The "Decoy Dan" case just got even more twisted.
As you may know, Democrat operatives connected to Mary Peltola's Senate campaign in Alaska (allegedly) recruited a retired music teacher named Dan J. Sullivan to run against incumbent Sen.
Dan S. Sullivan.
According to reports, the sole purpose of the scheme was to confuse Alaskan voters in an attempt to split the vote and boost Democrats' chances of winning.
While the Peltola campaign and Dan J. Sullivan deny doing anything wrong, we just learned that the "fake" Dan's son is already embedded in Democrat politics.
Noah Casey Sullivan is currently employed as a field representative for Democrat Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez.
Here are the details:
NEW: Noah Casey Sullivan, the son of Dan J. Sullivan, who filed to run as a Republican against GOP incumbent Sen. Dan Scott Sullivan, is a registered Democrat who works as a field representative for Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez’s (D-WA) pic.twitter.com/P2Pes5dn2N
— Ari Hoffman (@thehoffather) October 30, 2026
Grok dragged up an alleged photo of Noah Casey Sullivan:
Noah Sullivan (second from right) with Sen. Mark Kelly during 2022 Mission for Arizona campaign work. He is the son of Daniel J. Sullivan and serves as a field representative for Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez. pic.twitter.com/ZQUOJxLf0V
— Grok (@grok) October 31, 2026
Noah Casey Sullivan has been working for Rep. Perez since at least last year.
In the past, both Perez and Mary Peltola served as co-chairs on a congressional coalition together.
The Post Millennial dove deeper into the connections:
Noah Casey Sullivan, the son of retired Petersburg teacher Dan J. Sullivan, serves as a field representative for Gluesenkamp Perez, whose district covers southwestern Washington. Congressional salary records list Noah Sullivan working in that position during 2025 and 2026.
Gluesenkamp Perez and Peltola served together as Blue Dog Coalition co-chairs during the 118th Congress.
The employment connection comes amid broader scrutiny of whether Democratic operatives helped put a second Sullivan on Alaska's ballot to confuse voters and benefit Democratic challenger Peltola.
Dan J. Sullivan entered the race as a Republican in May, challenging the incumbent, Dan S. Sullivan. Republicans questioned his party affiliation, previous contributions to Democrats, and campaign materials they alleged resembled the senator's branding. Donation records cited in a National Republican Senatorial Committee letter identified $650 in contributions to Democratic candidates between 2010 and 2025.
The challenger also received assistance launching his campaign from political consultant Amber Lee, who has supported Peltola and worked with Democratic candidates. The Petersburg Pilot reported that Lee helped prepare his announcement and website. Sullivan said he found her business through an online search.
Sen. Sullivan has accused the challenger of deliberately exploiting their shared name.
"His whole purpose of running is to confuse Alaskans, to make them think – Alaskan voters – that somehow he's me, so they could rig the vote in favor of Mary Peltola," he said in an interview with CNN.
"This is just corruption. They're trying to cheat. I mean, there's no plausible explanation."
The Petersburg candidate has defended his candidacy, telling the Anchorage Daily News: "I have done nothing that should prevent me from running in this race. I filed correctly. I paid my fees. I'm not quite sure what the stink is, but I guess I'll find out."
Alaska election officials initially removed him from the ballot after determining that his candidacy was not filed in good faith. The Alaska Supreme Court upheld his eligibility in June, ruling that officials could not impose additional qualifications beyond those established by the US Constitution.
Is anyone surprised by this revelation?
The whole "Decoy Dan" case is currently under investigation, with federal agents surging into Alaska to get to the bottom of things.
Meanwhile, the 'fake' Dan has suddenly disappeared from public life amig the ongoing probe.
Full scoop on that here:
Source link
