It’s not about dogs. It’s about Islam forcing Americans to change our habits and our way of life in order to accommodate Muslims.
Finally, NYC is coming to Islam. Dogs definitely have a place in society, just not as indoor pets. Like we’ve said all along, they are unclean.
— Nerdeen Kiswani (@NerdeenKiswani) February 12, 2026
Woman chilling on a park bench with her dog when a Muslim man walks up, motions her to leave, raises his hand to smack the dog and she snaps "Don't hit my dog!"
— Kim "Katie" USA (@KimKatieUSA) February 17, 2026
He responds with a full beheading gesture pointed right at the pup.
Liberals elected these people to run things. pic.twitter.com/nGe5CSdmmG
The obvious conclusion is that Muslim culture does not like dogs and has no qualms about being cruel toward them.
But the issue is not about dogs specifically. It is about Islam forcing Americans — who have been dog-loving and dog-using people since the Mayflower — to change our habits and our way of life in order to accommodate Muslims. It is about conquest and control. As Dana Loesch put it, it is primarily about submission, with Muslims pushing the boundaries of what they can do in America.
Not one Democrat has come out and said that people have the right to own a dog.
— Congressman Randy Fine (@RepFine) February 18, 2026
They’re all coming down on the side of, “You can lead your dog to slaughter if that’s what we have to do to make Muslim immigrants happy.”
Remember where they stand. pic.twitter.com/jTyBRCp7e0
Disgusting bigotry. https://t.co/DX9M3x0Z9J
— Jake Tapper 🦅 (@jaketapper) February 16, 2026
It’s important to understand what is unfolding. It is easy to see this as just another example of the left being the left and throwing down the “Racist!” card because that is largely what their entire deck consists of. But it is more than that. The old legal maximum “Silence means consent” (qui tacet consentire videtur) is still true. Every Democrat who has only been able to try and spin this as another example of xenophobic, Islamophobic conservatives proving their xenophobia and Islamophobia is advertising that he is an ally of Islamists — Islamists who, if given the chance, will exert power to change our way of life.
The proof of this is not the fact that Islam is currently the fastest growing religion in the world, while also rising in the United States — religion obviously changed the Roman Empire after Constantine, Mexico after the conquistadors toppled the Aztecs, the Christian Middle East after the Muslims conquered it, so of course an Islam-majority United States isn’t going to be the United States we inherited. Nor is the proof that blue cities like New York are now blasting the Muslim call to prayer, changing their own rules to allow the disturbance. The proof can be seen in Dearborn, Michigan.
Dearborn, with a population of about 100,000 people, is the city whose Muslim mayor, Abdullah Hammoud, named a street after Osama Siblani, reportedly a public defender of U.S.-designated terror groups like Hezbollah and Hamas. He also publicly told a Christian man he “was not welcome” in the city when the man expressed mild disapproval of Hammoud’s plan. Hammoud also said that he would throw a parade when the man left Dearborn.
Telling Americans to leave Dearborn seems to be habitual for its Muslim overlords: Muslim agitators shouted down one of Nick Shirley’s interviews in Dearborn, after which Shirley was told that “racists” were “not welcome.” Dearborn was also the locale where Muslims shouted, “Death to America!” so it’s not surprising that Islamists would tell Americans to leave what they clearly see as a conquered city.
And that conquest is not just in renamed streets and telling Christians that they aren’t welcome in their own cities. Arabic is now predominant in public places, and women are reportedly spat on as they walk down the streets. As Shirley’s reporting showed, these are people who do not want to become Americans, who despise America, who only want America as a colony for themselves.
But the crickets from the Democrat Party are louder than the chants of “Allahu Akbar.” What this means is that the Democrat Party — which used to be the party of Jefferson, Jackson, and Kennedy — is now firmly allied with people who want to mutate the United States into something it is not and never was supposed to be.
If they force us to choose between calling for the resignation of imbecilic bigots or normalizing hateful religious incitement, that’s not a tough one. This fanatic should spare his constituents any further embarrassment and resign. pic.twitter.com/0ZPjPu7oaZ
— Rep. Jamie Raskin (@RepRaskin) February 18, 2026
These people are just as dangerous as the Islamists. Maybe even more so. The Islamists have their convictions. But the people who make up the Democrat Party are ready to literally enslave themselves to get us.
