FBI Director Suggests Trump Wasn’t Hit By A Bullet
During testimony at a Congressional hearing on Wednesday, FBI Director Christopher Wray suggested that President Trump may not have been hit by a bullet, buoying leftists who claim the assassination attempt was overhyped or even staged.
During the testimony, Rep. Jim Jordan commnted, “Director, I guess I’m not clear exactly where all — you said there were eight shell casings on the roof. So eight bullets were fired. We obviously know that Mr. Comparatore lost his life, two other — two other rally goers were injured, seriously injured, and then the one that hit President Trump.”
“Does that account for — was there — were some of these individuals hit multiple times?” Jordan asked, following up with the question “Where did all eight bullets go?”
Wray responded “I don’t have that in front of me. I’m happy to circle back and get that to you. It’s assuming we have that information yet.”
He then remarked “with respect to former President Trump, there’s some question about whether or not it’s a bullet or shrapnel that hit his ear.”
Wray continued, “So it’s conceivable, as I sit here right now, I don’t know whether that bullet in addition to, you know, causing the grazing, could have also landed somewhere else. But I believe we’ve accounted for all of the shots in the cartridges.”
Watch:
This comment has served to further encourage deranged Trump haters who are claiming that his ear isn’t damaged enough to be consistent with a bullet hitting it, with some even claiming that the shooting was staged.
I totally agree with him. It was plastic or glass shard
— Renegade Cowboy🐾🐾 🌊⚓️🌊🐾🐾 (@Rene_gadeCowboy) July 25, 2024
I just gotta think that if an ar-15 bullet gets that close, there's gotta be more damage than that
— Dark Rudy (@BoldRudy) July 24, 2024
OF COURSE IT WASNT A BULLET. That hospital is guilty of the biggest coverup in political history. If he was shot, they had an obligation to update the public on Trump’s condition.
— Jeff McGuire (@JeffMcGuire3) July 24, 2024
This expert in physics wants you to know that bullets can’t go horizontal:
Shrapnel. The shooter was high up. No way that bullet flew horizontally when it was fired from several feet above.
— Retta Holt (@Rettanastywoman) July 25, 2024
Mrs Gump admits she knows nothing but still suggests it wasn’t a bullet anyway:
I know didly squat about guns, ammunition. All that I've heard is that particular gun is high powered and used to kill. So. Wouldn't the bullet have caused more damage?
— Jane Gump (@SixtiesMom) July 25, 2024
They find it “nauseating” how the media didn’t attack Trump after he was nearly shot in the head:
Really nauseating how the press just went along with Trump’s version
— Guerry (@GGinCHS) July 25, 2024
Many such cases of TDS:
I think it most certainly was not a bullet. It's fully healed as of today, who knows how much earlier.
— Aaron Annecharico (@AAnnecharico) July 24, 2024
This idiot suggests it’s more dangerous being scratched by a cat than shot at by a homicidal lunatic with an AR15:
I've had cat scratches that bled more and took longer to heal. this whole thing is.. hinky.
— missk8 (@schrodingers_k8) July 25, 2024
This one says shaving is more fraught with risk:
I've bled more while nicking myself shaving.
— Rock (@rockhead21) July 25, 2024
Some are even mad that Wray didn’t go further and outright deny it was a bullet that hit Trump.
Where did this magic shrapnel come from then?
Shrapnel from what exactly? We literally saw the bullet
— yslburner ⚡️ (@yslburnerr) July 25, 2024
What does it even matter, even if it was shrapnel?
And this distinction between flying metal objects matters why?
— Tyler Amick (@MickTy96) July 24, 2024
Someone tried to kill Trump by firing bullets from a semi-automatic rifle at him, and almost succeeded.
Let’s say it was shrapnel, what does that change?
— INDPNDNT THNKR (@bvrhwzn) July 25, 2024
Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.
Source link