Wednesday, 02 July 2025

[DS]/China Fighting Back,Trump Drops The Hammer,Peace Through Strength,World Is Watching – Ep. 3670

X22 Report
Hits: 9

SPREAD THE WORD

Podcast: Download (Duration: 1:36:44 — 39.3MB)

Watch The X22 Report On Video

pt>

Trump wants the green tax credits removed, energy should not be subsidized by the government. This was only in place for [DS]/[CB] agenda. The [CB] is trying to push the oil prices up by shutting the Straight of Hormuz, this will fail because the oil field in Alaska are opening up. Trump puts the spotlight on the Federal Reserve and calls them out. The [DS]/China are trying to fight back, this will not work, Trump has removed the ability for foreign [DS] nations to receive intelligence, Trump can hit them at anytime. Trump is now sending a message to the [DS] to surrender and he wants the people of Iran to rise up and take back their country. Peace through strength. The world is watching.

 

Economy

  SUBSIDY!). Also, it is almost exclusively made in China!!! It is time to break away, finally, from this craziness!!!

Interior Dept. Proposes Opening Up 82 Percent Of Alaskan Petroleum Reserve

  • The Department of Interior (DOI) released a draft analysis that proposes reopening up to 82 percent of the 23-million-acre National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska (NPR-A) to oil and gas leasing and development, the agency said in a June 17 statement.
    •  
  • NPR-A was set aside as an emergency oil supply for the U.S. Navy by President Warren Harding in 1923. In 1976, the reserve was transferred to the DOI’s Bureau of Land Management (BLM).
  • In 2022, the Biden administration announced the closure of almost half of the NPR-A reserve to oil and gas drilling, overturning a policy from the first Trump administration that sought to boost oil development in the region.
  • The latest proposal reverses the Biden-era restrictions, “consistent with the Trump administration’s commitment to Energy Dominance and regulatory reform,” the DOI said.
  • The proposal supports a presidential action, “Unleashing Alaska’s Extraordinary Resource Potential,” signed by President Donald Trump on Jan. 20, 2025.
  • The action highlighted that Alaska has an “abundant and largely untapped supply of natural resources” that could deliver energy price relief for Americans, ease trade imbalances, and create high-quality jobs.
  • “Under President Trump’s leadership, we’re cutting red tape and restoring commonsense policies that ensure responsible development and good stewardship of our public lands,” he said.
  • The Biden-era rule had closed roughly 11 million acres of NPR-A to oil and gas extraction and restricted construction on another 2 million acres.

  • Source: zerohedge.com

    •   something that is good for the elite, or is good for the young, or is good for some versus others.” “If it is well done, and if it is well implemented, it would be of service to all citizens.” CBDCs not only enable authorities to track who spends what, where, and when—they are programmable, allowing money to be restricted for specific uses, the imposition of expiry dates, and the ability to freeze or limit spending based on user behaviour or location. Once integrated with digital ID, facial recognition, social credit scores and carbon allowances, CBDCs facilitate totalitarian control on an unprecedented scale.

    The European Central Bank (ECB) is targeting October 2025 to complete the preparation phase for the digital euro, not to launch it. The actual launch is not expected until 2027 or later, pending legislative approval and further development
      ways. I’ve been nice, I’ve been neutral, and I’ve been nasty, and nice and neutral didn’t work! He’s a dumb guy, and an obvious Trump Hater, who should have never been there, I listened to someone that I shouldn’t have listened to, and Biden shouldn’t have reappointed him. We have virtually No Inflation, our Economy is doing really well, and will soon be doing, with the tremendous Tariff Income coming in, and Factories being built all over the Country, better than it has ever done before. If he was concerned about Inflation or anything else, then all he has to do is bring the Rate down, so we can benefit on Interest Costs, and raise it in the future when and if these “other elements” happen (which I doubt they will!).  Don’t say that you think there will be Inflation sometime in the future, because there isn’t now but, if there is, raise the Rates! We should be at the TOP of the attached List, not the bottom. I don’t know why the Board doesn’t override this Total and Complete Moron! Maybe, just maybe, I’ll have to change my mind about firing him? But regardless, his Term ends shortly!

    Political/Rights

     HISTORIC, and very good for our Country. Thank you for your attention to this matter!

    WATCH: President Trump Destroys “Incompetent Governor” Gavin Newsom, Signals National Guard Could be Used in Other Sanctuary Cities: “We Saved Los Angeles”  

  •  
    • source: thegatewaypundit.com

     defend Law abiding Americans. Congratulations to the Ninth Circuit, America is proud of you tonight!

    DOGE

    Geopolitical

    Belarusian President Lukashenko Frees Opposition Leader and 13 Other Political Prisoners After 6-Hour Meeting With US Envoy Keith Kellogg, in Victory for Trump Diplomacy

  • US envoy Keith Kellogg got 14 political prisoners freed in major success.
  • Kellogg helped score a win for the peace efforts by the Trump administration.
  • While the situation in the Middle East keeps escalating, with unpredictable developments ahead, there are many other aspects of the US foreign policy unfolding, and some bring a great deal of hope of a better tomorrow.
  • After a visit by Donald J. Trump’s Special Envoy Keith Kellogg to Belarusian leader Lukashenko, no less than 14 political prisoners have been released, including Siarhei Tsikhanouski, a leading Belarus opposition figure.
  • Tsikhanouski was freed on yesterday (22), after more than five years in prison. He was driven across the border into Lithuania and reunited with his wife Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya, leader of the exiled Belarus opposition.
  • Five Belarusians, three Poles, two Latvians, two Japanese, one Estonian and one Swede were freed in total.

    • Watch: 

     

    Source: thegatewaypundit.com

    War/Peace

  •   Secretary of State/National Security Advisor Marco Rubio restructured the National Security Council, and when he did that “Europeans and those in the Middle East” lost their ability to “plug-in” to their contact sources. The “cultivated sources” they used were no longer in place.  It’s only about a minute on that aspect, but revealing when you consider influence operations and the push to war.

    • Source: theconservativetreehouse.com

    Image

    Whether or not you agree with Trump’s decision, it’s impressive that he was able to accomplish this feat with zero US casualties, and Iran evacuated their facilities before the strikes, so no civilian casualties reported as of now either.

    Oh No! AOC and Other Unhinged Dems Say Trump’s Iran Attack Is Clearly Grounds for Impeachment

    https://twitter.com/ProudElephantUS/status/1936607272890707993?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1936607272890707993%7Ctwgr%5Efe148d59091468312eeb3c04937715eee3dbb505%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fredstate.com%2Fbobhoge%2F2025%2F06%2F21%2Foh-no-aoc-and-other-unhinged-dems-say-trumps-iran-attack-is-clearly-grounds-for-impeachment-n2190756

    Source: redstate.com

    Image

    The bombings of Libya, Iraq, and Syria by the U.S. over the years have varied in their legal justifications, with some tied to the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) linked to 9/11, while others relied on different rationales. Below is a concise analysis of whether U.S. bombing campaigns in these countries were connected to 9/11, focusing on key instances:
    1. Libya
  • Key Bombing Campaigns:
  • 2011 NATO-led Intervention: The U.S., under President Obama, participated in airstrikes to enforce a UN Security Council resolution protecting civilians during Libya’s civil war against Muammar Gaddafi. Strikes targeted Libyan military assets.
  • 2015-2016 Airstrikes: The U.S. conducted bombings against ISIS targets in Libya, particularly in Sirte, as part of the anti-ISIS campaign.
  • Connection to 9/11:
  • 2011: The Libya intervention was not justified under the 2001 AUMF or tied to 9/11. Obama relied on Article II of the Constitution and UN authorization, citing humanitarian protection. The 2001 AUMF was not invoked, as Gaddafi’s regime had no direct 9/11 link.
  • 2015-2016: These strikes were tied to the 2001 AUMF, as they targeted ISIS, which the U.S. considered an “associated force” of al-Qaeda (the 9/11 perpetrators). The legal argument was that ISIS’s global jihadist ideology connected it to the 2001 AUMF’s scope.
  • Summary: The 2011 bombings were unrelated to 9/11, while 2015-2016 strikes were justified using the 2001 AUMF due to ISIS’s perceived al-Qaeda ties.
    • 2. Iraq
  • Key Bombing Campaigns:
  • 1998 Operation Desert Fox: Under President Clinton, the U.S. and UK bombed Iraqi military sites to enforce UN resolutions on weapons inspections.
  • 2003-2011 Iraq War: The U.S. invaded Iraq, with extensive airstrikes, under President Bush, followed by ongoing operations.
  • 2014-Present: The U.S. conducted airstrikes against ISIS in Iraq as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, targeting ISIS strongholds like Mosul.
  • Connection to 9/11:
  • 1998: These strikes predated 9/11 and were unrelated, justified under UN resolutions and Article II to counter Iraq’s weapons programs, not terrorism tied to al-Qaeda.
  • 2003-2011: The Iraq War was partially linked to 9/11. The Bush administration used the 2002 AUMF (specific to Iraq) but also cited 9/11 broadly, claiming Saddam Hussein might provide weapons to al-Qaeda. No evidence substantiated Iraq’s 9/11 involvement, and the 2001 AUMF was not the primary legal basis (though it was later used for counterterrorism in Iraq).
  • 2014-Present: Airstrikes against ISIS were explicitly justified under the 2001 AUMF, as ISIS was designated an “associated force” of al-Qaeda, extending the 9/11 authorization to these operations.
  • Summary: 1998 bombings were unrelated to 9/11. The 2003 invasion had rhetorical 9/11 connections but relied on the 2002 AUMF. Post-2014 strikes were directly tied to the 2001 AUMF via ISIS.
    • 3. Syria
  • Key Bombing Campaigns:
  • 2014-Present (Operation Inherent Resolve): The U.S. began airstrikes against ISIS in Syria, targeting Raqqa and other strongholds.
  • 2017-2018 Strikes: Under President Trump, the U.S. bombed Syrian government targets (e.g., Shayrat airbase) in response to chemical weapons use.
  • Connection to 9/11:
  • 2014-Present (ISIS): These strikes were justified under the 2001 AUMF, as ISIS was considered an al-Qaeda offshoot or “associated force” linked to the 9/11 authorization. The U.S. argued the AUMF covered operations against ISIS in Syria despite no direct 9/11 connection to the Syrian regime.
  • 2017-2018 (Syrian Government): These strikes were not tied to 9/11 or the 2001 AUMF. Trump relied on Article II, citing humanitarian concerns and deterrence of chemical weapons use, not terrorism.
  • Summary: ISIS-focused bombings were linked to the 2001 AUMF and 9/11 through the al-Qaeda association, while strikes on Syrian government targets were unrelated to 9/11.
    • Conclusion
  • Libya: 2011 bombings were unrelated to 9/11 (UN-based, Article II); 2015-2016 strikes were tied to the 2001 AUMF via ISIS.
  • Iraq: 1998 was pre-9/11 and unrelated; 2003 had rhetorical 9/11 links but used the 2002 AUMF; 2014-present strikes were tied to the 2001 AUMF via ISIS.
  • Syria: ISIS strikes (2014-present) were linked to the 2001 AUMF; government strikes (2017-2018) were unrelated to 9/11. The 2001 AUMF, rooted in 9/11, was central to ISIS-related bombings but not to earlier or non-terrorism-focused strikes, which relied on other legal bases. For xAI-related inquiries, see https://x.ai/grok or https://x.ai/api.
  • Libya: 2011 bombings were unrelated to 9/11 (UN-based, Article II); 2015-2016 strikes were tied to the 2001 AUMF via ISIS.
  • Iraq: 1998 was pre-9/11 and unrelated; 2003 had rhetorical 9/11 links but used the 2002 AUMF; 2014-present strikes were tied to the 2001 AUMF via ISIS.
  • Syria: ISIS strikes (2014-present) were linked to the 2001 AUMF; government strikes (2017-2018) were unrelated to 9/11. The 2001 AUMF, rooted in 9/11, was central to ISIS-related bombings but not to earlier or non-terrorism-focused strikes, which relied on other legal bases. For xAI-related inquiries, see https://x.ai/grok or https://x.ai/api.

    • Democrats cry about the War Powers Act, and some conservatives worry about a long war 

  •  

    • They’re all wrong, of course.

  • First, regarding the constitutional issue, the Constitution gives the president several powers, indicating that he has complete control to make overseas military strikes to protect American interest
  • In Art. II, Sec.1, the Constitution gives him “executive power” generally, which has always been understood to mean the power to guide America’s foreign policy. Article II, Sec. 2 makes him Commander in Chief of the military, and gives him the implied power to deal with foreign nations, limited only by the explicit requirement that the Senate provide advice and consent for actual treaties. Lastly, Art II, Sec. 3 gives him the sole authority to deal with ambassadors and other public ministers.
  • All those powers, especially the Commander-in-Chief one, cease to have meaning if Congress gets to oversee his every military decision. Just imagine if, before every military action, the president had to consult with and get a buy-in from all 541 members of Congress. It would take months to agree on anything (assuming agreement could be reached), and operational secrecy would be impossible.
  • Second, given the broad foreign and military powers the Constitution grants the presidency, it’s doubtful if the War Powers Resolution (aka the War Powers Act), a relic of the Vietnam War, is even constitutional. Congress passed the Act to limit the President’s power to take American troops to a foreign war without Congress’s approval, something that would seem to limit severely the president’s express and implied constitutional powers. Still, no president has challenged it, so we’ll accept that it applies.
  • Under the Act’s terms, the president must notify Congress within 48 hours after deploying troops. Trump notified Congress while troops were still in the air. In other words, he complied with the law. End of story. No impeachment there.
  • So, as always, Democrats are wrong. 
  • Trump also has no interest in nation-building. Unlike multiple American presidents from Wilson to George W.  Bush, Trump believes the point of America going to war is to protect America, not to “make the world safe for democracy.” He will do whatever is necessary to keep American democracy safe, and that’s it. Regime change will be good for Iran, but that’s not Trump’s problem.
  • Source: americanthinker.com

    • Trump’s precise, carefully calibrated strike sends a strong message

  • While pundits scream “war,” President Trump is doing what the last three administrations refused to do—act with precision, clarity, and backbone. The strike on Iran’s nuclear infrastructure wasn’t a declaration of war. It was a declaration that America will no longer bow to the ds threats
  • This was not a reckless escalation. It was a measured, targeted response—a strike aligned with the Trump Doctrine: peace through strength, deterrence through clarity, and war only as the last resort. President Trump doesn’t seek conflict. He ends it. And he does so without sending American sons and daughters into endless foreign entanglements.
  • Critics have dusted off the War Powers Act as a scare tactic. But let’s be clear: Trump’s actions were not only lawful—they were long overdue.
  • Far from rogue, the strike was executed within the bounds of law—anchored in precedent, justified by threat intelligence, and wholly consistent with presidential authority.
  • And that message was not just for Iran. It was for the [DS], that he now controls the military, he has the power, surrender unconditionally
  • .
  • This wasn’t a march to war—it was the return of  American strength, and the ability to show the [DS] that we the people are in control now.

    • source: americanthinker.com

    https://twitter.com/JenniferJJacobs/status/1936617710445634003

      National security advisor/secretary of State Marco Rubio
    Chief of Staff Susie Wiles Deputy
    Chief of Staff Dan Scavino Deputy
    Chief of Staff James Blair
    Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt  NSC’s Andy Baker White House general counsel
    David Warrington Special envoy Steve Witkoff  

      exceeding $100 per barrel. Reserves would not save us from the pain. But that’s not all. Asian markets, including our allies, would be crippled and they will be very, very unhappy. 84% of the oil in the Strait is destined for Asia, including China, India, Japan and South Korea.

     

    The Middle East & China Connection  

  •  China takes 80% of Iran’s oil.

    •  

  •  The reason Iran can attack the Straits of Hormuz is that the media has unreported the completion of the China-Iran railway link,  
  •   Iran can shut down the Strait of Hormuz, and the Houthis keep the pressure on, stopping the traffic through the Suez Canal. They have the ability to impact the energy flow out of the Middle East significantly.
  •  the railway between China and Iran. The primary rail corridor connecting China to Iran became fully operational in recent years. Trains now run regularly from various Chinese cities (like Yiwu, Xi’an) through Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan, terminating in Tehran.

    • Source: armstrongeconomics.com

     

     

    country and then set up a never-ending basecamp. There is zero chance anything like that happens here. Less than Zero. This is how you use a military. The same way Trump did in his first term. Strategic attack, and then out. Al Baghdadi, the Chemical weapons site in Syria, The head of Al Qaeda and Soleimani.

    With a handful of moves he made irrefutable progress while starting no new wars. This will be the same. It’s also notable that during the early Q drops we were told (many times) that North Korea and Iran were deep state proxies whose strings they were attempting to cut. North Koreas Mountain that housed their nuclear mysteriously collapsed in Dec 2017, March 2018 the Q team said they had cut a deal to free NK and June 2018 Kim Jung and Trump were all smiles while making the public version of the deal wink wink. I have no doubt that any actions here on out are a part of this model (goal) and will never develop into a forever war. These are two extremely different situations. Bookmark this post/claim: This conflict will end in a peace treaty with Iran LONG BEFORE Trump leaves office, and will involve no ground Troops.

    Finally, going back to the notion of Iran being a deep state proxy-boogey man, it’s very likely the deep state is putting this entire thing on as a show in the first place with the Trump admin not taking the full bait (forever war). And that these eventual strikes are Trump turning it on them by striking deep state targets in Iran. I would assume with communication and help from Iran itself.

     

    1558

    Jun 19, 2018 1:55:48 AM EDT
    Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: c75415 No. 1809336 
    Free Iran!!!
    Fight Fight Fight
    REGIME CHANGE.
    People have the power
    . We stand with you.
    Q

    712

    Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 567809 No.325370
    Feb 10 2018 05:23:04 (EST)
    You will cease to exist.
    Truth to power.
    How’s the bunker these days?
    [14] live
    [Hello]
    [PEOC force failed]
    Q

    844

    Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: f879d5 No.554846
    Mar 5 2018 01:39:53 (EST)
    BOOM
    BOOM
    BOOM
    BOOM
    Q

    1216

    Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: 35d50c No.1124872
    Apr 20 2018 22:48:30 (EST)
    Anonymous ID: 3d9fc3 No.1124637
    Apr 20 2018 22:37:22 (EST)
    >>1124578
    >>1124578
    >>1124578Is @Snowden talking about us?
    >>1124637
    The world is watching.
    Q

    Medical/False Flags

      hospitalizations from Covid. Huh? Babies are literally at zero risk from Covid, and this senior “vaccine expert” wants your baby to take a dangerous jab for no reason at all. Pure evil.

    [DS] Agenda

    President Trump’s Plan

      Department, we will find you.

    Trump Calls For Special Prosecutor To Investigate Rigged 2020 Election

  • But the AP and its ilk just can’t bring themselves to disavow the lie of “the most secure in American history.”
  • Hemingway has detailed the myriad security problems with mail-in ballots, a Pandora’s Box opened under the cover of Covid, and the disturbing and game-changing involvement of leftist private money in U.S. elections.
  • “We have allowed the private takeover of government election offices by partisan oligarchs and their armies of activists who use those offices and their authorities to tilt the election toward favored candidates,” she said in her opening statement.
  • Zuckerberg poured hundreds of millions of dollars into a Chicago-based nonprofit group with deep ties to the Obama campaign under the auspices of “safe election” grants. The leftist Center for Tech and Civic Life pumped the lion’s share of that money into election offices in Democrat-led cities in critical battleground states. In swing state Wisconsin, as The Federalist has detailed, the funding in part paid for Democrat operatives to be embedded in election offices. In Green Bay, a New York operative was given the keys to the room where the absentee ballots were stored.
  • “Instead of having full security and a verifiable chain of custody for ballots being issued, cast, and counted, we flooded addresses across the country with tens of millions of unsupervised mail-in ballots months ahead of elections frequently to locations from which voters, if they’re even alive, have long since moved, instead of having election administration that is rigorously nonpartisan and impartial under the law,” Hemingway said.
  • A special prosecutor investigating the 2020 election would not only help shine light on some dark places in the troubled election year, but it could help bring accountability and greater security to an election system that remains anything but “the most secure in American history.”
  • Source: thefederalist.com


    • Source link

    Search