals. Col. Harvey responded by highlighting China’s sophisticated tactics in global diplomacy and military expansion, arguing that the U.S. has underestimated China’s ambitions. "Our State Department fails in comparison to what they’re doing. We need a complete relook,” he insisted, emphasizing the need for the U.S. to reassess its strategies to counter China’s growing influence.

The conversation then turned to U.S. domestic politics, with Col. Harvey and Brat reflecting on past and potential future administrations. Brat expressed frustration over the lack of strategic planning during the previous Trump administration, noting, "We promised seven years to repeal Obamacare, and we didn’t even do that.” He criticized the absence of a cohesive plan despite having control of the Senate, House, and Presidency. Col. Harvey echoed these sentiments, stressing the importance of understanding the political landscape and the need for loyal personnel who align with the administration’s goals. He stated, "You can’t put people in charge who do not buy into the president’s agenda,” underscoring the pitfalls of appointing officials who may not support the administration’s vision.

Col. Harvey concluded by addressing the challenges of dealing with the Deep State and the administrative complexities within the U.S. government. He emphasized the need for strong leadership and clear strategies to navigate these challenges, highlighting the importance of commitment to the “America First” vision. Harvey warned that without strategic foresight and unity, future administrations might face similar obstacles that plagued the previous ones. He pointed out, "Trump’s going to need a close-knit group of people that understand who these people really are and what they have done.” This underscores the necessity for an administration to be fully prepared and aligned to effectively implement its policies and navigate the intricate political landscape.

Part One:

Col. Derek Harvey: No One Was Held Accountable

Part Two:

Bradley Thayer Hammers Necessity To Confront Illegitimate CCP Regime

In a discussion between Dr. Bradley Thayer, a China expert, and Dave Brat, the focus is on the significant geopolitical influence of China and its potential threat to global stability. Thayer concurs with Colonel John Mills’s analysis that “China is behind” most global hotspots, emphasizing that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is akin to Reagan’s view of the Soviet Union as “the center of evil in the modern world.” Thayer argues that China’s political and military strategies are designed to “undermine the United States and our interests,” highlighting their expansion into Africa, South America, and Southeast Asia as part of their broader plan to overthrow the U.S. and its allies.

Brat brings up the mixed reports about China’s economic health, noting both “negative news on the economy” and their “intelligent long-range plans” like the Belt and Road Initiative. Thayer acknowledges China’s economic slowdown but warns that the CCP’s accumulated power makes them dangerous, especially under Xi Jinping’s aggressive leadership. He stresses that China is “at war with us today,” albeit not in a kinetic way, drawing parallels to the Cold War dynamics with the Soviet Union.

Thayer argues that the U.S. should stop investments and trade with China, urging a focus on “people of goodwill” globally to oppose the CCP’s “illegitimate government.” He argues that the CCP’s lack of a popular mandate and tyrannical methods make them a threat that must be countered strategically, even if they appear not ready for full-scale war. Despite potential economic weaknesses, Thayer asserts that the CCP is committed to its goals, leveraging its “military might, diplomatic power, and technology” against perceived adversaries.

Mike Benz: The Four-Letter Agencies Are Killing The Ability To Operate An Independent Website

In this discussion Mike Benz and Dave Brat explored how “media tsunamis” and censorship shape political outcomes. They highlighted a strategy post-2016, where U.S. government entities like the State Department and Pentagon allegedly suppressed alternative media sources that challenged mainstream narratives.

Benz explained how these agencies sought to “kill advertising revenue to alternative news sources,” such as War Room, Real America’s Voice, and Breitbart, which were seen as threats after events like Trump’s election and Brexit. Benz described the emergence of “censorship mercenary firms” like NewsGuard, which rate news organizations’ credibility to impact their ad revenue. He mentioned that these firms have blacklisted over 650 websites, including those questioning COVID-19 narratives, effectively redirecting billions in advertising dollars away from them. Benz’s research, published by the Foundation for Freedom Online, revealed that the government funds these censorship efforts through major ad agencies receiving federal contracts worth billions, suggesting a rigged media landscape favoring government-aligned outlets.

Benz also linked this to ESG strategies, comparing media control to economic governance. Dave Brat reinforced this point by highlighting Benz’s findings of government-funded media initiatives similar to past CIA projects like Mockingbird, which aimed to create a pro-government media environment. Benz called for cutting federal funds to such agencies, drawing parallels with efforts to divest from ESG-focused firms like BlackRock. The conversation underscored concerns about government influence in media, as Brat noted: “The entire playing field of media is rigged in favor of the government’s preferred outlets.”

Gordon Chang: The CCP “Wants To Rule The Moon And Mars As Sovereign Chinese Territory Without War”

In this War Room discussion, Gordon Chang and Dave Brat explore China’s geopolitical ambitions and its current strategies. Gordon Chang opens by addressing the notion that China does not seek a “kinetic” or conventional war. Instead, Chang argues that China aims to expand its influence and territorial control without engaging in direct conflict, focusing on proxy wars and indirect means. He cites China’s support for Russia’s war in Ukraine, Iran’s attacks on Israel, and insurgencies in North Africa as examples of such proxy wars. China is also engaging in aggressive activities with the Philippines, Taiwan, Japan, and India, which may lead to direct conflict.

Dave Brat highlights China’s reliance on its economy to fuel military expansion and international projects like the Belt and Road Initiative. However, Chang points out that China’s economy is faltering, possibly contracting, which could weaken its ability to project power. This economic decline, Chang suggests, poses a risk as President Xi Jinping might see a narrowing window of opportunity to assert dominance and could act more provocatively.

Chang emphasizes that Xi Jinping is facing domestic challenges, with personal accountability for China’s economic and demographic issues. This pressure may incentivize Xi to seek quick victories to consolidate power and suppress dissent within the Communist Party. He suggests that the Philippines might be a target for such aggression, as Xi perceives it as an easier target than Taiwan.

In conclusion, Chang warns that this is the most dangerous period in history, potentially more perilous than the Cuban Missile Crisis. The unpredictability of leaders like Xi Jinping, Kim Jong-un, and Vladimir Putin, combined with what Chang perceives as weak U.S. leadership, creates a volatile global situation. Chang promotes his upcoming book, Plan Red: China’s Project to Destroy America, emphasizing the need for vigilance and strategic planning in response to China’s maneuvers.

William J. Federer Walks Through How The God Gives You Value, Not Your Intersectionality Group

William Federer joined Dave Brat to discuss the essence of Christianity, emphasizing its role in shaping the concept of individual worth. Brat introduced the conversation by reflecting on Christianity’s portrayal of forgiveness versus judgment, suggesting that sometimes Christians “give ourselves a bad image” by being judgmental rather than forgiving, as exemplified by John the Baptist and Jesus Christ. Federer elaborated on the idea that the Judeo-Christian faith introduced the notion of individual value, independent of societal status. He explained, “Your worth is dependent on the group… and their king,” contrasting this with the Judeo-Christian belief that individuals are valuable because they are “made in the image of the Creator.”

The discussion highlighted the Declaration of Independence’s assertion that rights are endowed by a Creator, challenging the idea that rights come from the government. Federer pointed out that, historically, kings claimed divine authority, while America’s founders believed in a direct relationship between the Creator and the individual. He referenced Eisenhower, who said, “If the state gives rights, it can and inevitably will take away those rights.”

The conversation also explored modern liberalism’s deviation from these principles. Brat questioned whether one could maintain the logic of individual rights without the foundational belief in a Creator. Federer argued that modern liberalism often bases worth on “intersectionality,” where worth is contingent on group identity, deviating from the biblical view that all individuals have inherent worth.

Federer emphasized the importance of confronting wrongdoing within Christian teaching, noting that “rebuke your neighbor directly” is part of loving them, as it helps maintain moral accountability. He warned against Christians’ silence on moral issues, such as gender ideology, saying, “If you’re really Christian, you’ll be silent while we teach your kids the trans agenda.”

Federer with a call to action for Christians to defend their beliefs actively, even against modern societal pressures, asserting that silence in the face of moral decline equates to complicity. Federer asserted, “If the body of Christ is not serious about spreading the Gospel, at least don’t keep your mouth shut when they’re mutilating little children,” urging Christians to uphold their values in a post-modern world.