Saturday, June 22
BOMBSHELL: Vanderbilt University Medical Center Accused Of “Encouraging Transgender Lifestyle”
In a conversation between Steve Bannon and Michael Patrick Leahy, Leahy detailed disturbing findings related to Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC) and its handling of Audrey Elizabeth Hale, a transgender individual who committed a mass shooting at her former elementary school in Nashville. Leahy revealed that VUMC knew about Hale's intentions to kill her father and conduct a school shooting but did not alert anyone, despite Tennessee's duty to warn law. Additionally, Leahy reported that VUMC had been previously criticized for financially benefiting from transgender surgeries. A recent claim by a father alleged that VUMC might be grooming young girls to undergo such surgeries for profit. Bannon praised Leahy's efforts and urged the audience to follow the ongoing investigation on Tennessee Star’s website and support Leahy's legal defense fund.
Solomon On How The FBI Defense Briefings Could Expose President Biden's Foreign Business Dealings
In their discussion, John Solomon and Steve Bannon focused on whether Joe Biden received a defensive briefing about his son Hunter Biden's foreign dealings. Solomon explained that a defensive briefing is an intelligence tool used to inform public figures of attempts to infiltrate or compromise their organizations. He noted that while Hillary Clinton received such briefings in 2015, Donald Trump did not, highlighting a perceived bias in how these briefings are administered.
Solomon emphasized the importance of investigating if Biden and possibly Barack Obama were briefed about Hunter's connections with foreign entities like Burisma's owner, a Romanian oligarch, and a Russian oligarch involved in U.S. real estate. He argued that if Biden received these briefings yet continued to enable his son's actions, it could significantly impact the impeachment narrative. Solomon mentioned that Congress, led by Representatives Jordan and Comer, has requested intelligence committee records on any defensive briefings provided to Biden and Obama, which could clarify the extent of their knowledge and response to these foreign interactions.
Jeff Clark On The FBI And DOJ's Targeting Of President Trump
In their conversation, Steve Bannon and Jeff Clark discussed several significant legal and political issues. Bannon began by addressing the potential for a lengthy prison sentence for Trump, then shifted to the upcoming Supreme Court term, highlighting five major administrative cases, including those challenging the Chevron Doctrine, which grants deference to administrative agencies. Clark emphasized the importance of these cases, particularly for environmental regulations. They also touched on other crucial cases, such as those involving big tech and free speech, abortion restrictions, and January 6th prosecutions. The discussion included the potential implications of the Fisher case, which questions the interpretation of obstruction of justice statutes, and the immunity case, which could impact Trump's legal standing. They critiqued the Democratic approach to these legal battles, alleging biased treatment and improper judicial conduct. Lastly, they discussed gag orders related to Trump, suggesting these actions aim to hinder his presidential campaign and predict severe legal consequences.
Part One:
Clark: U.S. Supreme Court Set To Decide Five Major Administrative State Legal Cases In Next Week
Part Two:
Kash Patel Drops BLOCKBUSTER: Paul Ryan's Chief of Staff Held Crucial Evidence Since 2016
In their conversation, Steve Bannon and Kash Patel discussed Paul Ryan's involvement in the Russia collusion investigation and the Steele dossier. Bannon referenced Patel's tweets criticizing Ryan's character. Patel recounted how, in 2016, Paul Ryan tasked him and Devin Nunes with investigating Russia collusion, despite Ryan already possessing the Steele dossier. This dossier had been used unlawfully to surveil Donald Trump. Patel revealed that it was only in a British court case involving Christopher Steele that it was admitted Ryan had the dossier since 2016 but never disclosed it to the investigators. Patel criticized Ryan for allegedly rigging the investigation from the start and called out his hypocrisy in lecturing about conservative values. Bannon expressed disbelief at Patel's claim that Ryan withheld such crucial information. Patel confirmed that Ryan's staff had the dossier and that Ryan opposed declassifying related evidence. Bannon concluded by suggesting that Ryan should be interrogated under oath about his actions.
Rep. Bob Good Raises Concerns Of Irregularities And Suspicions Over Election Process In Virginia-5
In their conversation, Steve Bannon and Bob Good discussed concerns about election integrity in Virginia's 5th Congressional District. Good explained that in Lynchburg City, ballots were allowed to be dropped off two days after the election without proper security or accountability, raising suspicions about the legitimacy of the results. He accused his opponents of using tactics to blame his side for irregularities preemptively and claimed to have evidence to support his concerns. Good emphasized the importance of pursuing a recount and contesting the election to ensure a fair process. Bannon linked these issues to broader implications for the upcoming November elections, stressing the need for secure and fair voting practices. Good criticized the Youngkin administration and the GOP establishment for not addressing these concerns adequately and encouraged supporters to stay informed and assist financially with the recount efforts. Bannon concluded by highlighting the significance of this issue for the national political landscape and the importance of preventing election fraud to secure victories for candidates like Donald Trump.
Dr. Kevin Roberts Calls Out MSNBC For Rejecting Project 2025 While Ignoring Biden's Disasters
In their discussion, Steve Bannon and Dr. Kevin Roberts focused on the goals and implications of Project 2025, which aims to dismantle the administrative state and restore power to the people in line with constitutional principles. Roberts explained that the project seeks to correct the century-long progressive expansion of a “fourth branch of government” by introducing new regulations, policies, and leadership. He noted the bipartisan appeal of this effort to reclaim citizen control from an overreaching government. Bannon highlighted the significance of this initiative in light of upcoming Supreme Court decisions that could impact administrative law. Roberts criticized mainstream media and political opponents for their inability to grasp the project's importance, particularly regarding American citizenship and crime. He urged widespread participation in Project 2025, emphasizing its role as both a policy initiative and a civic education tool. The conversation concluded with Roberts providing information on how to get involved and support the project through Heritage Foundation's platforms.
Raheem Kassam Breaks Down Nigel Farage's Election Future
In their discussion, Steve Bannon and Raheem Kassam focused on reactions to Dr. Kevin Roberts' appearance on MSNBC and the broader implications of Project 2025. Kassam noted that the project's aim to restore the federal government to its intended role and to address issues like mass deportations and sealing the border has triggered significant backlash, particularly from mainstream media. Bannon emphasized the centrality of immigration as a major issue, drawing parallels with Nigel Farage's rise and the situation in France. Kassam highlighted that despite societal pressures and fears of repercussions, immigration remains a dominant concern for voters, as evidenced by conversations with the public during Farage's events. They both underscored the importance of addressing these issues in the context of preserving societal and cultural integrity in the Western world.
Source link