It's been nearly a month since the first use of the Russian "Oreshnik" system took the world completely off guard. But despite multiple angles of the strike on Dnipro, to most, it likely feels like we're no closer to a clear picture of its capabilities than we were the night it happened. Contradictory analyses have proliferated through social and mainstream media, and it's unclear what to believe. Various analysts have described the system as a series of "blanks" from a jerry-rigged nuclear ICBM - intended only as a warning shot - or as a new type of cluster munition where each of the 36 kinetic submunitions is roughly equivalent in power to a 250kg bomb (read my thread on this here). Some eyewitness reports of unknown credibility said the plant (or parts of it?) had been "reduced to dust." Other Ukrainian reports said minimal or even no damage had been done.
When the publicly available (and free) imagery from a pass of the ESA's Sentinel-2 satellite was published a few days after the strike, it only muddied the waters. The Sentinel is free for a reason, it has a poor 10m resolution (each pixel roughly represents 10 meters). Here's what it showed:
The Hunt
Most commercial satellite providers focus on sales to corporations, governments, and institutions. Those companies aren't interested in one-off sales to individuals (believe me, I tried). One option was accessing Planet Lab's imagery through Sentinel Hub, and I subscribed ($$$) and purchased 25 sq km of quota for Planet's SkySat after querying the area around Dnipro and seeing that SkySat (50cm resolution) had made multiple passes over Yuzhmash since the strike. I made a rookie mistake and ordered all the images taken between then and the first week of December, only to find that every one of them had nearly 100% cloud cover. Dnipro gets plenty of snow this time of year, and the forecast showed nothing but cloudy days ahead. Even the passes from the same day the Sentinel-2 did a flyby were from later in the day, when clouds had rolled in. That money had been wasted.
After giving up for a few weeks, I found another provider which offers images from Airbus's Pleiades-Neo constellation. Pleiades offers even better (30cm) resolution than SkySat and amazingly, it had already taken three separate shots of Yuzhmash on November 22nd, the morning after the strike. I don't think this is a coincidence. Someone likely requisitioned the constellation (something you can do with many satellites if you have the money) but, for whatever reason, chose to sit on the images rather than publish them. Luckily, the provider I found allows for selecting a very tight polygon for your order, with no minimum. I would be able to select just the territory of the plant, without the order running into the thousands of dollars. I suspected that some of the Oreshnik's projectiles likely landed outside the territory of the plant itself, but I had no choice but to select a polygon matching the plant's perimeter, due to the cost. I placed the order and waited around eight hours for it to complete. When done, I was given a 90MB PNG (13,000 x 9,000 pixels in resolution), a 1.1GB GeoTIFF (COG) file, and a JSON file of metadata for download.
Results
I spent the next several hours pouring over this massive image pixel by pixel. At this point, I feel reasonably confident that I've identified all damage caused by the Oreshnik on the territory of the plant that lies within the polygon I drew. I also believe we can make much more informed conclusions about the nature of this weapon and and its strategic potential.
But first, a few notes about this image. The satellite's angle in relation to the plant is 43.7 degrees "off-nadir," which is good because it allows us to see the height of buildings, but it adds some distortion and prevents us from seeing the north side of structures. The snapshot was taken at 10:18AM local time in Dnipro, in winter, which results in a significant amount of shadows because of the low angle of the sun (something like 20 degrees). I'll be comparing the images from Pleiades with older, publicly available images from Google and Apple Maps. Ideally, I'd have an older shot from Pleiades from the same angle and at the same time of day to compare with, but that was cost-prohibitive. The publicly available images are at much closer to a 90 degree angle, with the sun high in the sky, so objects will appear flattened and will be more brightly lit.
Also important to note is that the buildings at Yuzhmash are big. Really big. Many are taller than three stories with over 500,000 square feet per floor. Others are over ten stories tall. Keep that in mind when viewing the images. This kind of analysis has a learning curve.
First, a zoomed out view of all the visible damage to the plant. Red circles are high confidence, and yellow are low. Each circle doesn't necessarily represent one impact, but rather indicates damage of some kind. More on that in a moment.
Cassette A
First, the southernmost (lowest) building, with our image on the left and Google Maps on the right:
That's it for Cassette A.
From the damage we see in this first cassette, it's reasonable to draw the conclusion that the projectiles are moving fast enough to punch a hole straight through a roof and penetrate into the ground, leaving the upper floors of a building relatively intact. If the projectile happens to hit a key element of the building's foundation, it may cause it to collapse, but this isn't guaranteed. It is logical to assume that every projectile contains the same energy, and is capable of doing the same damage.
Cassette B
The damage to the southernmost building in Cassette B is extensive and complex. This is the damage that was visible even in the 10m resolution Sentinel-2 imagery. First, a high resolution image with its red circles still included:
Cassette C
There's much more distortion on this side of the image, but multiple hits are clearly visible.
I believe these images confirm Ted Postol's assessment that the Oreshnik's kinetic projectiles deliver the approximate energy of a 250kg bomb, though the nature of this energy is different. The projectiles are moving so quickly that they punch a hole through most anything until they hit the ground. When we see severe enough roof failure to get a good look at the damage, we see an impact crater 100ft in diameter and a lot of dirt. This implies that the projectile is penetrating into or through the foundation of the building. These structures were built by the Soviets and are extremely tough, so if the projectiles are capable of punching through them and reaching earth (or pulverizing the foundations enough that they look like earth), they're delivering a lot of energy.
The Russians have solved the problem of how to cost-effectively attack dispersed targets with a ballistic missile. That doesn't make it an all-powerful doomsday device, and it would likely take many Oreshniks to render a large facility like an air base (or Yuzhmash) completely inoperable. But the Russians do have the capability to mass produce them, and have openly stated their intent to do so, which makes the system a potential strategic game changer.
Source link