Just three hours into deliberations, the Manhattan jury handling former President Donald Trump's high-profile criminal trial returned to the courtroom with four urgent requests for the judge. Insiders speculate the news could suggest a possible rift among jurors, potentially working in Trump's favor.

The case will dramatically influence Trump’s future and the 2024 presidential race. A conviction would set a precedent in New York’s criminal law and possibly dim Trump's political comeback. Conversely, an acquittal could pave the way for Trump to pursue claims of malicious prosecution, bolstering his victim narrative as he eyes another White House run.

The jury's questions focus sharply on the details that could make or break the case. They requested parts of the testimony from David Pecker about a specific phone conversation with Trump and other aspects related to a notorious 2015 Trump Tower meeting. The meeting, according to prosecutors, was the genesis of the alleged scheme to suppress negative stories ahead of the 2016 election, aiming to illegally boost Trump’s campaign.

According to CNN's Paula Reid, one significant request involved Pecker’s explanation during the trial about a decision not to proceed with a deal involving Karen McDougal, a decision central to the case’s allegations. The jury’s focus on these testimonies suggests meticulous scrutiny of the evidence tied to the heart of the charges against Trump.

WATCH:

(BREAKING: Glenn Beck reveals new Biden initiative that will bankrupt America)

The charges against Trump stem from accusations that he orchestrated payments to suppress claims from adult film actress Stormy Daniels about an alleged extramarital encounter with Trump in 2006, aiming to influence the 2016 presidential election. Prosecutors are now tasked with proving that Trump not only falsified business records concerning these supposed hush money transactions but did so to further the crime of conspiring to affect an election outcome. District Attorney Bragg has argued that by allegedly using these falsified records to conceal an underlying crime, Trump transformed what would have been minor misdemeanor charges into serious felony allegations.

Over a span of six weeks, the court listened to testimony from 22 witnesses, including Stormy Daniels. Moments ago, jury deliberations ended for the day. Kayla Epstein, reporting from the courthouse, noted that while the jurors departed, the attorneys continued to work. Judge Merchan has instructed them to stay until they can locate the specific pages of testimony needed. Trump, deeply involved in the proceedings, remained alert, frequently discussing matters with his attorney, Emil Bove.

As the day wrapped up, Judge Merchan addressed the jury, scheduling the next session for 9:30 AM on Thursday. He advised jurors to avoid any external discussions or media about the case to maintain the integrity of their deliberation process.

Trump, who is contesting the charges while also facing three additional criminal cases during his current presidential campaign, has maintained his innocence. A felony conviction would be an unprecedented event in the history of American politics, particularly for a former president and a leading candidate for the Republican nomination.

VOTE NOW: Do you blame BIDEN or TRUMP for the crashing economy?