Conflicting reports out of the Middle East. For those keeping track:
Antiwar’s Scott Horton said his sources were predicting a U.S. strike as soon as last Monday (thought Horton hoped they were wrong).
Seymour Hersh is now reporting that “heavy” U.S. strikes are inbound until the Supreme Leader of Iran is removed.
Trump downplayed the WSJ story that he had “approved” strikes for Iran, essentially calling it fake news.
WH Press Sec Leavitt: Trump will make up his mind in two weeks.
Meanwhile Israel is threatening to launch attacks without the help of the U.S. and calls for all-out “regime change” are becoming all too common from the usual suspects.
That’s why last night, ZeroHedge hosted a debate: Should Trump support yet another Regime Change war in the Middle East?
Hosted by former Congressman Matt Gaetz, libertarian Dave Smith and author Robert Spencer engaged in fiery debate. Here were the highlights for those short on time:
Months away from a nuke since 1995…
Watch debaters react to Netanyahu’s decades-long claim that Iran is on the cusp of acquiring a nuclear weapon:
One of the best things about @ComicDaveSmith as a debater is that he doesn't let people squirm away. Watch to the end. @zerohedge debate — June 19, 2025 pic.twitter.com/dmFkQ7j0FZ
— Christian Malazarte (@ChristianMalaza) June 20, 2025
“Wake Up People”
Smith dissected the pro-regime change argument to its roots, first starting with the fact that intelligence has shown little evidence of pursuit of nukes, followed by proper policy if they were, and ending with Israel’s glaring hypocrisy on the topic of secret nukes:
The claim that Iran is pursuing nuclear weapons is unproven:
Historical precedent shows restraint is possible even with hostile nuclear development:
Launching a war over nuclear development is unjustified and a war of aggression:
Israel’s own secret nuclear arsenal makes its position hypocritical:
— ZeroHedge Debates (@zerohedgeDebate) June 19, 2025
“This is their justification for launching a war that they want to drag America into? I mean wake up people!”
“Death to America”
Spencer compares the current situation to U.S. aid to Britain before entering World War II:
“There was the Lend-Lease program. There was the propaganda war. There were all kinds of ways in which [Roosevelt] was aiding the side of freedom against the Nazis before Pearl Harbor.”
He implies the U.S. could support Israel similarly—providing material, strategic, and diplomatic support—without direct military involvement.
Spencer argues that it is consistent with the “America First” or MAGA agenda to prevent Iran from becoming a nuclear power:
“Trump... in his first political speech announcing he was going to run for president in 2015, he says, ‘Not going to allow Iran to get nuclear weapons.’”
He emphasizes that Iran’s hostility is not empty sloganeering:
“The Ayatollah Khamenei actually said not long ago… ‘When you chant death to America, it's not just a slogan, it's a policy.’”
Spencer then lists decades of Iranian-sponsored attacks:
“Tom Cotton asked Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin… has Iran attacked any American interests… and Austin says eighty-three times… and [the U.S.] responded four.”
By not retaliating to repeated Iranian attacks:
“That projects weakness if… you just let that keep happening and never respond.”
— ZeroHedge Debates (@zerohedgeDebate) June 19, 2025
Be sure to check out the full debate and subscribe to ZeroHedge Spotify, Rumble, and YouTube channels for more debates and our podcast on those channels hosted by comedian Rob Bernstein for weekly recaps on our most crucial articles.
Source link